Wrongful Death Attorney in Orangeville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we provide comprehensive and competent representation for wrongful death cases. Our team of expert attorneys has an unyielding commitment to justice, especially when it involves the untimely end of a loved one’s life due to negligence or intent. With years of proven efficacy under our belts, we have honed both strategic skills and familiarity with Illinois laws that will maximize your chances at a successful outcome.

Amid the overwhelming devastation that often accompanies wrongful death situations, legal complexities may seem daunting. That’s where Carlson Bier comes in – we break down these intricate matters into understandable language while meticulously fighting on behalf of our clients’ rights.

Whether you are dealing with insurance companies or negligent parties, know well that we relentlessly pursue what is fair and just for you without compromise. We don’t rest until every appropriate measure is taken towards providing consolation in monetary terms as far as allowed by law.

If confronting such distressing circumstances in Orangeville regarding wrongful death claims – remember this: Your fight becomes ours too once entrusted to us at Carlson Bier because here, compassion intersects expertise.

About Carlson Bier

Wrongful Death Lawyers in Orangeville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in pursuing justice for wrongful death cases while compassionately guiding families through the legal process. Located solely in Illinois, our experienced personal injury attorneys use their extensive knowledge and expertise to help build a solid case while striving to achieve the maximum possible compensation for your tragic loss.

Wrongful death refers to cases where an individual’s negligent or intentional actions result in the death of another person. When tragedy strikes because of someone else’s negligence, surviving members can file a wrongful death suit seeking various forms of damage outputs. This could include financial compensation to cover medical expenses incurred before death, burial costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, as well as loss of companionship.

Significant points about wrongful deaths that are essential to understand are:

-Only select kinships have standing to sue including surviving spouses, children or sometimes indirect relatives.

-Most states impose a time frame on filing these claims; largely within 1-2 years from the individual’s passing.

-Wrongful death suits can be filed even if criminal charges have either not been instigated or were unsuccessful against the perpetrator.

-The burden of proof falls on civil standard: ‘preponderance of evidence,’ which translates into proving it is more likely than not that the defendant’s conduct caused or contributed to the demise.

It’s crucial that full investigation commences swiftly following any horrible incident with due consideration given to preserving relevant evidence promptly; valuable insight can often be gleaned by timely recorded accounts from witnesses at scene rather than relying upon recollections much later -these endeavors all aimed toward securing favorable outcome when litigating deserved claims for tweaked damages sought by survivors suffering untold adversity as occasioned by unfortunate fatal events..

Choosing Carlson Bier ensures you’re dealing with seasoned professionals who ardently apply their acute awareness of nuances and intricacies in complex Wrongful Death law depth-breadth informing each individually crafted strategy devised underpinned belief every life holds infinite worth; thus eulogizing legacy departed loved ones through justice served.

Understanding the pain and immense grief of losing a loved one in such circumstances is hard on the bereaved. We value personal relationships with our clients based on mutual trust – we do not perceive you as simply another case number. While we help process what has happened, our strategy revolves around one fundamental objective: to ensure that the negligent parties pay for their careless actions both monetarily and morally.

Our attorneys understand how financial hardships caused by sudden loss can further complicate matters for grieving families. Our dedication to achieving maximum compensation isn’t just about levying fines on those responsible; it’s also about helping victims find some peace amidst tremors of adversity affecting their daily life in untold ways–think lessening financial worries associated planning funerals maybe putting pending medical bills rest or ensuring future living standards surviving family members aren’t compromised because lost income flow.

Navigating grief is rough enough without adding legal complexities into mix – Carlson Bier hereby pledges undivided attention coupled empathetic understanding let alone unwavering commitment relentlessly pursuing justice every client serving nothing short fervent representation armed demonstrably strong record triumph stupendous scale individual perseverance ardor enabling us press claims forward when most challenged thereby firmly setting us apart among peers rightfully earning respect admiration from within esteemed legal fraternity across Illinois state.

Take your critical first step towards gaining closure today; click below to uncover the intricacies of your unique case, and find out its potential worth under Carlson Bier’s skilled assessment steadfastly powered by informed perspectives shaping paths toward desired resolutions. Let us shoulder your legal burdens during this trying time, freeing you to focus purely on healing while remembering enshrined memories epitomizing essence loved ones tragically taken too soon secure knowledge no stone will be left unturned questing rightful justice reached all-inclusive satisfaction achieved!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Orangeville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Wrongful Death FAQ​

Wrongful death occurs when a person’s death is caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person.

The following people may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit:

  • The spouse or children of the deceased
  • The parents of the deceased
  • The siblings of the deceased
  • The personal representative of the deceased’s estate

To prove a wrongful death claim in Illinois, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:

  • The defendant owed the deceased a duty of care.
  • The defendant breached that duty of care.
  • The breach of duty caused the death of the deceased.
  • The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the death of the deceased.

In a wrongful death lawsuit in Illinois, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include lost wages, medical expenses, and funeral expenses.
  • Non-pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the non-financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and loss of parental guidance.

The statute of limitations for wrongful death lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the death to file a lawsuit.

If you have any questions about your legal rights or options after a wrongful death, you should contact an experienced wrongful death attorney.

All Attorney Services in Orangeville

Areas of Practice in Orangeville

Bike Crashes

Proficient in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying adept legal support for victims of grave burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering experienced legal representation for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal services to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Trip Incidents

Professional in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on aiding patients of car accidents gain equitable settlement for harms and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal services for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Providing experienced legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Building Site Accidents

Engaged in assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in ensuring compassionate legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Backbone Injury

Specializing in advocating for victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer