...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Riverdale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be unnerving, disrupting lives with cascading physical and emotional trauma. Whether you live in Riverdale or any city across Illinois, Carlson Bier offers strong advocacy for dog bite victims. This acclaimed attorney group excels in interpreting intricate Illinois statutes concerning dog bites, lending their hard-won legal prowess to ensure that clients get rightfully compensated for injuries suffered. Both seasoned litigators renowned for the success they command against obstinate insurance companies resist full compensation, Carlsson Bier’s track record speaks beyond borders of keenly fought legal victories and satisfied clients. They bring vast experience in investigating complex scenarios to establish liability accurately and leverages this proficiency tactically to maximize your claim value swiftly achieved through skilled negotiation or triumphant courtroom litigation.

Trust this dependable law firm as it marches forward with singular focus rooted firmly on its commitment towards justice served fairly – making every fight count! Choose the Carlson Bier team as your partners in recuperation ensuring premium legal services without geographical constraints.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Riverdale Illinois

Dog bite injuries can have serious and far-reaching effects on your life, ranging from physical harm to psychological trauma. At Carlson Bier, we fully understand how drastically your life can change due to such an unfortunate incident. As Illinois-based personal injury attorneys with in-depth knowledge of dog bite law, our primary objective is to guide victims through these challenging times and ensure they receive the compensation they deserve.

In many cases, the most devastating aspect of a dog bite are not always evident right away. There could be unseen lacerations, tissue damage, infection risk and even potential emotional scars that could last a lifetime.

• Large medical expenses

• Continued therapy or treatment

• Long-term suffering and emotional distress

These issues should never be ignored or underestimated as they may come into play later on during legal proceedings.

Understanding the laws in place is pivotal when dealing with dog bite incidents in Illinois. The state operates under strict liability for dog bites; which means you do not need to prove that the owner was negligent or knew about the aggressive propensity of their animal for you to seek damages.

Here are key elements surrounding dog bite laws:

• You must prove that you did not provoke the animal before it bit you

• You were conducting yourself peaceably in a location where you had legal right to be

It is also noteworthy that while some states have one-bite rules which free owners from liability if their dogs had no previous history of aggression – this rule does not apply in Illinois. An initial offense still requires full accountability from pet owners.

Navigating through lawsuits involving dog bites could be daunting especially when grappling with recovery at the very same time. Seeking effective legal representation ensures you sidestep additional burdens during your healing process. It’s essential that victims understand they don’t have to fight alone after experiencing a traumatic event like a dog attack; rest assured we will work diligently as an extension of your voice throughout case proceedings offering timely consultations based on your unique case specifics.

At Carlson Bier, our primary goal is aiding you comprehend what lies ahead while striving to give you respite along the way. Let us stand in your corner offering support while translating complex legal terms into straightforward language that helps you make well-informed decisions about your future.

Discussing injuries suffered during a dog attack can be a sensitive experience replicated only by victims. The personalized approach adopted by Carlson Bier promises empathetic discussions coupled with astute professional advice resulting in an entirely seamless claim process for you and your family.

If this seems like a daunting process, fret not; we’re here to guide you every step of the way. Your focus should first and foremost remain directed towards recovery after such life-altering episodes; allow us transform this unfortunate episode into an opportunity to secure just recompense for damages incurred due to negligence of others.

The team at Carlson Bier carries vast knowledge under their belt alongside insightful experience handling personal injury cases across Illinois; we’re committed relentlessly towards helping clients get back onto their feet both emotionally and physically.

Whether it’s submitting paperwork punctually or negotiating assertively with insurance companies – understanding procedural formalities inside out guarantees optimal results in dog bite lawsuits leading eventually to adequate compensation ensuring quality medical care or mental healing therapy for victims post such distressing incidents.

Ready to discover just how much compensation your case may be worth? Remember, as your personal injury attorney group, its within our best interests that clients fully understand the true value of their claims against parties responsible akin to securing justice served promptly yet prudently. With optimism bundled up tight, click on the button below today to start this journey together using unparalleled expertise coupled with unwavering empathy carried heartily through Carlson Bier.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Riverdale Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Riverdale

Areas of Practice in Riverdale

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Extending professional legal help for victims of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal representation for victims affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving faulty products, delivering professional legal help to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Tumble Mishaps

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Wounds

Offering legal help for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to guiding clients of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for hurts and losses.

Scooter Mishaps

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Trucking Crash

Providing professional legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on ensuring professional legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in representing persons with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer