...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Murphysboro

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with aftermath of dog bite injuries in Murphysboro, rely on Carlson Bier for unmatched legal support. We recognize the trauma following such incidents and work tirelessly to ensure victims obtain their deserved compensation. Our team’s expertise is deeply rooted in personal injury law, specializing particularly in dog bite cases. At Carlson Bier, greater understanding of Illinois’ complex legislation surrounding dog bites equips us to tackle even the most challenging scenarios effectively. We’ve earned a reputation as relentless advocates pursuing justice relentlessly for our clients through meticulous investigation process that leaves no stone unturned. Our proficient lawyers conduct negotiations skillfully and are always prepared to litigate if required so you receive maximum compensatory benefits as swiftly as possible! Keep your focus on recovery while resting assured we’ll safeguard your rights without compromise at CarlBirnson Bier Attorneys at Law–your top choice when confronting Dog Bite Injuries matters near Murphysboro yet serving residents statewide across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Murphysboro Illinois

Dedicated to helping victims of personal injuries, Carlson Bier approaches each case with vigor, compassion, and expertise. One area we particularly excel in is assisting clients who have unfortunately become victims of dog bite incidents. Situated in Illinois where hundreds suffer from canine-related injuries annually, our law firm stands tall as a champion for the injured and their families.

Dog bite injury cases can be more intricate than they appear at face value; they do not merely involve proving that a dog bit you. Rather, they require detailed knowledge about the specific state protocols and laws regarding animal attacks—to which these make up a particular niche within personal injury law—that varies greatly from area to area.

In Illinois specifically:

– A dog owner may be held liable if his or her dog causes any form of harm or damage to another person without provocation.

– The victim shouldn’t be found trespassing or acting unlawfully for him/her to file a claim successfully.

– If one’s conduct led to the injury inflicted by the said animal somehow (e.g., teasing or provoking); he/she might lose grounds on holding full compensation.

Our team at Carlson Bier aggressively works within this legal framework ensuring total fairness gained by victims we represent.

Dog bites can lead to severe trauma and long-term physical effects such as scars, nerve damage, infection risk–all associated medical costs undeniably pile up even adding emotional distress thereafter. Justice must be sought not just for mere revenge but basically due acknowledgement and recovery advancement turned upon you post-incident—this is what we aim at Carlson Bier: achieving maximum settlements reached out towards every client served.

At our resourceful law firm, our attorneys thoroughly investigate each case including but not limited to acquiring medical records and reports facilitating strong evidence against involved unfair parties. Further strengthened via consultations done with seasoned veterinary experts helping solidify claims on your rightful sought-after damages.

Moreover:

– Any documentation related like photographs taken could significantly reinforce evidence presented.

– Documentation of incurred bills or any lost wages is highly significant to your case

– Affirming witness testimony could prove valuable in solidifying our case and ensuring a successful resolution.

Fully understanding Illinois’s dog bite laws plus utilizing extensive resources well, Carlson Bier can expertly guide you throughout the legal proceedings. Despite intricacies tangled along dealing with insurance adjusters, establishing fault—leave this behind: let us handle the tedious undertaking for you focused on recovering. Timbered selection of former clients had been comforted and secured as we rise against injustice they’ve met serving aggressive representation that balances out care discerned from their vulnerability.

Inflicted by a traumatic dog bite injury? You’re not alone—we strive to work shoulder-to-shoulder providing informed legal assistance enabling justice finding its way onto hefty recovery dues coming rightfully unto you making moments count as each moment heals. Do bear your burden alone when the law provides means to reduced sufferings fell upon—an act Carlson Bier excels at doing for years now within Illinois jurisdictional edges.

Time plays a crucial role in personal injury claims hence urgency must also be considered significantly–dedicate no second guessing; shift over dragging doubts right into taking appropriate legal actions reciprocated through rightful compensation served. Click on the button below explore how much your potential claim might be worth ascertain how fair justice seeks balance towards those harmed undeservedly—as tireless advocates—rewrite unjust infliction faced over turning tides where fairness is felt genuinely more than just legally spoken under court premises here at Carlson Bier—the beacon defending victims inflicted around canine-inflicted harm scaled against rightful legal solicitation favored by righful dues yet untapped hereby accessed bridging gaps between undue distress towards calculated timely relief reached certainly.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Murphysboro Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Murphysboro

Areas of Practice in Murphysboro

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Proficient in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Supplying expert legal support for people of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Delivering expert legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Responsibility

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, offering adept legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Malpractice

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Fall Injuries

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Damages

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents get fair compensation for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Mishap

Offering experienced legal services for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Harms

Specializing in ensuring expert legal services for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Injury

Focused on supporting individuals with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​