FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Riverside

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re facing the aftermath of a dog bite injury, trust in the expertise of Carlson Bier. We understand the physical and emotional scars such incidents can inflict, as well as their potential legal complexity. As an esteemed law firm based in Illinois, we handle personal injury cases including dog bites meticulously with your best interest at heart. Irrespective of where your incident occurred, our commitment is to offer unwavering representation and support because each case is unique and deserves individual attention. Our extensive experience combined with our thorough understanding of Illinois’ laws equips us to relentlessly pursue justice for victims of these traumatizing occurrences. At Carlson Bier, nothing matters more than securing the most favorable outcome for you—medical bills coverage or compensation for trauma endured due to a canine attack; we rally tirelessly on behalf of those who’ve suffered dog bite injuries. Choose us for dedicated representation that holds negligent parties accountable and prioritizes your peace-of-mind throughout this challenging time: Choose Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Riverside Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expert team of dedicated personal injury attorneys is adept at navigating the nuanced landscape of dog bite injuries in Illinois. We understand that suffering a dog bite injury can be a traumatic and life-altering event that goes beyond physical pain and scars, often leaving psychological impacts as well. Our utmost aim is to help you get the justice you deserve while making the legal process as smooth and stress-free as possible for you.

Dog bite cases hinge greatly on understanding Illinois Dog Bite Law. Under Section 16 of the Animal Control Act, a victim has rights to compensation if bitten by another individual’s dog without provocation while conducting themselves peacefully in any place they may lawfully be. That could range from a public park to someone else’s property with explicit permission from owner. Our seasoned team’s deep knowledge of this legislation ensures your case is rudder-steered toward achieving rightful compensation.

· The pivotal factors observed for bringing successful claims constitute; Identifying the correct liable party, Determining whether there was provocation, Establishing your lawful presence in location and Validating compliance with local laws regarding leash or muzzle

We work vigilantly in gathering substantial evidence to affirm these factors favorably in your case which builds a robust path for ensuring just compensation.

In such situations where insurance companies may resist paying benefits or try to miniscule settlement amounts, we use strategic negotiation skills combined with our vast experience to secure maximum recovery. It’s integral also to comprehend that damages exceed medical bills – financial coverage extends into lost wages due-to incapacitation, cost-of future treatment along with the non-economic terms like pain suffering and disfigurement which are unquestionably factored-in.

· Realize: Insurance providers will utilize age-old tactics designed to reduce your fair payout or prod loophole arguments disputing liability…A skilled attorney knows how best countering these advances thereby orchestrating increased chances not only claim success but obtaining full-value settlements.

Furthermore, knowing that dog bite injuries don’t discriminate, we offer a sensitive and comprehensive approach. Whether you’re an adult or child, by ensuring regardless of age their rights to compensation are championed emphatically.

But our commitment doesn’t halt merely at the technicalities… Comprehending how distressing these circumstances can be, we offer empathetic support as well. We not only secure your legal position but take immense pride in providing emotional comfort through uncertain times which ultimately makes profound difference to our clients’ recovery process.

· Key consideration: Filing dog bite claims have a statute limitations, 2 years from date injury occurred is stipulated under Illinois Law for initiating legal proceedings against offending party. This makes prompt action crucial in order to preserve evidence and witness testimonies towards fortifying your case.

At Carlson Bier, we believe each client deserves individual attention with a focus on getting them back onto their pre-injury life path as closely as possible. We’re fully dedicated toward guiding you effectively & compassionately throughout your journey into rightful justice after experiencing such an unfortunate ordeal.

Now that you have vital insights anchoring the intricacies of dog bite injuries under Illinois law along with persuasive reasons why partnering Carlson Bier team would be beneficially robust decision… Why wait any more? It’s time affirm taking control over stressful circumstance by Soliciting Expert-Ease. Go ahead; click on the button below now! Find out exactly what potential compensation could possibly turn your current predicament from tumultuous to solacing empowerment – You deserve nothing less! Bear mind…. it’s absolutely Free consultation asking for “your” rights so there’s Absolutely no obligation tied-in!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Riverside Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Riverside

Areas of Practice in Riverside

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending adept legal services for people of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving problematic products, delivering professional legal help to customers affected by defective items.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Stumble Injuries

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Traumas

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Committed to assisting sufferers of car accidents get reasonable compensation for hurts and damages.

Motorbike Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Incident

Extending specialist legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Worksite Mishaps

Concentrated on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in delivering professional legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and expert legal services to ensure redress.

Spine Harm

Expert in defending individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440