...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Morrison

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a dog bite injury can result in not only painful wounds, but also potential emotional and psychological damage. When such an incident occurs in Morrison, the strength and expertise of Carlson Bier are crucial for ensuring your rights are upheld. Renowned as successful Dog Bite Injuries attorneys, we comprehend the complexities surrounding these cases both legally and medically. Navigating through Illinois’s strict liability law concerning dog bites becomes easier with Carlson Bier by your side. We meticulously assert every detail to ensure victims get fully compensated for medical bills, loss of earnings or earning capacity due to injuries, pain and suffering among others. Our track record showcases our relentless commitment towards achieving favorable resolutions even when up against formidable adversaries like insurance companies that often underestimate claims revolving around canine-inflicted damages. Trust in Carlson Bier – navigating justice on behalf of victims with competence unmatched by most other personal injury lawyer firms functioning within Illinois state boundaries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Morrison Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a group of indefatigable personal injury attorneys dedicated to protecting you and ensuring your wellbeing. Based in Illinois, one of our major specializations is representing victims who have suffered injuries due to dog bites. Understanding the traumas endured by dog bite victims, we strive every day to guide you through this distressing period while seeking maximum compensation for your devastating experience.

A unexpected encounter with an unfriendly canine can lead to severe physical and psychological damage that might impact your life significantly. We believe it is imperative that those suffering from such injuries be well-informed about their rights and possible compensations they may be entitled to under Illinois law.

Here are key points:

– Dog owners in Illinois are liable if their pet inflicts unprovoked injury on someone. This means that even if a dog has never shown any signs of aggression before or has never bitten someone previously, the owner will still typically be held responsible for all damages caused by their dog.

– Damages can include everything from medical expenses incurred for treating the bite wound and its complications, wage losses due to inability to work during recovery time, as well as pain and suffering including psychological counseling needed as result of traumatic event.

– The Statute of Limitations in Illinois states that a lawsuit must generally be filed within two years of when the attack occurred – a parameter critical in putting together an effective legal strategy.

As seasoned personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier, we intricately understand these laws and leverage this expertise towards building formidable cases consistent with Illinois regulations that safeguard victims’ rights.

In essence, just because an animal’s instinctual act led you down a painful path doesn’t mean you should bear the consequences alone or without recourse. It’s not always apparent how profound these consequences can become over time—a moderately painful bite could transform into nerve damage or infection; emotional trauma could evolve into debilitating anxiety disorders.

It is our promise at Carlson Bier to guide you through the labyrinth of legal rights, options, and statutes, delivering lucid explanations for every query and assuaging your fears with knowledgeable assurance. Why? Because we genuinely care about your peace of mind as much as your physical recovery.

We’re not just after cases—we’ve pledged commitment to stand by you. We believe that every victim deserves a compassionate ear coupled with a powerful voice in the courtroom. Each unique story is deeply valued at Carlson Bier—your emotional journey fuels us to fight even harder on your behalf.

But the question still remains – how much can be claimed for dog bite injury? No two injuries are alike; they vary in severity and impact from person to person which directly affects the compensation claim calculation. Your case is exceptional as it uniquely pertains to you: the physical pain endured, medical expenses paid, earnings lost due to time spent off work healing, or significant life alterations demanded by unforeseen consequences of an unfortunate event such as this.

Therefore, uncovering an accurate figure requires professional evaluation—a service happily offered here at Carlson Bier. Allow our experts access to review your individual situation accurately within context and obtain a precise monetary value representing damages suffered due to a dog bite incident under Illinois law.

Intrigued by what we have shared so far? Empower yourself further with tailored insights based on specifics of your experience – simply click on the button below! Discovering the potential worth of your distinct case could be fundamental towards making informed decisions concerning pursuit and receipt of adequate compensations owed to you under personal injury legislations in Illinois. Our team eagerly awaits the opportunity to offer its undivided attention and relentless advocacy towards meeting—and surmounting—all your expectations apart from being stewards guiding you through daunting confusion prevalent across stages associated with seeking rightful justice following such incidents.

So why wait any longer? Click now! We await joyously collaborate strides undertaken towards securing victories integral for your resumed life endeavours to shine brighter despite preceding daunting challenges. Your journey of recovery backed by justice starts here, at Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Morrison Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Morrison

Areas of Practice in Morrison

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Extending professional legal assistance for victims of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Ensuring professional legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal assistance to customers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Abuse

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Stumble Occurrences

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to assisting individuals of car accidents gain fair recompense for harms and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Big Rig Crash

Extending adept legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Building Accidents

Committed to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to offering professional legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Committed to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Specializing in representing victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​