FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in North Chicago

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have been involved in a pedestrian accident in North Chicago, look no further than Carlson Bier for unrivaled legal assistance. We are an esteemed firm specializing in personal injury law, particularly Pedestrian Accident cases. At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating effects a pedestrian accident can bring on one’s life – arduous physical recovery paired with mounting medical bills and lost wages — this burden should not be yours to carry alone. When it comes to seeking justice and fair compensation, our dedicated lawyers exhibit uncanny expertise towards ensuring those at fault pay their dues adequately. In AHLA surveys and renowned legal directories such as Martindale-Hubbell and AVVO, we continually receive commendations for our high-quality services from satisfied clients who trust us implicitly due partly because of our dedication to prioritizing clients’ interests above all else. Operating within Illinois state laws while strictly abiding by professional ethics codes ensures that every client gets impeccable representation with dignity preserved throughout proceedings – factors which firmly establish Carlson Bier as your ultimate consideration when dealing with Pedestrian Accidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in North Chicago Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a pedestrian accident can be complex and overwhelming. The law firm of Carlson Bier, your trusted Personal Injury Attorney Group in Illinois, is here to provide comprehensive guidance and dedicated representation every step of the way. We specialize in various aspects of personal injury claims, with a strong emphasis on pedestrian accidents.

Pedestrian accidents remain prevalent across many streets in Illinois. These tragic incidents often yield severe injuries or fatality due to the vulnerability of an individual against motor vehicles’ force. When collisions occur, pedestrian victims are entitled under Illinois law to seek fair compensation for their suffering and losses. Here at Carlson Bier, we commit ourselves tirelessly to pursue true justice for you.

• Serious physical injuries: Often result from pedestrian accidents which include fractures, brain traumas, spinal cord damage, among others; these conditions require significant medical care which exposes victims to exorbitant hospital bills.

• Emotional distress: The lingering trauma following an accident may cause psychological discomfort needing professional therapy.

• Lost Wages: If your recovery period compels you out of work temporarily or permanently affects your capacity to earn a living.

• Property Loss/Damage: This includes any belongings that were affected during the incident.

Notably, understanding who is at fault following an accident comes down to establishing negligence. Whether it’s distracted driving by motorists or failure to comply with traffic laws such as not yielding appropriately at crosswalks – these acts could constitute negligence making them liable for damages. Therefore if you’ve been involved in such unfortunate happenings – lean on our expertise – let us strive for your legal rights while you focus solely on recovery.

Illinois law utilizes a modified comparative fault system wherein compensations might be reduced according to each party’s percentage of blame; therefore even if deemed partially responsible during such incidents- there still lies a scope for compensation under this principle. During our persistent pursuit towards maximal possible settlement for clients like yourself; this facet will also be meticulously evaluated.

Time is of the essence in personal injury cases and pedestrian accidents are no different. Illinois enacts a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims. Hence, swift action is crucial to secure full compensation as delayed actions might exceed this window inhibiting prospects to claim deserved damages. Always remember – Carlson Bier is waiting with open arms to help you through this daunting time – It’s never too early or late to seek legal advice!

Transparency ranks high amongst our values; we operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning until victory attains our legal fees shall not burden you. The usual intimidation factor associated with lawyer fees will no longer hold any merit; rest assured, at Carlson Bier your welfare tops all priorities.

Let’s navigate these difficult situations in unity; taking the first step towards justice starts by contacting us. To further assist you along your journey after such an accident, Carlson Bier offers complimentary consultation sessions – where each query can find its answer backed by tailored professional advice personally delivered from our experienced attorneys.

Our commitment extends beyond mere words- it reflects vividly throughout every case we handle- Be rest assured with Hood Law we uphold utter dedication steering our efforts tireless till victory is ensured! Our law firm operates strictly within Illinois boundaries – Our physical office location legally abides by State Law thus ensuring utmost credibility across all operations!

Your road to recovery begins here at Carlson Bier; combating uncertainties that shroud post-accident experiences harmoniously together! Please note before leaving this page: You may just be a click away from discovering how much your case could potentially yield! Find out below what fair compensation you’re entitled to following your ordeal – don’t delay further in taking charge back over your life circumstances after enduring such adversity – Click on the button below now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Chicago Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in North Chicago

Areas of Practice in North Chicago

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Giving professional legal advice for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Providing expert legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Handling cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Malpractice

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Trip Injuries

Specialist in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their losses.

Infant Harms

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Crashes: Dedicated to helping sufferers of car accidents secure fair compensation for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Trucking Collision

Delivering expert legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Worksite Crashes

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Harm

Dedicated to assisting clients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​