FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Minonk

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re grappling with the aftermath of a spinal cord injury, competent legal representation matters tenfold. Carlson Bier is primed to serve clients in Minonk, offering unparalleled expertise in Spinal Cord Injuries law. Our distinguished attorneys bring along a deep bench of knowledge built from years vigorously advocating for victims just like yourself. We comprehend what’s at stake – your autonomy and financial security amidst imposing healthcare costs. This sends us on an unyielding pursuit of fair compensation for injuries caused by others’ negligence or recklessness. Granted, not all personal injury lawyers have honed skills necessary to successfully argue a spinal cord injury case; we do- it’s this depth that sets us above the rest! Staying true to our promise, we maintain open communication lines ensuring continual updates about your claim’s progress whilst proffering sympathetic guidance throughout such demanding times. If you call Minonk home and find yourself needing an experienced lawyer optimal in handling complex spinal cord injuries litigation – think Carlson Bier! Your path towards justice awaits.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Minonk Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the life-altering implications of a spinal cord injury. Our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois specializes in cases involving debilitating injuries and is deeply familiar with the legal, medical, and emotional aspects of these delicate circumstances. When an individual sustains a severe spinal cord injury due to another party’s negligence or accident, it becomes imperative for them to be adequately represented to ensure justice is delivered.

We believe that an informed plaintiff makes better decisions about their case. Therefore, we consistently deliver valuable educational content concerning prevalent personal injuries such as Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). SCI are primarily categorized into two types – Complete and Incomplete. A complete SCI results in total loss of motor function below the level of the injury while an incomplete SCI implies that some neural connections remain intact hence preserving partial movement and sensory abilities.

The consequences of such injuries are far-reaching including the loss or alteration in sensory capabilities like touch & pressure sensitivity; changes in mobility & muscle control resulting from damage to nerves controlling muscles; circulatory & respiratory problems which may demand constant medical supervision; issues with bladder control; psychological trauma leading to depression & anxiety alongside financial burdens posed by recurring treatment costs.

Additionally, SCI management necessitates significant financial resources due to expenses incurred on prolonged hospital stays, rehabilitation therapy, modifications required for home accessibility amongst others. Herein comes our role as your advocates who prioritize your well-being above everything else vehemently opting for maximum possible compensation.

Recovering from a spinal cord injury also includes securing your rights within the legal realms—a task best left to our seasoned personal Injury lawyers at Carlson Bier who skillfully navigate through complex wavers binding insurance companies often aiming at reducing claimable coverage. With us on your side, rest assured that you will get nothing less than what you rightfully deserve since our attorneys strictly work on contingency fees i.e., no-win-no-fee basis symbolizing our firm commitment towards fairly representing your interests.

Moreover, it is worth noting that:

• The statute of limitations for personal injury cases in Illinois is two years from the day the accident occurred.

• Comparative negligence laws are practiced which implies that even if you were partially responsible for the accident, a claim can still be lodged though compensation might be reduced based on your level of fault.

• In Illinois, there are no caps on damages awarded to plaintiffs in personal injury cases except for medical malpractice cases.

Taking into account every facet of spinal cord injuries; we ensure an all-encompassing legal representation spanning over medication overview to keep tabs on possible side-effects and interaction; reviewing hospital records & procedures ensuring compliance with best practices and organizing independent medical examiners if required offering unparalleled services—all inspired by Carlson Bier’s lofty ethical standards and unwavering dedication towards clients’ rights.

As daunting as it seems to take up this challenging battle amidst difficult times dealing with both physical discomfort and emotional torment; remember that you don’t have to do this alone. Our highly skilled attorneys promise standing strong alongside elaborating legal connotations, suitable strategies reflecting individual case attributes thereby lowering unnecessary stress and confusion.

Now comes the most sought-after answer—How much your case could be potentially worth? While it may seem disconcerting due to inherent uncertainties involved; our advanced settlement calculator ensures accurate approximations guided by past compensations awarded factoring various discernable influences increasing chances of a fair settlement significantly beyond economic losses incorporating punitive damages and pain & suffering too.

For intricate details about probable compensation figures pertinent specifically to your case—click on the button below to find out how much your case might be worth. Partner with us at Carlson Bier where each client matters, each case counts because WE CARE! Seize this opportunity today letting us champion your cause vehemently yet compassionately while seeking what’s rightfully yours!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Minonk Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Minonk

Areas of Practice in Minonk

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying professional legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, providing skilled legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Trip Injuries

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking compensation for their damages.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Committed to aiding patients of car accidents receive fair compensation for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering professional legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for damages.

Building Collisions

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Dedicated to offering specialized legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Vertebral Injury

Committed to defending victims with spine impairments, offering specialized legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440