...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mulberry Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the ordeal of a dog bite injury in Mulberry Grove, look no further than Carlson Bier. Well versed in Illinois personal injury law, our expert team understands the complexities that arise from these unfortunate incidents and is prepared to fight tirelessly on your behalf. Our track record showcases numerous triumphant dog bite cases where we have successfully advocated for justice and fair compensation. With unwavering focus on client satisfaction, we commit ourselves not just to winning your case but also ensuring you feel supported during this trying situation. Choose Carlson Bier as your advocate after a traumatic incident like a dog bite – our knowledge, tenacity and compassion truly set us apart from others in the field of personal injury laws pertaining to canine attacks. We are here for you around-the-clock; every step of this challenging journey backed by an experienced legal force who make it their mission to champion victims’ rights leading towards favorable outcomes.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mulberry Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of seasoned Personal Injury Attorneys dedicated to fervently advocating for victims of dog bite injuries. As being centrally located in Illinois, we understand that dog attacks can result horrifically in physical pain and emotional trauma. Our commitment is therefore focused on ensuring that you receive justifiable compensation for any damages or losses incurred.

Critical to our practice is fully comprehending the extent and nuances of Illinois Dog Bite Laws as these statutes guide our strategic approach in pursuing your case vehemently. Injured parties must be privy to salient factors such as:

• Legal responsibility: The law stipulates that a dog owner is liable if their pet injures someone unprovoked, provided the victim is lawfully present at the location where it occurred.

• Damages attainable: Victims may be eligible to claim for medical costs, lost wages due to inability to work, emotional distress or disfigurement and loss of normal life among other things.

• Statute of limitations: It’s crucial to note there’s a limited period within which an individual can initiate legal proceedings post a dog bite accident; action should thus be hastened post-incident.

Our attorneys also provide invaluable counsel on evaluating case viability against established infrastructure under Illinois civil statute 510 ILCS 5/16…. This intricate understanding coupled with exemplary negotiation skills has seen us successfully claim substantial settlements designed essentially around rehabilitating one’s quality of life.

Around 4.5 million Americans endure dog bites each year according statistics from Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC); with approximately 20% warranting professional medical attention. Outlined below are certain common medical conditions attributed towards severe Dog Bite Attacks:

• Infections including Rabies

• Sepsis

• Tetanus

• Permanent scarring / Disfigurement

• Muscle damage

Experience does certainly tell us how traumatic aftermaths involving particularly serious wounds can inadvertently lead toward Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders (PTSD), depression and anxiety complications – aspects we meticulously account for within our comprehensive claim pursuits.

At Carlson Bier, there’s an interplay between combining thorough case preparation with a robust litigation strategy. This has allowed us to consistently recover the highest possible compensation. We understand that each dog-bite injury case presents its unique challenges, hence why we meticulously personalize handling for optimal results.

Charting this course involves facially gathering and reviewing medical records alongside detailing all probable future therapeutic needs attributed towards your ordeal – including surgical procedures, rehabilitation therapies or psychological counseling. Also factored within our ambit are considerations on how injuries could impair earning capabilities or necessitate household modifications for aiding recuperation processes.

And while tangible cost burdens post-accident can indeed be daunting, here at Carlsberg Bier it’s pivotal you know that we mainly operate on contingency basis; meaning you don’t owe us anything unless we win your case.

Being assaulted by a dog is nothing less than terrifying and unfortunately can have profound long-lasting effects. In this regard, pursuing rightful compensation becomes more than just about present implications but significantly about ensuring one’s capacity in addressing any resulting future predicaments; equitably redressing life quality dimension shifts stemming from such incidents.

We invite you therefore to tap into our knowledge bank derived from years of experience litigating these very issues against insurance companies…and winning! Simply click on the button below to get an evaluation of what your case might actually be worth – even if you decide not to proceed afterwards. With significant expertise and proven success record as a Personal Injury Law Firm rooted within Illinois State parameters – Carlson Bier remains steadfastly committed in championing your rights toward achieving maximal legal restitution post dog bite accident scenarios.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Mulberry Grove Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mulberry Grove

Areas of Practice in Mulberry Grove

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Offering specialist legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Misconduct

Extending professional legal support for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Fall Mishaps

Adept in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking compensation for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding patients of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Semi Mishap

Ensuring professional legal assistance for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for damages.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Focused on ensuring professional legal support for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in handling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and adept legal services to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​