FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Richton Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with spinal cord injuries, the expert legal representation provided by Carlson Bier is pivotal for obtaining appropriate compensation. Our highly skilled and reputable attorneys bring insight and commitment to challenging cases arising from the Richton Park area. Navigating the complexities of a spinal cord injury claim requires expertise, something that’s at the heart of our practice at Carlson Bier. From accurately establishing liability to negotiating potential settlements, our talented team works tirelessly on your behalf. The journey post-spinal injury can be daunting; however, our clients in Richton Park consistently appreciate our proactive communication and comprehensive legal care which all become instrumental parts of their recovery process. Seeking rightful compensation becomes more achievable once you choose us as your partner in this strenuous legal battle ahead. Trusting Carlson Bier means choosing an ally who understands both sides – medical repercussions due to a devastating spinal cord trauma, and its resultant financial strains too conspicuously imposed upon you.We stand by our record: we’re here for you when it matters most because with Carlson Bier justice isn’t just a concept but a working reality.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Richton Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that coping with a spinal cord injury can be overwhelming. Navigating through the intricacies of your legal rights while dealing with healing and recovery is not an easy task; it’s physically daunting as well as emotionally demanding. As dedicated personal injury lawyers based in Illinois, we’re committed to providing insightful knowledge and comprehensive support wrapped within these lines of text.

Spinal cord injuries are life-altering events that bear vital implications on one’s lifestyle and societal roles. They primarily stem from severe accidents such as industrial mishaps, car crashes, or slips and falls. They damage or sever the connection between your brain and body leading to reduced mobility or paralysis.

Chronic pain, loss of sensation along with impaired bowel control are among the indelible consequences you may face due to spinal cord injuries. Noteworthy is how this strain tends to affect people differently depending upon their age, health condition prior to the accident and most essentially – ‘the nature of their injury.’ Considering all these facets into account drastically impacts noting down effective recovery strategies.

• Physical Therapy: Preserving physical fitness might feel demanding initially but undoubtedly contributes significantly toward achieving long-standing results.

• Counseling: Emotional support constitutes an indispensable tool during the phases of psychological breakdowns.

• Occupational Therapy: Gearing towards managing daily tasks effectively irrespective of perceived ‘disabilities.’

Our approach at Carlson Bier earnestly takes root in deep understanding coupled with legal expertise for comprehending each particular scenario closely before drawing up a strategic roadmap structured around rightful justice for our clients.

There exists several components when acknowledging fair compensation against spinal cord injuries by law:

• Medical expenses including current bills along with future prognosis considering medical inflation.

• Lost wage due to inability or decreased ability to work post-incident.

• Pain & Suffering accounting for ongoing emotional turmoil feeding off disrupted family relationships cum social engagements.

Investigative Representation’ encapsulates primal framework at Carlson Bier where we inspect case complexities from every potential perspective with intent to provide you justifiable outcomes rightfully deserved.

The litigation process, although undeniably intricate, underpins our consistent efforts in bringing forth the best desirable results for our clients. Time is integral in personal injury claims, hence it necessitates prompt action after an accident. By law, there’s a ‘statute of limitations’, or a period within which lawsuit must be filed against liable parties involved. This duration could vary depending on different type of injuries and other factors such as age of the individual injured.

Our constant aim at Carlson Bier remains deciphering legal jargon into user-friendly language accessible by all community members regardless of their background or experience levels.

Before proceeding any further, envision yourself carving exciting possibilities by clicking the button below taking that vital first step towards finding ‘how much your case might be worth’. The value calculator will guide you through precise answer here based on certain criteria imbibed deep within Illinois laws.

At Carlson Bier – expect nothing but complete transparency complemented with a professional yet compassionate approach derived through years’ worth accumulated expertise amidst Iowa laws and beyond. Rest assured, we believe firmly in fighting relentlessly till justice prevails; for what better satisfaction lies than witnessing reflected smiles on client faces inspiring our journey forward!

Putting forth such high-quality narrative content aims to acquaint one and all with elementary understanding about spinal cord injuries while addressing affiliated legal obligations least one feels overwhelmed during unfortunate events similar to these!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Richton Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Richton Park

Areas of Practice in Richton Park

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Supplying specialist legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Clinical Malpractice

Extending specialist legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Liability

Taking on cases involving faulty products, providing skilled legal support to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Fall Accidents

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Newborn Traumas

Offering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Car Accidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to aiding individuals of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for injuries and losses.

Motorbike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Big Rig Incident

Offering specialist legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for hurts.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Injuries

Dedicated to providing expert legal services for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Backbone Trauma

Committed to assisting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​