...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mount Carmel

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have been bitten by a dog in Mount Carmel, the Carlson Bier law firm is ready to provide expert legal counsel. With years of experience handling Dog Bite Injuries cases across Illinois, our team will work diligently on your behalf to secure compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, and potential future care costs stemming from the incident. At Carlson Bier we understand the physical and emotional trauma that comes with being a victim of a dog bite injury; we acknowledge your feelings & rely on our extensive professional expertise to guide you through this challenging situation. Our history shows unwavering commitment towards advocating for our clients’ rights & achieving higher success rates within dog-bite injury suits compared to peers (avoiding direct claims). Contact us today! Let’s make sure justice prevails and mitigate further consequences together – how? By putting forth an unassailable case showing clear-cut liability grounded in local ordinances pertaining specifically to dog ownership responsibilities.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mount Carmel Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to providing exceptional legal services for victims of dog bite injuries in Illinois. Our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys understands the physical and emotional toll a dog bite can take on an individual’s life. These severe incidents often result in not only devastating bodily harm but also impose substantial financial burdens due to medical treatments, therapy costs, and possible loss of wages from time off work.

Dog bites account for a significant percentage of personal injury cases annually throughout the state. It’s essential that if you or your child have been bitten by a dog, you promptly consult with adept lawyers like our experienced team at Carlson Bier to safeguard your rights.

Some key things to remember about dog bite injury laws are:

• Strict liability: The State of Illinois adheres to strict liability pet laws. This means that regardless of whether a pet owner knew their animal could be harmful or if it was their first aggressive act, they are still held responsible for any damage caused by their pet.

• Status-dependent penalties: Penalties can significantly vary based on the aggressor dog’s previous records and severity of injuries inflicted.

• Necessary evidence: Should you decide to pursue claims arising from a dog bite, having sufficient proof such as medical reports documenting the extent of your injuries; photographs showing visible wounds; or testimonies from witnesses will considerably strengthen your case.

Navigating through legal processes surrounding dog bite injury litigation may appear daunting without proper guidance; however, with our competent attorneys’ decades-long experience handling these personality-specific regulatory nuances, you’re guaranteed excellent representation.

We believe awareness is vital when dealing with potential claims related to such incidents. A myriad damages victims can claim extend beyond immediate health care expenses including future treatment modalities (such as psychological counseling necessitated due lack traumatic experiences); pain suffering endured during after event occurred according current levels distress perceived victim; income losses suffered either short-term long-term because inability carry regular duties work inability to work at all.

Moreover, the pet owner’s homeowner’s insurance may cover the victim’s damages in most cases. Even in situations where claim denial seems imminent due to inadequate coverage or various policy exclusion clauses, our seasoned lawyers meticulously investigate viable avenues for securing a suitable settlement for you, ensuring that justice is served and proper compensation provided.

At Carlson Bier, we emphasize clear communication and transparency with our clients. Our zealous attorneys work diligently on your behalf documenting each crucial detail of your unfortunate incident, providing accurate legal advice based on existing laws while humanely empathizing with the hardship sustained by dog bite victims. We passionately pursue fair compensation commensurate with our client’s losses, aware that no amount can truly rectify the physical and emotional damage they’ve endured but endeavoring to alleviate their financial straits significantly so they are better able to face subsequent challenges.

In conclusion, if you have fallen prey to an unprovoked dog attack resulting in significant injuries that impact your everyday life quality or require ongoing medical care – do not waver any longer. Reach out today to Carlson Bier – professional personal injury lawyer- for sound legal counsel and efficient representation aimed at achieving positive outcomes. Please click the button below right away to determine how much compensation your case might be worth. Evidence erodes over time; hence it is vital that prompt action is taken! You can trust us – we genuinely care about every client and are committed unwaveringly towards securing rightful claims promptly even when faced with stiff resistance from insurers unwilling initially fulfill obligations owed injured individuals entrusted us representation duties during these trying times. Remember – time is of essence here…

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Carmel Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mount Carmel

Areas of Practice in Mount Carmel

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Scald Damages

Providing skilled legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering specialist legal assistance for victims affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Obligation

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal guidance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Fall Occurrences

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Offering legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents receive fair settlement for injuries and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Trucking Accident

Offering professional legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Building Incidents

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Impairments

Specializing in offering compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and experienced legal services to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in defending individuals with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​