Bicycle Accidents in Riverside

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a bicycle accident can be incredibly challenging, especially in bustling locales such as Riverside. Strategies for recovery extend beyond just physical healing — they often warrant legal support to ensure fair compensation and justice. This is where an eminent presence like Carlson Bier steps into the frame; distinguished Personal Injury Attorneys with specialization in addressing Bicycle Accidents. Our team at Carlson Bier has consistently advocated for bicyclists’ rights, ensuring our clients receive complete recompense for their ordeals. With us, you’ll have decades of extensive litigation experience dedicated to your case, utilizing comprehensive knowledge about intricate cycling regulations prevalent in Illinois regions including Riverside area litigations. We empathize with your situation and aim to deliver exceptional service that puts your comfort first while acting assertively against parties liable for the accidents. Selecting Carlson Bier means choosing assertive representation deep-rooted in expertise and commitment remarkably unparalleled within this complex legal field.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Riverside Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our primary goal is to offer exceptional legal services while protecting rights belonging to victims of bicycle accidents in Illinois. We comprehend that the implications of a bicycle accident can be tremendously painful and life-altering on various fronts – physical trauma, emotional distress, financial strain due to medical bills and more. Armed with extensive legal experience and unwavering commitment, we dedicate ourselves to advocate for your rights so as to recover compensation you rightfully deserve.

Bicycle accidents can occur from various circumstances. They include – but are not limited to- collisions with cars or other vehicles; riding into open car doors (dooring); right/left turn accidents; roadway hazard incidents with pedestrian interferences among others. Each of these instances possess distinct challenges when presenting a case in court which is why it’s imperative that your attorney comprehends these nuances thoroughly. At Carlson Bier, we approach each case diligently by understanding its unique characteristics before devising an effective legal strategy.

Often overlooked yet equally important factors influencing bicycle accidents are the state specific laws and regulations surrounding safe bicycling behavior. In Illinois for instance, cyclists have an equal share on roads as motor vehicles do (as per 625 ILCS 5/11-1502). Such knowledge regarding road rules keeps us abreast of pertinent details thereby allowing us strategic insights while litigating cases related to bike crashes.

Some key takeaways from our advocacy are:

• In-depth investigations: We conduct thorough investigations to identify all liable parties involved.

• Evidence compilation: Gathering strong evidence including photographs of injuries sustained, eyewitness testimonies, police reports & medical records forms basis of our robust case building process.

• Negotiation skills: Being skilled negotiators, we often manage settling most cases outside court thereby avoiding lengthy & expensive trials.

• Trial capabilities: If negotiations fail though, rest assured knowing our formidable trial experience will represent your interests staunchly.

• Victims’ Rights Education: Beyond our legal expertise rests the value we bring through educating victims about their rights post-accidents.

We comprehend that dealing with the aftermath of a bicycle accident isn’t easy. Our philosophy at Carlson Bier is to march___. _in this difficult journey shoulder-to-shoulder with you. We ensure that your voice is heard & interests protected so that justice prevails, and you can focus uninterrupted on rebuilding your life.

Let us spare a moment’s thought here for understanding liability in bike accidents better. The concept of “comparative negligence” very much exists within Illinois law wherein even if cyclists contribute partially to the incident, they may still be entitled to compensation (as per 735 ILCS 5/2-1116). To simplify, let’s say if you are found 20% responsible for crash involvement, yet suffered losses worth $10000; attainment of $8000 as damages post deduction of comparative fault (i.e., 20%) now falls within possibilities.

At Carlson Bier, our services aren’t just limited to representing victims in bicycle accidents – we also passionately represent families who unfortunately lose loved ones due to such catastrophic incidents by filing wrongful death cases against erring parties. The pain resulting from losing a near one can’t really be compensated monetarily; however, our goal will always remain centered around bringing justice to affected families by punishing guilty entities legally whilst securing financial compensation where possible.

Regardless of complexities involved or who the opposing party might be – we stand committed towards handling each case with utmost diligence thereby advocating fervently for clients until justice has been served rightfully!

Whatever misfortunes might have befallen upon you or a cherished family member as result of any unfortunate bicycling accidents – remember! You aren’t alone. Seek rightful assistance today energetically provided personally by dedicated attorneys at Carlson Bier whose sole mission focuses around vesting power back into hands where they rightfully belong – Consumers like YOU!

Click on the button below to get started and find out how much your case is worth! Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier awaits eagerly to engage, empower & eventually lead you towards brighter horizons with dignity & respect that you deserve. Remember justice may be delayed; but when sought fervently, it’s rarely denied – So, go ahead, take your very first step towards redemption today – We are right here alongside supporting you all throughout this journey!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Riverside Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Riverside

Areas of Practice in Riverside

Bike Accidents

Specializing in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving adept legal advice for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering specialist legal support for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering adept legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Slip Occurrences

Professional in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Wounds

Extending legal help for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents get just remuneration for damages and harm.

Bike Incidents

Focused on providing representation for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Truck Incident

Ensuring experienced legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for losses.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Focused on delivering compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Demise

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Impairment

Focused on assisting patients with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer