...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Oak Forest

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For those unfortunate enough to experience a bicycle accident in Oak Forest, it’s reassuring to know that Carlson Bier is available for immediate legal assistance. As leading personal injury lawyers specializing in bicycle accident cases, their unparalleled expertise ensures victims have the robust representation they deserve. Carlson Bier’s unique approach marries compassion and powerful advocacy; this blend is ideal when fighting for your rights as a victim of negligence on the roadways of Oak Forest. From sorting medical bills, seeking reliable aid, to understanding complex insurance claims—every potential stressor dissipates under their proficient guidance. Dealing with recovery can be an overwhelming process—you don’t have to face it alone: choose Carlson Bier as your compelling ally against unjust circumstances resulting from a bike mishap. Their relentless pursuit of justice speaks volumes about their commitment towards clients’ restored well-being and peace-of-mind post-accident—an assurance only possible through partnering with noted experts like them in biking law matters related specifically for Illinois jurisdictions where you tread fearlessly every day on two wheels.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Oak Forest Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re cognizant of the unique challenges faced by cyclists involved in an accident. As a renowned personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our legal expertise extends to cases involving bicycle accidents. Our dedication to ensuring your rights are protected and justice served is unrivaled.

Navigating the aftermath of an accident can be emotionally taxing and legally complex. One factor contributing to this complexity is discerning culpability amidst swirling emotions and chaotic incident scenes. However, having fought for the rights of countless cyclists over the years, we understand that negligence often lies at the heart of most bicycle accidents.

Negligence may take shape as blatant reckless driving or more subtle forms like poor road construction or maintenance issues making cycling perilous; all can impact case outcomes significantly. A thorough investigation led by our seasoned attorneys will unearth these crucial determinants playing a role in fortifying your claim.

We underscore three key points following a bicycle accident: Firstly, seeking immediate medical attention is paramount regardless of perceived severity – your health takes precedence above all else. Secondly, gathering vital evidence (photos, eyewitness accounts etc.) aids greatly in unraveling complexities inherent within these incidents. Lastly but far from being least – reaching out to top-tier legal representation such as us at Carlson Bier promptly ensures comprehensive defense preparation thus enhancing case outcome viability.

Moreover, going up against imposing insurance corporations without proficient counsel risks compromising entitlements rightfully yours under Illinois law which abounds with safeguards designed protecting bicyclist’s welfare on roads and beyond clutches of injurious harm.

Our longstanding experience provides unique insights into how insurers operate making claims processing less daunting for you while maximizing possible compensation accruement – achieved through meticulous negotiations or vehement litigation if situations warrant such approaches.. The understanding that each case holds distinct characteristics engenders customized strategies tailor-made for client’s specific circumstances hence appreciably heightening possibilities favorable settlements or victorious court verdicts.

Illinois set forth specific laws pertaining to bicyclists and their rights on roadways. Laws such as those requiring motorists giving cyclists adequate space when overtaking; right of way to cyclists at intersections are all designed to guarantee safety while reinforcing shared responsibility concept between motorists and cyclists.

Nevertheless, the unfortunate reality remains – not everyone adheres to these regulations invariably leading to unwarranted hazardous situations and consequent accidents. Understanding violations breaching these rules and harnessing this knowledge in post-accident litigation is where our prowess lies, radically enhancing prospects rightful compensation receipt.

At Carlson Bier, we aim towards easing your journey through turbulent periods following bicycle accidents. Our commitment extends from providing superior legal representation through complexities culminating personal injury claims making transitions smoother still secure for you. Seeking diligent counsel renowned for results-driven approach becomes essential under trying circumstances.

Where legal expertise blends with compassionate understanding yielding superior representation marks exemplification of our core ethos straddling numerous successful client integrations over sustained timeframes essentially setting us apart within fiercely competitive realms encompassing personal injury lawyers across Illinois state’s wide expanse.

We invite affected parties or inquiries related therewith interested in knowing more – simply click beneath for a comprehensive assessment gauging your case’s worth utilizing numerous factors both tangible (monetary expenses like medical bills / lost wages etc.) intangible (pain, suffering etc.). We pride ourselves on delivering exceptional representation coupled impeccable service hence request clicking below facilitating us demonstrating firsthand just how passionately we champion rights of those victimized by bike accidents seeking what rightfully theirs under aegis of justice quite literally – “on wheels”.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oak Forest Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Oak Forest

Areas of Practice in Oak Forest

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing adept legal advice for victims of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Clinical Misconduct

Providing expert legal support for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Responsibility

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying specialist legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Slip Injuries

Expert in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking restitution for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on guiding patients of car accidents get fair recompense for harms and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Accident

Offering specialist legal advice for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Committed to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Impairments

Expert in providing expert legal services for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Undeserved Loss

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in defending persons with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​