...

Bicycle Accidents in Rochelle

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a bicycle accident disrupts your life, crucial legal assistance is much-needed. Trust Carlson Bier to navigate this complex path towards justice for you. Renowned as leading personal injury lawyers in Illinois, we specialize in Bicycle Accidents law, with an impressive track record of successfully representing clients affected by such unfortunate incidents. We may not be physically present in Rochelle; however, our extensive understanding of the local legislation and our dedicated commitment enables us to deliver unparalleled service remotely too. Whether it’s negotiating fair settlements or trailblazing through aggressive litigation strategies when required, our team at Carlson Bier can steadfastly advocate on your behalf without compromising integrity or expertise. Pioneers among Bicycle Accident attorneys, we have an unwavering dedication towards securing deserved compensation for physical injury and property damage due to reckless negligence on the roadways involving cyclists. Broaden your scope beyond geographical boundaries -choose Carlson Bier as your staunch ally during these testing times.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Rochelle Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities and legal intricacies surrounding bicycle accidents. As leading personal injury attorneys in Illinois, our primary objective is to provide comprehensive legal counsel and robust defense for victims of such incidents. Bicycle accidents can result in severe injuries or even fatalities, with profound implications for individuals and their families.

In any case involving a bicycle accident, several key factors come into play. These include the initial cause of the accident – be it distracted driving, negligence on part of another party or poor road conditions among others. Additionally, we pay close attention to the extent of the injuries sustained; these could range from physical harm such as fractures and bruises to mental trauma that follows an incident. Another critical aspect is comprehending Illinois’s specific laws regarding cycling safety and rights – something that has become one of Carlson Bier’s areas of specialty.

• Initial cause: Whether you’ve been side-swiped by a motor vehicle that didn’t see you due to distracted driving or fell due to hazardous conditions on the bike path, establishing liability sets precedence for your case.

• Injury assessment: Understanding thoroughly your medical records post-accident becomes crucial in determining a compensation amount that reflects current medical costs as well as future ones linked with ongoing treatment and potential loss of earnings.

• Local cycling laws: Familiarity with local regulation ensures more significant insights into particular rules violated during your mishap which strengthens your claim considerably.

Navigating through legal channels post-accident can be incredibly daunting – It’s not just about battling adversity but also maintaining peace of mind knowing justice will be served swiftly. At Carlson Bier, our team prides itself on offering approachable professional service while advocating forcefully on behalf of clients.

Representing clients from all over Illinois state (excluding Rochelle), we underscore empathy coupled with relentless pursuit towards ensuring those affected receive equitable recompense wherever possible along with other forms restitution including rehabilitation costs or incidental expenses incurred because of the accident.

Our expertise does not only lie in our knowledge but also in our approach to every case. To us, there’s no such thing as “just another bicycle accident”. You can be confident that your concerns will never be downplayed, and your voice will always be heard at Carlson Bier.

Up-to-date familiarity with changes within state laws across Illinois means you are represented by hands seasoned with experience while paying meticulous attention to details which could affect your claim’s outcome substantially.

Whether you’re a victim of a hit-and-run incident or experiencing resistance from insurance companies unwilling to dispense fair compensation – our mission is standing firmly beside you throughout the process, ensuring optimal outcomes reflecting due justice worthy for your situation.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that legal jargon should not be a barrier between clients and their rights. As part of this belief, we strive towards breaking down potential complexities into digestible format allowing you to understand better everything about your case – giving power back into your hands where it rightfully belongs.

Finally, understanding the worth of a personal injury lawsuit may often seem confusing given inherent variables in each unique situation. We exist to simplify these aspects for you– providing clarity on those gray areas concerning possible damages recoverable or qualifications needed within settlement considerations dictated by Illinois law. Simply click on ‘Find Your Case Worth’ below – let Carlson Bier help chart the way forward through this challenging phase meticulously conjuring strategies pragmatic yet robust enough securing peace restored within life’s normal rhythm unhindered by unfortunate cycling accidents.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Rochelle Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Rochelle

Areas of Practice in Rochelle

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Providing professional legal support for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal advice for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending professional legal assistance to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Slip Mishaps

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Infant Wounds

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Car Crashes

Accidents: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents receive equitable payout for damages and impairment.

Bike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Extending expert legal representation for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Engaged in supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to offering expert legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unfair Passing

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Committed to supporting victims with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer