FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Richmond

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the traumatic aftermath of dog bite injuries in Richmond, it’s crucial to immediately secure experienced legal representation. Carlson Bier is a respected personal injury law firm whose unmatchable expertise in the field of Dog Bite Injuries is recognized throughout Illinois. Our team understands that you’re not just confronting medical bills and recovery, but complex laws regarding liability as well! The labyrinthine depths of these legal intricacies require proficient navigation from industry professionals – we at Carlson Bier stand ready to provide such elite service. With our vast legal experience and deep commitment to each client’s rights, we passionately advocate for those impacted by dog bite injuries, ensuring victims receive maximum compensation available under Illinois law. Entrust your case to us: loyal companions who seek justice with formidable tenacity and unfaltering compassion just like Man’s Best Friend would expect for their masters’ safekeeping from predatory tendencies within society; where vulnerability should never compromise one’s safety nor peace! Consider Carlson Bier today for seamless fortification against future perils heralded by unwarranted aggressors amidst otherwise loving creatures.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Richmond Illinois

When you or a loved one encounters the unfortunate event of a dog bite injury, it could result in a grimacing experience full of pain, emotional trauma and shaken confidence. This is where the skilled practitioners at Carlson Bier step in to ensure your rights are protected. Based proudly in Illinois, our dedicated team deeply understands that dog bite injuries are serious matters which can sometimes lead to threatening complications. These include potential infection risks such as Rabies or Tetanus; physical impairments like nerve damage, disfigurement – especially facial scarring when children are involved; and last but not least psychological aftermaths including severe anxiety issues due to the traumatic incident.

Dog bites may seem commonplace but its consequences could be far-reaching affecting victims on multiple levels:

– Significant medical cost for treatment and post-treatment rehabilitation

– Lost wages during the recovery period

– Potential long-term mental health costs related to fear, anxiety, or PTSD

With this underscores our commitment at Carlson Bier., our principal aim is to facilitate comprehensive legal coverage for victims of dog bite incidents. Being well-versed with Illinois Dog Bite Statute (510 ILCS 5/16), we horne carefully-crafted strategies enhancing victim’s chances of receiving substantial monetary recoveries for their incurred damages. The statute essentially comprises nuanced aspects important for any personal injury case: proof that the defendant owns the subject animal; whether the animal was provoked by victim directly/indirectly before causing harm; And if so was committed without any prompt legal retribution.

Our work methodology involves an exhaustive study of your case and robust preparation building relentless advocacy targeting maximum compensation. Each investigation initiated by our experienced attorneys aims to gather compelling evidence supporting claims including –

– Thorough documentation – photographic/video proofs featuring injury severity and scenario explanation.

– Accessing variety of records – Medical reports backing extent of physical/emotional trauma sustained; verification reports affirming offending party’s ownership over implicated dog etc.

– Incorporating witness testimonies & expert evidences strengthening your case.

Carlson Bier personal injury attorney group stand firmly with you from day one till the conclusion of your case and are hailed for their unwavering dedication. They meticulously argue in court to persuade juries about aggravating factors typifying dog attacks, thereby pressuring defendant to settle claims in a fair manner. Powers vested by Illinois law also let us serve official lawsuits against offending party demanding due justice for caused sufferings. This process extracts vital concessions such as timely medical bill settlements, lost wage coverage or professional mental health counselling – making clients’ lives better after traumatic episodes.

Walking this tightrope between healing and legal procedures can feel daunting, especially when rest should be priority. Regardless, we emphasize the importance of seeking immediate legal help post a dog bite incident– as per Illinois Dog Bite Statute specifies an accelerated statute limitations expiring within two years. Delaying could mean losing valuable rights over potential damage compensations necessary for your recovery path.

We cordially invite victims of such unfortunate incidents to reach out to Carlson Bier- Personal Injury Attorneys Group who are ready and equipped to understand their unique circumstances while providing proficient guidance on all multidimensional aspects surrounding it. Your journey towards reaching justice starts from clicking that button below! Navigate through our consultation process where each step aims at illuminating what your case is worth along with how we plan anchoring it effectively securing favorable outcomes – financial and emotional recoupment leading your life back into stability.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Richmond Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Richmond

Areas of Practice in Richmond

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing skilled legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Extending experienced legal representation for persons affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, extending adept legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Geriatric Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Slip Occurrences

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking compensation for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on aiding victims of car accidents receive reasonable settlement for harms and harm.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing expert legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for injuries.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Injuries

Dedicated to providing specialized legal advice for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Undeserved Demise

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​