FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Pittsburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been the victim of a dog bite injury in Pittsburg, the expert team at Carlson Bier is ready to advocate for your rights. Dog injuries can be severe, leading not only to physical pain but also emotional trauma and substantial medical bills. With decades of comprehensive experience in personal injury law, we’re fully prepared to pursue compensation on your behalf. Our proven track record and dedication are key indicators that you’ll receive steadfast representation from us. At Carlson Bier, we comprehend both Illinois law intricacies as well as specific guidelines around dog bite cases prevailing in Pittsburg region; thus providing specialized legal counsel catered to your needs. As relentless advocates for victims’ rights, our aim is easing the burden on clients by holding responsible parties accountable whilst guiding them towards rightful compensation recovery journey they deserve in these unfortunate circumstances. Successful resolution and client satisfaction remain our driving force; choose Carlson Bier where wisdom meets vigor making us an excellent choice for representing your dog bite case.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Pittsburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our exceptional team of professional personal injury attorneys is well-versed and experienced in the legal complexities surrounding Dog Bite Injuries. Our Illinois-based law firm takes pride in leading victims through their unique situation by offering comprehensive guidance and representation every step of the way.

Dog bites can be traumatizing and cause significant physical harm and psychological distress. We understand your predicament if you or a loved one have been bitten by a dog. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), approximately 4.5 million individuals are bitten by dogs each year in the U.S., with nearly 20% requiring medical attention. The repercussions often go beyond mere flesh wounds, including severe infections, permanent disfigurement, nerve damage, scarring along with potential emotional trauma which constitute substantial elements when building your claim.

Key factors that affect dog bite cases include:

• Establishing Ownership: Identifying the correct owner of the dog is an essential first step towards filing a strong lawsuit.

• Evidence Collection: This includes medical records detailing your injuries, photographs of injuries and attack location, witness testimonies, etc.

• Dog Leash Laws: Another critical aspect to consider whether there was conformity to local leash laws at the time of occurrence. Violation on part of owner strengthens victim’s case significantly.

We believe that thorough understanding empowers action hence we strive to keep you informed about Illinois’ Dog Bite Law; it governs personal injury claims related to dog bites under what is known as ‘strict liability.’ This means owners are held liable if their pet harms someone regardless if they were aware or had no prior knowledge about dog’s violent tendencies unless it involved trespassing or provocation from victim’s end.

The statute requires filing within two years from date of incident but initiating process sooner greatly assists with capturing evidence while memories remain fresh.

Another important point worthy mentioning is homeowner’s insurance policies since many will cover damages resulting from dog bites. Our expert attorneys will adeptly navigate these insurance complexities ensuring you receive the compensation you justifiably deserve.

Our team at Carlson Bier takes every case seriously, no matter its scale or intensity. We strive to bring justice and peace of mind to victims dealing with such traumatic incidents which is why advocating for your best interest remains our constant priority.

Our success lies in commitment towards consistently delivering favorable results coupled with unmatched customer service – hearing relief from satisfied clients who can move on after a tragic event is what drives us daily.

At this point, you might ask, “Well, how much is my case worth?” That’s a great question! Amount of potential recovery varies between cases due to distinct factors including circumstances surrounding the incident, severity of injury/trauma and financial losses incurred as result ex-medical bills, loss of wages including considerations towards future implications such as disability leading to job displacement or need for long-term psychological care. It’s crucial having legal experts examine individual elements of your situation while continuously updating records about state legislature amendments that could affect your claim value.

🌟 Attention: The details that make up a successful dog bite injury claim can be intricate and overwhelming without legal expertise backing it up – don’t let that discourage you in pursuing rightful compensation!

As Illinois-based law firm focused on Personal Injury cases over many years – we’ve achieved impressive track record by leveraging deep knowledge combined with aggressive representation skills against responsible parties/insurers shielding our clients from stress enabling them focus completely on healing journey.

Ready to explore further based perhaps now? Click below for a FREE evaluation- get an estimate indicative of how much your personal injury case may be potentially worth under guidance from one of our seasoned Dog Bite Attorneys!

By taking action today- tomorrow heals…Let Carlson Bier champion on behalf of YOU!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pittsburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Pittsburg

Areas of Practice in Pittsburg

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Supplying adept legal help for victims of major burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal advice for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal assistance to customers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Trip Occurrences

Skilled in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Committed to assisting individuals of car accidents get reasonable compensation for harms and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Expert in providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Big Rig Accident

Ensuring adept legal support for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Head Harms

Specializing in extending specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​