FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Morrison

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is a respected law firm in Illinois that specializes in personal injury law, with an emphasis on Spinal Cord Injuries. Our superior navigating ability through legal proceedings, coupled with thorough knowledge of both state and federal laws pertaining to spinal cord injuries, sets us apart from other legal practices. The attorneys at Carlson Bier have decades of combined experience advocating for the rights of victims dealing with severe spinal cord injuries. We understand the profound physical and emotional challenges these traumas pose on not just the individual but also their families. With our specialized solutions rooted in unwavering dedication and unmatched expertise, we compassionately aid those facing life-altering situations by seeking rightful compensation for them. As much as each case varies significantly due to unique circumstances surrounding it; we are committed to matching such variations with tailored strategies geared towards achieving desirable results for every single client’s needs ensuring they receive adequate medical care or support required in Morrison city cases involving Spinal Cord Injuries where local representation becomes indispensable.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Morrison Illinois

The Carlson Bier law firm, a renowned personal injury attorney group in Illinois, provides an encompassing portfolio of legal aid to victims of various accidents and mishaps. Among the injuries we specialize in, spinal cord injuries stand as one of the most devastating accidents individuals suffer from.

Spinal Cord Injuries are severe medical conditions that result not only from direct trauma to the vertebrae but also from damage inflicted upon the spinal cord itself. The repercussions of such affliction can vary immensely depending on its location along the spine and the severity at which it has occurred. Effects can be as moderate as temporary discomfort or debilitating as permanent paralysis.

Some crucial points to understand about Spinal Cord Injuries include:

• Complete vs Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A complete injury denotes total loss of sensory and voluntary muscle control below the injury, implying paralysis. In contrast, incomplete injury entails some level of functionality remaining underneath the harmed area.

• Tetraplegia vs Paraplegia: Tetraplegia refers to an impairment in all four limbs and torso due to a cervical spinal cord wound. On the other hand, paraplegia manifests when a thoracic back injures results in impediment limited only to legs.

• Secondary Conditions: Other complications may arise over time due to Spinal Cord Injury-induced immobility- pressure sores, respiratory issues, urinary tract infections among others.

At Carlson Bier, we comprehend that after suffering a traumatic incident resulting in a spinal cord injury; pursuits like understanding your rights or canvassing through potential legal proceedings could seem daunting. Our top-notch attorneys employ their comprehensive know-how regarding these cases for you can focus solely on recovery while we advocate for you tirelessly.

Our services extend beyond representing you legally; our team acts earnestly towards secure maximum compensation for damages endured physically, emotionally,yfand financially post such debilitating incidents. Whether it’s dealing with compulsory medical expenditures or coping with lost wages due to inability to work, rest assured that we fight zealously for your justified reimbursement.

Our sympathetic approach towards litigation around spinal cord injuries arises from years of navigating through the nuances of such cases. Our legal counsel is rooted in profound compassion and steadfast commitment to safeguarding our client’s rights in contesting insurance companies and managing intricate court proceedings.

We believe it’s crucial you understand that filing a personal injury case under Illinois law within two years of the incident’s occurrence is critical. Should more than two-year lapse since the accident took place, courts may refuse hearing your case outrightly denying any chances of compensation received rightfully for your loss.

At Carlson Bier, advocating and representing victims coping with life-changing effects resulting from spinal cord injuries firmly remain at the crux of our professional practice. For anyone undergoing hardships related to such circumstances or anyone shouldering responsibilities for someone in these predicaments, remember: Professional help exists specially curated for alleviating as much discomfort out this challenging journey.

Unsure about how much worth your case holds? Allow us at Carlson Bier group launch an investigation into all aspects pertinent to your case and provide you with precise assessment—our reputation as prominent Personal Injury attorneys in Illinois sounds proof of our expertise garnered across numerous successful representations. Remember that each minute counts when striving towards maximizing your entitled compensation timely; exercise informed decision-making by learning precisely what you stand entitled too today by clicking on the button below!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Morrison Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Morrison

Areas of Practice in Morrison

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Supplying skilled legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Offering professional legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Stumble Incidents

Professional in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Devoted to supporting victims of car accidents receive reasonable recompense for wounds and harm.

Motorbike Collisions

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Trucking Accident

Delivering specialist legal support for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for harms.

Construction Collisions

Focused on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Harms

Specializing in providing dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and experienced legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Harm

Expert in representing clients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​