FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Morton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a motorcycle accident in Morton, securing legal representation should be your top priority and no firm is better equipped to handle your case than Carlson Bier. As Illinois’ renowned Motorcycle Accident law group, we specialize in advocating for victims of these accidents and hold unmatched expertise to litigate any cause effectively. Our seasoned attorneys realize the devastating impact a motorcycle crash can have on your life; from injury-related complications, financial implications due to medical bills or lost wages- our team is here taking up the fight for you. We’re committed not only to guiding through the prickly legal hurdles but also securing maximum compensation for your losses while adhering strictly figured by Illinois laws mandate. Trust us with handling insurance claims as Carlton Bier leads in negotiating successful settlements that prioritize clients’ welfare over insurance companies’ interests- maximized recovery! Have Morton’s best interest at heart even if miles apart: Your rightfulness championed by Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Morton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our commitment to representing individuals who have sustained personal injuries through no fault of their own is built on a solid foundation of expertise, empathy, and tenacity. We pride ourselves on having assembled a particularly robust area of practice in dealing with motorcycle accident cases, given their distinct rules and complexities.

Our Illinois-based firm has a profound understanding of the intricacies that surround such occurrences. Motorcycle accidents are not merely another kind of vehicular accident; they carry unique concerns primarily due to the higher degree of vulnerability faced by motorcyclists compared to other motorists. The exposed nature of motorcycles leaves riders susceptible to severe injuries even at low impact speeds.

• Lack of physical protection can result in catastrophic injuries including bone fractures, head and brain trauma or spinal cord injuries.

• There’s often bias against motorcyclists which can affect fair treatment during the legal process.

• Motorbike parts or accessories malfunction lead to accidents too.

Consequently, each motorcycle accident claim necessitates an individualized approach, crafted meticulously with knowledge and strategy. It involves extensive investigation into the specificities of the mishap paired with an in-depth acquaintance with variabilities such as helmet laws and lane splitting rules within our operational jurisdiction.

One essential matter that we strive to elucidate pertains to comparative negligence – a system followed in Illinois which evaluates proportional liability if you partially contributed to your own injury. This impartial assessment could potentially reduce your damage compensation proportionally.

An issue like ‘helmet defense’ is also crucial under these premises; despite Illinois law not mandating helmets for riders above 18 years of age it may get exploited by opposing insurers implying that lack of helmet contributed towards intensified injury thereby reducing settlement amounts – manipulating technical grey areas in favor of lowering claims.

To amplify our steadfast representation further:

• We help identify liable parties responsible for causing your crash.

• Undertake thorough investigations collecting crucial evidence substantiating your case

• Relentlessly negotiate with insurance companies to pursue the best possible compensation.

• If required, assertively present your case in court.

Our clients are not just another case number; each victim’s framework of pain and ordeal is acknowledged sensitively at Carlson Bier. Our dedicated attorneys provide you comprehensive consultation outlining strategic legal pathways tailored for your circumstances without imposing any upfront fees or charges – we get paid only if we win the settlement for you.

Navigating through insurance claim policies, medical bills, misplaced wages while recovering from physical injuries and emotional trauma can be overwhelming – having a reliable professional ally on your side can alleviate that burden significantly.

Moreover, remember every personal injury case operates under a ‘statute of limitations’ which indicates a limited time window within which legal proceedings need to be initiated – failure to act timely may result in loss of entitled compensation.

At this juncture it becomes imperative to partner with seasoned lawyers like Carlson Bier who understand the labyrinthine interplay of multiple legislative nuances associated with motorcycle accidents assuring precise representation of your interests.

Now is an appropriate moment for you to think about what comes next. Take advantage of our no-cost initial consultation simply by clicking on the button below – allow us to evaluate how much your case is worth accurately using our professional experience. We understand that this might not undo what was unfairly imposed upon you but assure justice served while standing beside you making sure that someone is held accountable responsibly. Your battle becomes ours as we work tirelessly towards securing what’s rightfully yours. Make an informed decision today and secure motivation for a better tomorrow!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Morton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Morton

Areas of Practice in Morton

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying skilled legal assistance for patients of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Physician Negligence

Providing specialist legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Stumble Mishaps

Expert in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Injuries

Providing legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Crashes: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents secure fair compensation for hurts and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Truck Collision

Offering experienced legal support for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Building Crashes

Committed to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Head Traumas

Expert in delivering professional legal assistance for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Fatality

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Damage

Expert in supporting victims with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440