FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Paw Paw

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the bustling town of Paw Paw, construction site accidents are an unfortunate reality. They can cause serious harm and disrupt lives profoundly. It becomes imperative then to select a proficient legal advocate like Carlson Bier who will champion your rights fearlessly in these challenging times. As seasoned Construction Site Accident Attorneys, they understand intricacies associated with Illinois’ laws, advocating tirelessly for those impacted by workplace mishaps. Crucial experience and knowledge differentiate them, ensuring that clients receive personalized attention often lost among larger firms. Their track record is studded with commendable victories—proof of their relentless pursuit for justice on behalf of every client each day. At Carlson Bier aiming for maximum compensation is standard practice; helped immensely by skillfully managed negotiations or compelling courtroom representation where required. If you happen to grapple with the aftermaths of a dreadful construction accident, rely on the specialized expertise at Carlson Bier- staunch supporters of victims as they navigate the complexities thrown their way without compromising personal care and dedication.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Paw Paw Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, where our personal injury attorneys have an unwavering commitment and sterling track record in representing victims of construction site accidents. Being based in Illinois, we have a comprehensive understanding of the state’s laws surrounding these incidents, thereby lending us the expertise to handle your case with meticulous attention to detail.

Construction site accidents involve a range of occupational hazards that can cause severe injuries or even death. They may result from various risks including but not limited to: falling materials or debris; unsecured scaffolding; improper use or maintenance of machinery and equipment as well as exposure to harmful substances on-site.

• Falling Material: Construction sites often feature large quantities of heavy material being transported around the premises. Equipment failure, negligence, or any fault could lead this material to be unintentionally dropped onto unsuspecting workers below resulting in significant harm.

• Unsecured Scaffolding: Employers have a legal duty to ensure scaffolding is secure on worksites. A failure in doing so potentially paves way for catastrophic falls leading up-to grievous injuries.

• Machinery/Equipment Misuse: Many accidents occur due to the misuse or poor maintenance of machines and tools. This risk underscores the importance of appropriate training before operation and timely servicing requirements are met.

• Harmful Substance Exposure: Workers at times face exposure to hazardous materials such as asbestos leading up-to serious health complications down the line.

By filing a claim for these types of accidents you may be entitled compensation for medical bills associated with your injury, lost wages both present and future, plus other damages like physical pain or emotional trauma you’ve endured as a result.

The Law Office team at Carlson Bier understands every minute matters when it comes to construction accident cases – through experience having successfully represented many clients under similar circumstances efficiently making way towards fair settlements arrive within due time allotted by law

In pursuit of justice for our injured clients, Carlson Bier doesn’t just manage claims—we fight for what is rightly due, demonstrating strong client representation coupled with unwavering resilience. With our personal injury attorneys at your side, you can expect relentless advocacy at every stage of the process.

Have you or a loved one suffered harm due to a construction site accident? The path to rightful compensation begins here at Carlson Bier. Our experienced team would be pleased to assist in navigating these complex circumstances ensuring that your interests are pursued diligently and professionally.

Begin the journey towards achieving justice today by clicking on the button below. This will help us assess your case and provide vital information about potential claim value. At Carlson Bier, we chart the course forward by prioritizing your wellbeing and financial stability above all else.

Remember – time is of the essence! Don’t allow statutory restrictions to limit or prevent your ability for just compensation; let our attorneys advise you as soon as possible following any incident involving construction site accidents. It’s essential we take swift action to protect not only your rights but also maximize chances for full recovery – both health-wise and financially speaking.

At Carlson Bier, it’s more than just about winning cases — it’s about ensuring you get back on track after a traumatic event. We’re with you every step of the way through this challenging journey towards reclaiming security, ample restitution and when required, initiating reformative changes making worksites safer for all.

Feel confident that our reputation as detailed-oriented attorneys precedes us – Click on the button below NOW and find out how much YOUR case could potentially be worth; it’s time YOUR voice was heard!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Paw Paw Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Paw Paw

Areas of Practice in Paw Paw

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying adept legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing dedicated legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Responsibility

Managing cases involving defective products, extending expert legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Trip Occurrences

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking redress for their damages.

Infant Damages

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Incidents: Concentrated on aiding patients of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for hurts and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing experienced legal representation for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for injuries.

Construction Site Crashes

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Expert in defending clients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440