...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Patoka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Patoka, ensuring strong representation is crucial. This is where Carlson Bier excels, as they are recognized leaders offering personalized legal services specifically tailored for dog bite injuries. With extensive experience handling these types of personal injury cases across Illinois, their depth of expertise and positive track record set them apart from other law firms.

Strategically navigating each case’s unique circumstances with an ardent commitment to securing fair compensation for each client – this defines Carlson Bier’s service approach. Their comprehensive knowledge of relevant laws helps ensure adherence to all state guidelines as they strongly advocate on behalf of those who have suffered due to dog bite attacks.

Choosing from available legal options in the wake of such trauma can be overwhelming but choosing Campbell Bier means opting for attentive guidance through your situation; it means selecting dependable ally who hold your best interest at heart – regardless if you’re contending with insurance adjustments or pursuing a lawsuit.

Remember when dealing with Dog Bite Injuries; nothing beats having competent hands handle your situation – think Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Patoka Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in a wide array of personal injury cases. Today, we shift our spotlight to one such area of concern – Dog Bite injuries. Navigating the consequences of a dog bite can be complex and emotional. Our dedicated attorneys draw upon their extensive experience and intricate knowledge to ensure that you are adequately represented.

Understanding the impact and nuances of dog-bite incidents is crucial in comprehensively addressing all legal aspects.

• Severity varies: Dog bites may vary from minor cuts to critical wounds that could lead to permanent damage or serious health complications.

• Psychological trauma: Beyond physical harm, victims are frequently susceptible to enduring psychological distress post-incident.

• Financial burden: The cost incurred during treatment spans from hospitalization bills to rehabilitation costs, significantly straining an individual’s financial resources.

In Illinois, specific laws pertain explicitly to dog-bite injuries. Predominantly,

Duplication• Strict-liability state: Illinois operates under what is called ‘strict liability’ when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is legally responsible for any damages caused by their pet biting someone else unless the person bitten was trespassing or provoking the animal.

• Defined timeframe: As stipulated by Illinois law statutes on limitations related to personal injury cases including dog bites, it’s essential you file your claim within two years from when your injury occurred.

One should not fail in obtaining appropriate medical care after being bitten by a dog, irrespective of its severity. Here’s how and why:

• For minor wounds: Immediately cleanse the wound with warm soapy water and apply an antibacterial ointment followed by covering with a clean bandage.

• In case of severe bites: If bleeding heavily or bitten by an unfamiliar or non-vaccinated dog then seek professional emergency medical help as soon as possible.

Besides fulfilling these immediate steps following a dog bite incident:

– Report it right away

– Gather evidence and identify eyewitnesses

– Consult a knowledgeable attorney: This is where the Carlson Bier team enters.

Navigating through the complexities of dog bite injury lawsuits requires expert legal representation, and at Carlson Bier we offer exactly that. Our acumen fortified by our proven track record has poised us aptly to handle your case, no matter how complex it may be. We endeavor to make sense of it all for you, ensuring that while we concentrate on building your strongest legal position, you focus exclusively on regaining your health and moving forward from this traumatic event.

Our dedication goes beyond delivering quality legal services; we strive to bring ease into your life during chaotic times. At Carlson Bier, you receive total transparency with regular updates about the progress of your case – a trusted partner in your course towards justice.

Remember, if you’ve experienced a dog bite in Illinois, time is a crucial factor in claiming compensation for damages incurred both physically and emotionally. Unfortunately, as experts say many victims often miss out on their rightful claims either due to lack of information or fear of navigating an intimidating legal process—leaving them bearing burdens they should not have endured alone. At Carlson Bier, our commitment extends genuinely in ensuring such regrettable instances do not happen.

Therefore, don’t wait any longer! If you or anyone known to you has been affected by a dog-bite incident recently or even years ago within Illinois’s defined statute limitations – let us help lead the way toward justice. We warmly invite you to click on the button below – determine what kind of compensation could be realistically achieved and alleviate any unease related to costs or financial risks linked with pursuing claims through trial. Remember – You pay absolutely nothing until we win monetary recovery for your case.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Patoka Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Patoka

Areas of Practice in Patoka

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving expert legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering expert legal services for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal services to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Tumble Occurrences

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal help for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents get reasonable compensation for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering specialist legal assistance for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Building Site Mishaps

Dedicated to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to offering professional legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Death

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Damage

Dedicated to representing victims with vertebral damage, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​