FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Patoka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a spinal cord injury can have life-altering implications, leaving you grappling with physical pain, emotional trauma and substantial medical bills. During this challenging time, having an experienced law firm such as Carlson Bier supporting your claim for compensation can make all the difference. For decades, Carlson Bier has been representing individuals across Illinois dealing specifically with spinal cord injuries situations. Our carefully crafted legal strategies reflect our extensive expertise in handling complex personal injury cases and exhibit our steadfast commitment to achieving maximum compensation for our clients. Approachable yet authoritative; innovative yet grounded in experience; we are proud of being consistently recognized among top-drawer attorneys due to our tenacious advocacy and superior client service standards. Regardless of your situation or location within the state of Illinois – from Patoka to Cairo–you deserve best-in-class representation when pursuing justice following a traumatic spinal cord injury incident – and this is precisely what Carlson Bier delivers every single time.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Patoka Illinois

At the prestigious law firm of Carlson Bier, we understand that ailments such as spinal cord injuries can dramatically alter the course of a person’s life. Dubbed as one our areas of expertise under personal injury law, we take pride in fostering an atmosphere where clients feel respected and cared for throughout their journey for justice.

A deeper understanding of spinal cord injuries provides crucial context for those affected by them, offering insights into both prevention and future courses of action. Spinal cord injuries refer to instances of damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves within the spinal canal. The severity often depends on whether the injury is complete or incomplete, with the former causing full loss of motor function and sensory below its level, while in incomplete injuries some functionality may remain.

Spinal cord injuries significantly impact one’s daily life, inflicting massive changes which are vital to anticipate early on. • You may experience discomfort or trauma due to symptoms such as pain or intense stinging sensation caused by nerve fiber damage • Limited mobility could necessitate home modifications or adaptive devices • Major lifestyle alterations like needing caregiving help for everyday activities • Psychological effects including bouts of depression and anxiety

Keeping abreast with these implications will add clarity when dealing with insurance companies and assist in comprehending your rights better under Illinois Law.

Legal recourse plays an essential role in ensuring adequate compensation after a traumatic event like this occurs, given most individuals lack ample preparation for confronting such unforeseen circumstances. Often it becomes paramount to have adept legal representation by your side safeguarding your rights against injustice amidst adversity.

Carlson Bier boasts a deep pool of well-experienced personal injury attorneys who are seasoned advocates when it comes transactions surrounding insurance claims processes and subsequent negotiations post-accident incidents involving spinal cord damages.

Our dedicated team of professionals operates tirelessly towards securing optimal compensation packages tailored suitably according to client’s needs and covers ongoing medical costs commonly coupled along with rehabilitation expenses creeping up over time.

Besides, our law practitioners are seasoned at navigating complex courtroom dynamics expertly to get you the best possible outcome. We ensure your case is thoroughly prepared for trial if out-of-court settlements fail to render fair compensation.

Anchoring strong core values of transparency, integrity, and empathy by adept attorneys at Carlson Bier ensures that we embrace a ‘client-first’ approach consistently. With us, every step in your legal journey triggers strategic decisions, which are executed with profound judgement keeping in consideration numerous facets like individual client requirements, dynamic external factors influencing the case and employing realistic approaches towards strategizing potential roadmap tactics aiming ultimate victory for you—a testament of combining our rich experience and technical profundity along these lines sets us apart as industry leaders in Illinois.

Lastly, taking prompt action post spinal cord injury can prove pivotal towards accelerating viable reimbursement measures aimed at allowing victims return back to normalcy following such unfortunate events. Henceforth trust the expertise of Carlson Bier—the leading personal injury attorney firm committed wholly towards transforming lives positively amidst grave adversity.

At Carlson Bier, we serve righteousness with dedication! To explore more about how would could guide you through this ordeal or evaluate your case’s worth promptly click on the button below. Align yourself with exceptional legal guidance—your prosperous future begins here!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Patoka Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Patoka

Areas of Practice in Patoka

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Supplying adept legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending dedicated legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, offering professional legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Abuse

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Fall Accidents

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Damages

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Committed to aiding victims of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Bike Accidents

Expert in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in delivering specialized legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Fatality

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Damage

Dedicated to representing persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​