FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Wrongful Death Attorney in Minonk

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the difficult and sensitive period following a wrongful death, you deserve compassionate counsel and relentless representation. Carlson Bier demonstrates this commitment tirelessly to each client we serve. As one of Illinois’ highly esteemed law firms, we specialize in Wrongful Death cases with unmatched dedication to securing justice and compensation for your loss. Our experienced attorneys utilize their vast knowledge of Illinois state laws coupled with unwavering diligence to ensure optimal outcomes for our clients. Notably seen by our proven track record within Minonk’s community where our influence extends beyond geographic boundaries, Carlson Bier continues setting exemplary standards in legal advocacy throughout the region. Driven by results, every case is given exhaustive attention that reflects our comprehensive understanding of the emotional toll such circumstances extoll on families involved; thereby prioritizing personal service above all else – because at Carlson Bier you are more than just a case file but an individual needing steadfast support during these trying times. With us on your side, choose Carlson Bier—the top-tier choice for Wrongful Death Representation in Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Wrongful Death Lawyers in Minonk Illinois

In the realm of personal injury law, few topics are as complex and emotionally pressing as wrongful death. Navigating these legal waters is a daunting task, one that demands expertise only available from a seasoned attorney at Carlson Bier based in Illinois. Our unyielding pursuit of justice sets us apart; our integrity, compassion, and deep knowledge place us amongst the top advocates for victims of wrongful death.

Understanding wrongful death claims requires comprehension of several crucial factors involved in such lawsuits. Foremost among these considerations is defining ‘wrongful death’. The term refers to cases where an individual’s demise was triggered by another party’s negligence or actions deemed unlawful. Variably recognized across all states’, wrongful death forms a critical segment of personal injury law with unique characteristics separating it from other claim types.

Your eligibility for filing a wrongful death lawsuit hinges on specific conditions prevalent across most jurisdictions:

• Status as an immediate family member: Typically spouses, children, or parents depending upon state specific rules.

• Proof of monetary hardship caused due to loss: Medical expenses accrued or lost earnings as primary examples.

It becomes necessary to determine the value associated with non-economic damages like pain, suffering and consortium loss when quantifying potential compensation sought during such suits.

Undeniably, adequately addressing each far-reaching implication posed within this legal portion requires meticulous attention and nuanced understanding provided by proficient lawyers like those at Carlson Bier. We bring onboard a team backed by extensive experience in dealing with diverse wrongful death cases while demonstrating consistent excellence throughout our interactions marked by unwavering commitment towards your cause.

At Carlson Bier we understand that no amount can compensate the deep sense of loss faced during this painful period. It remains our utmost priority though to ensure wrongdoers answer for their actions while striving towards securing just recompense mandated under Illinois’ provisions covering said incidents.

Noteworthy too are statute limitations presiding over initiation periods for lodging wrongful deaths suits – typically two years post the incident in Illinois.

Making sense of this legal labyrinth can seem incredibly daunting especially considering the emotional toll loved ones face. Remarkable differences prevailing across states in terms of what qualifies as a wrongful death or who is deemed an eligible litigant make it even more imperative to have astute legal counsel by your side like that available at Carlson Bier.

At our firm, we pour our extensive knowledge, adroit negotiating skills, and unwavering support into every case. Integrating professional expertise with compassionate insights, our team guides you while continually seeking justice on your behalf under these painful circumstances.

Dealing with a wrongful death carries profound grief and confusion often compounded by looming financial worries. Unclear about where to begin? Unsure about how to negotiate the maze-like constructs of personal injury law surrounding wrongful deaths? Let us help ease that burden for you. Click the button beneath to find out just what sort of compensation your case could potentially warrant – let us uphold your rights and seek justice together.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Minonk Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Wrongful Death FAQ​

Wrongful death occurs when a person’s death is caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person.

The following people may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit:

  • The spouse or children of the deceased
  • The parents of the deceased
  • The siblings of the deceased
  • The personal representative of the deceased’s estate

To prove a wrongful death claim in Illinois, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:

  • The defendant owed the deceased a duty of care.
  • The defendant breached that duty of care.
  • The breach of duty caused the death of the deceased.
  • The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the death of the deceased.

In a wrongful death lawsuit in Illinois, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include lost wages, medical expenses, and funeral expenses.
  • Non-pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the non-financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and loss of parental guidance.

The statute of limitations for wrongful death lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the death to file a lawsuit.

If you have any questions about your legal rights or options after a wrongful death, you should contact an experienced wrongful death attorney.

All Attorney Services in Minonk

Areas of Practice in Minonk

Bicycle Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving professional legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Hospital Incompetence

Extending dedicated legal support for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, delivering professional legal assistance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Senior Mistreatment

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Slip Injuries

Professional in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Supplying legal help for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Collisions: Devoted to assisting sufferers of car accidents secure just remuneration for harms and damages.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Trucking Incident

Delivering adept legal services for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for harms.

Construction Site Incidents

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on extending professional legal support for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Damage

Committed to advocating for clients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440