FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Oak Forest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve suffered a dog bite injury in Oak Forest, Carlson Bier is the ideal law firm to consult. Experienced and effective, we specialize in handling Dog Bite Injuries with precision. Our team of seasoned attorneys understands the physical and emotional trauma inflicted by such incidents; hence we are committed to securing just compensation for our clients’ injuries. We recognize that every case has unique aspects; thus you’ll receive personalized legal advice designed to advocate for your rights effectively. At Carlson Bier, prevailing laws pertinent to dog ownership responsibilities in Illinois form part of our specialist knowledge suite – contributing significantly towards ensuring successful outcomes even in challenging cases . Our extensive trial experience adds an extra layer of assuredness towards getting what you rightfully deserve. You can trust us not only because we prioritize your best interests but also abide rigorously by all ethical standards set forth by the state laws including geographic representations – conveying authority without compromise on integrity or credibility as your trusted legal advisors for Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Oak Forest Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois. Today we will explore a sensitive issue, Dog Bite Injuries, that millions experience each year with sometimes debilitating consequences. Acquire an in-depth understanding and ensure that you aren’t left vulnerable in such a situation.

Dog bites are more than just superficial wounds; they can result in severe injuries leading to infections and diseases like Rabies and Tetanus or cause deep psychological trauma. Victims can suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), fear of animals (cynophobia), anxiety, disfigurement, nerve damage among others. Navigate successfully through these complex challenges by understanding some key aspects:

• Prosecution under Illinois law: The state’s Animal Control Act maintains that dog owners are liable for any damages inflicted upon individuals bitten by their pet without provocation while the person is conducting themselves peaceably on public ways or legally on the owner’s property.

• Statute of Limitations: It’s important to realize there exist legal time limits within which you must file your claim following a dog bite incident in Illinois – generally two years after the date of the injury.

• Understanding ‘Strict Liability’: Unlike many other states where one needs to prove negligence on part of the dog owner for them to be held accountable, Illinois follows ‘strict liability’. This holds owners responsible regardless if it’s the first aggressive behavior exhibited by their pet or if they had no reason to believe it was dangerous.

• Gathering Evidence: Preparing a strong case often relies heavily on compiling substantial evidence. Include photographs immediately taken after the incident showing severity & nature of wounds, along with medical reports documenting treatments received due potential infections/diseases contracted.

At Carlson Bier, we understand how physically taxing and emotionally distressing dog bites can be amidst worrying about accumulating medical bills and loss of earning potential due inability/complications arising from returning work following such an incident. Our team employs seasoned litigation strategies and maintains unparalleled dedication to clients, ensuring they receive the financial restitution deserved.

We will work relentlessly on your behalf making necessary investigations, conducting negotiations with insurers and if required, presenting a solid case in court. We aim to ensure you are appropriately compensated for damages including medical expenses incurred, lost wages due potential inability of returning back to employment during recovery period, cost of future treatment related psychological trauma (if any), pain & suffering endured.

Our practice takes pride in empowering clients with comprehensive knowledge that allows them to make informed decisions when dealing with such overwhelming situations. This client-first approach combined our legal expertise is why Carlson Bier stands as one of Illinois’s preeminent personal injury law firms.

Understanding dog bite laws in Illinois or figuring out how you may be legally entitled compensation for injuries sustained in such incidents can pose several challenges. That’s where we step-in; think of us as your partners through this strenuous journey ensuring no stone goes left unturned protecting rights and interests based on statewide applicable laws pertaining dog bites.

At Carlson Bier we breathe life into the maxim ‘justice delayed is justice denied’ by fervently pursuing comprehensive & fair compensation owed atop speeding up usually time-consuming litigation processes – let’s chart this path together towards recompense.

Wanting a better understanding about potential recoveries linked specifically with your dog bite incident? It’s normal feeling unsure about next steps or being hesitant before initiating legal procedures; taking first steps could also seem daunting! If these scenarios resonate with you then click on the button below now! Discover what could potentially lie ahead realizing your claim’s worth joining hands an expert like Carlson Bier – committed providing not just effective but compassionate representation too.

Trust us to protect your rights while guiding you through complex legal proceedings because at Carlson Bier ‘Your Protection Is Our Pursuit’. Don’t wait any longer – change begins here!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oak Forest Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Oak Forest

Areas of Practice in Oak Forest

Bicycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving adept legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal assistance for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Accountability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Abuse

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Devoted to helping individuals of car accidents secure appropriate remuneration for wounds and harm.

Bike Collisions

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring adept legal assistance for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Head Damages

Specializing in ensuring expert legal support for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Dedicated to representing individuals with spine impairments, offering specialized legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​