...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Orangeville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you or a loved one experienced a dog bite injury in Orangeville? You need the focused expertise of Carlson Bier at your side. Our legal team, comprising skilled Dog Bite Injuries attorneys, have won substantial compensation for victims across Illinois. With keen knowledge of state laws and profound understanding of these unique cases’ sensitive nature, we assure aggressive representation to achieve justice for our clients. Our firm’s high successfully resolved cases rate stands testimony to our commitment towards each case. We navigate meticulously through all complexities involved, ensuring that negligent parties are held accountable and fair compensation is achieved encompassing medical expenses, trauma counseling costs and other financial impact factors related to the incident. When working with Carlson Bier on your claim for Dog Bite Injuries, you can anticipate compassion paired with fierce advocacy – highlighting why so many choose us when in dire need of competent legal assistance.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Orangeville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and confusion that arises from suffering a dog bite injury. Our attorneys are well-versed in Illinois laws pertaining to such incidents and possess a wealth of experience handling these types of personal injury cases. We have deep empathy for those unfortunate enough to be victims of dogs and other domestic animals who may unexpectedly turn aggressive. For over several years, our legal team has been securing justice for innocent people harmed by dog bites.

Dog-bite injuries can take various forms but often include scratches, severe cuts, tissue damage, or even psychological trauma. Some attacks result in serious infections like rabies or tetanus which could lead to substantial medical costs related cold sweats at night regarding this harrowing event. It is imperative that you receive appropriate medical attention immediately after a dog bite to prevent any far-reaching health complications.

Complications arising from a dog bite don’t end with physical discomfort; they also extend into financial distress due to mounting medical bills or lost income if your ability to work is hindered as shown by the bullet points below:

• Extensive surgeries or treatments required after an attack

• Recurring visits for wound dressing and check-ups

• Costly medications possibly needed for pain management, infection control, etc.

• Physical therapy sessions designed towards restoring normal mobility

• Potential lengthy period off work interrupting earnings flow

No victim should have to bear these burdens alone, especially when the incident results from negligence on part of the pet’s owner or caregiver. At Carlson Bier law firm based in Illinois, we firmly believe in holding responsible parties accountable.

The Illinois Animal Control Act mandates that owners must exercise reasonable care and control over their pets all times regardless of breed changes if proven aggressive tendencies exist within specific breeds in communities across our state(illinois). The Act allows victims of animal attacks mostly being able to sue not only negligent owners but third-party landlords possibly knew about animosity amongst tenants regarding pets kept within close quarters.

Just like other personal injury cases, understanding the actual worth of your dog bite case demands insight into various aspects. Our expert attorneys will meticulously review all facets surrounding your encounter: from medical costs and lost earnings to long-term effects and psychological trauma endured over time.

At Carlson Bier, you are more than just a case; you are an individual who deserves respect, dedicated support and unyielding commitment aimed at ensuring maximum compensation under Illinois law. We manage each case personally, never passing it off onto paralegals or junior associates as most firms normally would implying their own importance above client’s welfare. Instead, our senior partners will always be there for guiding through every step in this complex legal process.

Remember – we operate on a contingency basis meaning no upfront fees unless we achieve a favorable outcome for your situation. Your peace of mind is paramount to us throughout the entire ordeal because seeing clients uplifted after such harrowing experiences proves immensely satisfying beyond any financial incentives involved for us.

Your ability to recover both physically and financially should not be compromised due to someone else’s negligence. As champions of victims’ rights throughout Illinois state , let us evaluate circumstances surrounding your incident help navigate treacherous terrain towards securing rightful justice owed without further delay

Curious about what you could potentially receive as compensation? Tap into our extensive knowledge base by clicking on the button below to get in touch with one of our seasoned professionals for an evaluation consultation revolving around specifics tied up within unique dog-bite injury scenario plaguing life since occurrence—no strings attached promise holds true starting initial discussions through final settlement if achieving agreement becomes reality down line given taking onboard experienced advocacy representing interest alone.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Orangeville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Orangeville

Areas of Practice in Orangeville

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Damages

Extending skilled legal services for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering dedicated legal assistance for victims affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Trip Accidents

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Harms

Providing legal help for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Crashes: Concentrated on guiding sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable recompense for harms and harm.

Motorbike Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Big Rig Crash

Offering specialist legal assistance for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Worksite Crashes

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Traumas

Expert in ensuring dedicated legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Adept at handling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal services to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in supporting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​