FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Oakbrook Terrace

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the distressing aftermath of a dog bite injury in Oakbrook Terrace, always consider Carlson Bier – trusted veterans in personal injury law. Dog bite injuries require immediate, expert legal attention due to their intricate nature and unique sets of governing laws in Illinois. The adept and compassionate lawyers at Carlson Bier not only delve deeply into fighting for your rights but also enable you to understand the complex legal processes involved. These legal champions assertively represent your interests, ensuring you receive fair compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, psychological trauma or any additional costs associated with these harrowing events. What truly distinguishes Carlson Bier is their unyielding commitment to client-focused practice; each case is treated individually with meticulous effort towards mapping out the strategic dynamics required for favorable outcomes. This concrete actionability coupled with decades-long experience makes them an optimal choice when encountering incidents involving dog bite injuries within Oakbrook Terrace’s surroundings.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Oakbrook Terrace Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we prioritize your needs and defend your rights as a personal injury attorney group based in Illinois. In the unfortunate case of dog bite injuries, understanding what to do next can leave you feeling overwhelmed and unsure. With our expert team on your side, we aim to alleviate that stress by providing a detailed guide to navigate through such harrowing incidents.

A dog bite injury isn’t merely an unfortunate occurrence; it’s an adverse event capable of inflicting severe damage – physically, mentally, emotionally, and economically. Studies have shown that over 4 million people are victims of dog bites every year across the United States. Various consequences of these experiences range from significant medical expenses, lost wages due to time spent off work for healing and recovery, right down to long-term physical scars and psychological trauma.

When it comes to dog bite laws in Illinois, there are some critical factors worth mentioning:

• Statute Limitation: You have two years from the date of the canine attack or injury caused by another domestic animal to file a lawsuit.

• Dog Owner Responsibility: Illinois imposes strict liability on pet owners meaning they’re responsible for their pets’ actions regardless if they knew their pet could cause harm.

• Compensation includes medical costs (past & future), loss of earnings capacity due to disfigurement or incapacity amongst others.

Our attorneys at Carlson Bier understand how monumental these traumas can affect individuals – this is why we offer comprehensive legal assistance attuned towards helping clients secure deserved compensation while also recuperating from such traumatic incidents.

We operate not only as lawyers but also facilitators between you and insurance companies involved. Often insurance agencies may try pressuring you into accepting less compensation than you rightly deserve. They employ schemes ensuring minimal company losses amidst promising maximum gains for themselves. But with us in your corner fighting your battle valiantly against any form of exploitation or manipulation tactics from either party responsible for such incident or insurance adjusters, you can rest assured for comprehensive representation that aptly addresses your interests and demands justice.

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our dedicated service towards helping clients understand the pertinent legal procedures surrounding their claims in a straightforward manner. We work closely to build robust cases based on solid evidence like medical reports, eyewitness testimonies and even consultations with veterinary experts if necessary, discussing animosity levels of the animal concerned.

The process often involves initial consultation where we listen to your unfortunate experience followed by evidence collection phase including photographs of injuries sustained and locations, obtaining relevant records then onto case preparation phase where we devise strategies to construct compelling arguments akin to successful litigation or settlement outside court.

It’s not only about winning cases; it’s about ensuring victims find closure amidst traumatic experiences while looking ahead towards surmounting adverse consequences dog bite incident can cause. With continuous pursuit for client equity awareness, we have successfully defended rights and secured substantial compensation amounts legitimate in previous identical cases.

Taking action today is critical because every moment counts when dealing reparation from such an injury occurrence. If you or someone you know has been victimized through a dog bite incident and resides within Illinois jurisdiction, allow us at Carlson Bier to aid you concerning knowing your rights under state laws along with guiding through best courses of action suitable pertaining this situation consideration.

If you’d like further insight into how much your case could potentially be worth from professionals having gathered wealth of expertise over years meticulously assisting individuals navigate these complex personal injury lawsuits terrain worry-free…then now!. Your justice awaits at bottom screen – click on button below for unraveled access into plausible entitlements following ill-fated episode against man’s best friend gone rogue scenario. Take control today! You deserve defending!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oakbrook Terrace Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Oakbrook Terrace

Areas of Practice in Oakbrook Terrace

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Extending specialist legal assistance for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Clinical Negligence

Providing professional legal support for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Handling cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal services to victims affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Stumble Incidents

Adept in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Harms

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Collisions: Focused on supporting individuals of car accidents receive just recompense for injuries and harm.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Incident

Delivering expert legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Building Site Accidents

Engaged in assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Committed to ensuring specialized legal assistance for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Damages

Skilled in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Focused on defending victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440