...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Ridgway

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a dog bite injury can be distressing, both physically and mentally. Carlson Bier understands the extensive damage these incidents cause. Renowned across Illinois for expert legal representation in personal injury cases, they have successfully championed many clients dealing with dog bite injuries in Ridgway. Their commitment and proficiency are dogs’ clear choice when seeking efficient legal assistance concerning canine attacks within the city’s limits. This firm possesses an expansive depth of knowledge about statutes specific to this area, giving them an unbeatable edge in understanding your case from all angles. Priding themselves on their attentive approach, at Carlson Bier every detail is crucial; meticulously analyzing each aspect allows them to craft compelling arguments that honor their client’s ordeal and maximizes the potential for favorable rulings or settlements.

With unwavering dedication to justice coupled with excellent courtroom expertise, they represent your best option after facing a harrowing episode involving dog aggression in Ridgway or neighboring areas — superior defense that you deserve following such traumatic events.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Ridgway Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to providing unmatched legal assistance and representation for victims of personal injuries in Illinois, with a distinct emphasis on dog bite injury cases. Dog bites can cause severe physical and emotional trauma that may result in mounting medical costs and lost wages due to indisposition. As such, it’s critical to seek professional legal services to ensure that you’re adequately compensated for the resulting inconveniences.

Dog bites fall under the umbrella of personal injury law, which is broad with various facets regarding liability and compensation calculation. Our experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier work tirelessly to unpack each case’s intricacies for optimal outcomes. When pursuing a dog bite claim, there are several key factors to keep in mind:

• The dog owner’s liability: In Illinois, the owner is “strictly liable” for any harm their pet causes unless the victim has provoked the animal.

• Knowledge of dangerous propensities: The dog owner might be held accountable if they were aware of their dog’s aggression towards humans prior.

• Documentation of damages: Properly documenting all sustained injuries and post-attack expenses is paramount in building a compelling case.

Dog bite laws vary from state to state; hence understanding your region-specific statutes becomes crucial when filing a claim. For instance, in Illinois, one must prove negligence or liability rather than establishing parameters like ‘one free bite.’ These complexities underscore why engaging our team at Carlson Bier yields more productive results compared to navigating these intricate legal waters alone. Drawing upon our extensive experience across notable cases within this realm allows us to pinpoint common errors and proactively counter them for favorable outcomes.

A successful claim also rests on an accurate valuation of total damages incurred during an incident—both economic (medical bills) and non-economic hardships (pain/suffering). Our detail-oriented approach ensures that each aspect contributing towards your claim’s value – emergency room costs, future medical expenses along with emotional distress suffered – is rightfully accounted for. This commitment enables us to pursue fair compensation, thereby alleviating some of the financial stresses you may be grappling with in the aftermath of an unfortunate event.

Furthermore, Carlson Bier respects your right to confidentiality and diligence throughout this journey. We are well aware that post-traumatic stress can compound the experiences of dog bite victims making it particularly challenging for them to recount disturbing incidents repeatedly. Be assured that our empathetic team will keep these conversations to a minimum while focusing on countering legal challenges swiftly and effectively.

Moreover, we operate under contingency fee agreements — you only pay if we secure compensation successfully on your behalf. Our doors remain open for communication during business hours allowing you transparency into your case’s progress at any time.

We recognize that understanding and navigating personal injury law, specifically in dog bite cases, takes a toll both emotionally and physically on victims. However, patience is fundamental during this process since it often involves comprehensive investigations before reaching negotiations or stepping into courtrooms.

At Carlson Bier, our demonstrated expertise has helped countless Illinois residents receive due settlement amounts catering adequately to their losses from dog bites injuries – proof enough that engaging us means placing yourself in capable hands.

Curious about what your claim might add up to? Don’t hesitate further! Simply click below to find out exactly how much your case is worth with our free consultation service where facts meet accurate estimations. Get started today towards reclaiming control over your life following an unfortunate dog bite incident; join the growing number of satisfied clients who found solace collaborating with us in their quest for justice and adequate remuneration.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Ridgway Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Ridgway

Areas of Practice in Ridgway

Bike Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending adept legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Extending dedicated legal services for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering skilled legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Slip Mishaps

Skilled in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Crashes: Committed to helping victims of car accidents secure equitable settlement for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Semi Crash

Ensuring professional legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Worksite Accidents

Committed to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Specializing in ensuring dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal support to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to advocating for individuals with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​