...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Nokomis

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a dog bite injury can be traumatizing and you deserve the right representation to handle your case. Allow Carlson Bier, recognized experts in Dog Bite Injuries legislation, to lead you through this challenging time with impressive competence. We have an outstanding track record in securing compensation for clients unfortunate enough to have suffered such injuries. Our dedicated attorneys understand that alongside physical wounds, the psychological impact of these incidents cannot be underestimated. As proven authorities within Illinois State law concerning canine-related harm, we’ll work diligently on your behalf seeking maximum remuneration for medical bills or emotional distress caused by negligent pet owners. Tailoring our approach uniquely to each circumstance while operating under strict ethical regulations grants us distinction among competing firms. Carlson Bier consistently upholds a meticulous stance towards privacy and client happiness which is respected across local communities near Nokomis alike despite no physical presence there—a testament in itself of our exceptional legal services for victims of dog bites statewide throughout Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Nokomis Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to representing those who have suffered dog bite injuries due to the negligence of a pet owner. Our experienced Illinois personal injury attorneys understand the physical and emotional trauma associated with such cases and take every necessary step towards securing a favourable resolution for our clients.

Dog bite-related incidents are often overlooked yet are some of the most common forms personal injury lawsuits. Their increasing prevalence in society calls for more awareness and decisive legal action when necessary. When dogs become threatening or violent, causing harm to individuals either through biting or attacking, it frequently results from irresponsible ownership. The victim may suffer varying degrees of injuries; ranging from minor cuts or wounds, disfigurement, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bacterial infections to life-threatening health complications.

• Severe tearing and puncture wounds can lead to permanent scarring.

• Dog bites often result in psychological issues like depression, anxiety and PTSD.

• Rabies is a critical concern if the dog is not vaccinated.

• Bone fractures occur if victims fall while trying to escape an attack.

Illinois law clearly protects victims of dog attacks. It falls under strict liability – essentially meaning that even if a dog has no prior record of violence or the owner had no knowledge of such behavior, they can be held financially responsible for all damages arising from unforeseen aggression.

Being knowledgeable about your rights as a victim is crucial:

– An Illinois citizen bitten by someone else’s pet without provocation can sue its owner for civil damages

– Legal proceedings do not require proof that the animal was previously aggressive

– Owners cannot claim ignorance about their pets’ aggression as valid defense

When you solicit Carlson Bier’s expert counsel following a harmful encounter with an aggressive canine our foremost priority will be thoroughly investigating your situation and ensuring equitable justice is served promptly. Our team dutifully examines several aspects surrounding each case scenario:

• Circumstances leading up to the incident: Was the animal provoked or did it attack without cause?

• Has the dog exhibited aggressive behavior in past instances?

• Were there any witnesses who could help establish the facts of your case?

With a firm understanding of these specific conditions, our Illinois-based team will confront negligent pet owners to demand appropriate compensation. This covers immediate medical expenses, ongoing therapy costs if required, lost wages due to temporary or permanent disability, and compensation for pain and suffering.

Additionally, Carlson Bier attorneys understand how interaction with insurance companies can amplify distress during an already challenging time. We hence handle all communication with insurers on your behalf, ensuring you receive deserved recompense swiftly avoiding undervaluing trickery often resorted by insurers keen on protecting their financial interests rather than claimants’ rights.

Our reputation as committed personal injury lawyers stems from unwavering dedication towards mitigating the aftermaths of unavoidable dog bite incidents owe to unchecked pet-owner negligence. By entrusting us with legal representation, rest assured your case is in highly skilled hands endeavoring ceaselessly optimizing rightful settlement reimbursement against suffered damages.

Carlson Bier encourages victims not to bear this burden alone. Reach out today for empathetic guidance and diligent representation services that have been trusted by countless Illinois residents over the years. Advisory consultations are free, kept confidential and serve as ideal opportunities for gaining insights into potential legal avenues available aspiring justifiable closure following unfortunate sufferance impacting lives physically and emotionally profoundly so.

When choosing our esteemed Illinois law offices for assuring balanced rectification considering life-altering canine bite mishaps consequence ponder upon:

– Will my insurance cover these costly medical bills?

– Can I recover lost wages caused by incapacity post bites traumatizing ordeal?

– How can future employability be evaluated considering unforeseen impediments resultant injuries aftermath severity?

Unanswered vital queries quelling proceedings remediation necessitation strengthens grounds fortifying settlement discussions favorably enhancing pecuniary reconciliation possibilities valuable significance embracing real-life burdens. Champions of victim rights like Carlson Bier excel in providing comprehensive strategies integrating factual circumstances and legal complexities adeptly navigating towards justifiable compensation gratification.

We greatly believe our clients’ distresses mandate expert representation, fervently advocating rightful entitlement realization – every individual is entitled to safety and peace of mind. Click on the button below to understand how much your case might be worth and allow us to genuinely assist you in asserting your legal rights, securing economic assistance ensuring continuity amidst adversity complementing resilient recovery stride as we tread alongside activism committed justice assurance through decisive action irrefutable fortitude Carlson Bier.’s attorney prowess guarantees conscientious counsel battling unwarranted canine aggression retributions irreversible holds.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Nokomis Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Nokomis

Areas of Practice in Nokomis

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying skilled legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Physician Incompetence

Delivering dedicated legal representation for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving defective products, delivering professional legal help to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Stumble Occurrences

Adept in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Crashes: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents gain equitable payout for harms and harm.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Crash

Offering professional legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for losses.

Building Collisions

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Dedicated to extending expert legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Harms

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Impairment

Specializing in supporting persons with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer