FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Near North Side

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dealing with a spinal cord injury is an incredibly challenging ordeal. Such injuries can disrupt lives drastically, leading to emotional upheaval and financial strain. At this difficult juncture, seeking legal assistance from competent professionals like Carlson Bier becomes vital. Known for their diligence and tenacity, Carlson Bier attorneys specialise in representing victims of spinal cord injuries across various municipalities in Illinois including the Near North Side. Their extensive knowledge about the complexities involved in these cases prove invaluable when it comes to cutting through technical medical terminology and understanding local judicial processes associated with severe personal injury claims .Whether fighting your case vigorously at trial or seeking fair compensation through negotiation settlements, they demonstrate unmatched commitment towards securing maximum benefits for clients. The unwavering dedication coupled with a deep-seated understanding of the tribulations faced by such injury victims allows Carlson Bier to provide top-notch legal services that are both compassionate as well as efficient – truly setting them apart as impressive advocates for spinal cord injury cases within Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Near North Side Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are devoted to our clients and strive to provide renowned representation for those facing potentially life-changing injuries. One of these areas that we particularly focus on is spinal cord injuries – a type of devastating trauma that requires immediate and effective legal advocacy.

The human spinal cord is the primary conduit for transmitting signals from the brain to various parts of the body. Any injury inflicted on this intricate organ can lead to catastrophic consequences such as nerve damage, paralysis or even death. Not only are victims plagued by physical pain but they also undergo immense psychological turmoil due to radical alterations in lifestyle and routine. This often results into significant emotional distress, an issue which makes securing financial compensation a matter of unparalleled importance.

Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) can occur from numerous causes including, but not limited to motor vehicle accidents, falls, sporting incidents and violence-related events among others. They manifest in varying degrees depending upon factors like severity and location of impact along with response time post-injury.

• Severity: Minor spinal cord injuries may result in temporary numbness or weakness whereas severe injuries might cause permanent paralysis.

• Location: Damage towards top end of spine primarily impacts bodily functions above waist while trauma inflicted lower down impacts areas below waist.

• Response Time: Immediate medical attention could potentially reduce long-term effects following spinal cord injury.

When pursuing a personal injury case pertaining to SCI’s it’s indispensable to have proficient legal counsel guiding you through complex litigation process; here at Carlson Bier we offer exactly that- qualified professionals adept at navigating intricacies associated with these cases who tireless fight for your rights.

Our proficient team evaluates each detail meticulously thereby enabling us to present compelling evidence supporting you claims- be it medical documents outlining extent or nature of injury, records indicating loss of income or testimonials corroborating mental anguish endured by victim among others. We use these evidences coherently so as ensure optimal results for our clients ensuring they receive compensations essential for addressing medical costs, potential loss of income and reduced life quality.

We are dedicated to providing our clients throughout Illinois with highest possible degree of personal attention. From the moment you hire us until conclusion of your case , we remain by your side- we understand how crucial every aspect of your recovery can be which is why we commit ourselves to alleviate burden on victims by shouldering legal complexities they might face.

If you or a loved one has sustained a spinal cord injury due to someone else’s negligence, Carlson Bier is prepared to assist you during this difficult time. Our firm’s dedication to uphold justice comes hand in hand with compassion for our clients. We work diligently defending your rights, ensuring those responsible are held accountable while also placing high priority towards client’s need for speedy resolution.

Remember: Every element of your spinal cord injury could dramatically impact total compensation awarded and knowledgeable attorney acts instrumental in maximizing this value thereby protecting victim and their family members from future surprise expenditures related tor recovery process.

Finally at Carlson Bier, we endeavour making the legal process as stress-free as practical; understanding that living with spinal cord injuries can be challenging enough already even without added anxieties surrounding mounting medical bills or complex litigation proceedings. To potentially ease some concerns, allow us to evaluate unique circumstance revolving around your not-at-fault incident or accident and ascertain how much your resultant case might actually be worth- click the button below now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Near North Side Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Near North Side

Areas of Practice in Near North Side

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Supplying expert legal support for patients of severe burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering expert legal assistance for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal assistance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Abuse

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Slip Occurrences

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their damages.

Neonatal Injuries

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to guiding patients of car accidents receive fair recompense for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Crash

Providing professional legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Construction Accidents

Dedicated to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Focused on providing specialized legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering professional legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440