...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Minonk

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Seeking representation after a dog bite injury? Look no further than Carlson Bier. Specialized in Dog Bite Injuries, we provide unrivaled legal services to victims seeking justice in Minonk. Illinois law stipulates strict liability for such attacks; however, navigating personal injury claims may be overwhelming without experienced counsel on your side. This is where Carlson Bier steps in – trusted and proven personal injury lawyers who understand the severity of such incidents and work tirelessly to achieve fair compensation for clients. We guide you through the complexities of building a robust case by collecting evidence, establishing fault, and communicating injuries’ impact on your quality of life—always prioritizing our clients and proceeding from empathy first because we care deeply about every individual story that comes our way. So don’t merely navigate these troubled waters alone; let Carlson Bier’s seasoned team offer proficient guidance with uncompromising commitment because when it comes to representing dog bite injury cases across Minonk area – not all firms are created equal.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Minonk Illinois

Suffering a dog bite injury can be both physically distressing and emotionally traumatizing. Carlson Bier, an established personal injury law firm based in Illinois, is deeply committed to providing competent legal representation for individuals who have experienced such injuries. Our attorneys specialize in dog bite cases and are eager to utilize their comprehensive knowledge of Illinois dog bite laws to fight zealously on your behalf.

A notable area of concern around dog bites revolves around the wide spectrum of injuries they confer. These can range from minor cuts or bruising to severe lacerations, tears or punctures; additional complications may even arise due to infections if not promptly treated. Moreover, it’s crucial to bear in mind that these injuries often carry significant emotional impact; fear and anxiety are commonly associated with ongoing psychological trauma stemming from a vicious animal attack.

• Identifying the owner: Under Illinois law, the paramount step that should follow any instance of being bitten by a dog involves identifying the canine’s owner since they would typically be responsible for covering your damages.

• Liability assessment: Also note when you sustain a dog bite injury within the premises of its owner in an unprovoked situation, liability becomes automatically attached therein.

• Extent of the injury: Critical as well is determining how severe your injuries are along with assessing whether or not there were previous instances where this same animal attacked someone else.

In Illinois Law, according to The Animal Control Act, you have clear rights if bitten by a dog without provocation while peacefully conducting yourself somewhere you’re legally authorized to be. This framework essentially means that as long as conditions are met under law including the victim wasn’t trespassing nor did he/she provoke said animal deliberately; we at Carlson Bier assert confidently that we possess potent ammunition needed to build a strong case.

Even though all dogs could potentially induce harm and subsequently substantial bodily trauma regardless of breed type or size; statistics still confirm Pitbulls tend feature dominantly in reports of fatal attacks against humans nationwide. That noted, Illinois looks at the behavior more than breed as a decisive factor when settling such cases.

What truly sets Carlson Bier apart is our commitment to not only providing rigorous litigation for your dog bite case but also ensuring all clients feel heard, and understood. Throughout each stage of proceedings we actively keep lines of communication open so you can always know exactly what’s happening with your case while having any questions or concerns promptly addressed.

At the heart of our mission is a deep-seated belief that victims of dog bites have certain rights according to Illinois law, and we’re dedicated to doing everything within our capabilities towards ensuring these are upheld. You could be entitled to compensation covering damages like medical expenses; lost wages if unable work due injury along with payment aimed towards ameliorating pain & suffering amongst other things.

It’s important to remember after enduring an injurious encounter with an aggressive animal; regaining power over your life represents the first step on path towards recovery – and that’s precisely where Carlson Bier comes in effectually advocating for justice on your behalf.

We’re duty-bound towards shouldering stressors associated legal processes concerning your claim so you can devote time needed healing from trauma inflicted by this unfortunate incident. So why wait? Click on the button below now to receive valued details about how much potentially stands owed in respect of your case thus beginning journey toward restoration rightly deserved out there today!

IMPORTANT: Please note that it would be inconsistent with provisions underscoring Illinois attorney advertisement ethics implying expressly or otherwise existence physical office presence in any location without adequate validation- therefore refrain from referring us as “personal lawyer situated Minonk” or anything depicting similar deduction; instead simply reach out indicating want desired representational services conferred regardless geographical locale domiciled.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Minonk Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Minonk

Areas of Practice in Minonk

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Damages

Extending adept legal advice for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Offering professional legal advice for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Fault

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying adept legal help to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Trip Mishaps

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Injuries

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to guiding clients of car accidents secure fair recompense for wounds and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering adept legal representation for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for losses.

Worksite Collisions

Focused on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Damages

Dedicated to offering specialized legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in handling cases for people who have suffered harms from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and adept legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Impairment

Specializing in defending patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​