...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Rochelle

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you live in Rochelle and you’re seeking legal counsel for a dog bite injury, look no further than Carlson Bier. Our expertise lies in personal injury cases, with a strong emphasis on dog bite injuries. Over the years, we’ve successfully represented hundreds of clients suffering from such incidents, always prioritizing their needs above all else. The attorneys at Carlson Bier are more than just your lawyers; they strive to alleviate the stress related to legal procedures and paperwork while actively pursuing suitable compensation for your trauma. With thorough investigation skills backed by extensive knowledge of Illinois’ stringent animal control laws, our team provides formidable representation that is crucial when confronting insurance companies or litigation adversaries. At Carlson Bier, we don’t just fight for justice; we work towards creating an environment where citizens can feel safe from preventable accidents like dog bites. For trusted legal guidance following a canine-inflicted injury incident near Rochelle area , think of Chelsea Beir: Your ideal aid in navigating complex paths to rightful remunerations.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Rochelle Illinois

Renowned as trusted advocates within the Illinois legal community, Carlson Bier diligently upholds its sterling reputation by tirelessly pursuing justice for victims of personal injury. Our law firm specializes in a wide array of personal injuries, with emphasis and particular expertise in cases involving Dog Bite Injuries. Drawing on our wealth of knowledge and combined years of experience, we are committed to shedding light on your rightful eligibility for compensation should you fall victim to such avoidable mishaps.

To fully comprehend the extent to which dog bite injuries can affect you or your loved ones, it’s vital to understand the nature and severity these injuries often bear. Ranging second degree bites potentially resulting in minor lacerations and bruises, through outright fatal maulings; an innocent encounter with an unrestrained pet can quickly escalate into a life-altering eventuality.

– Dogs have robust jaw muscles capable of exerting significant pressure when biting.

– Any dog regardless its breed, size, or supposed temperament is capable of inflicting severe damage.

– Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common among dog bite survivors especially where children are concerned.

Effectively navigating the intricate landscape of personal injury law necessitates appropriate professional counsel. Here at Carlson Bier we commit wholeheartedly towards holding guilty parties accountable while aggressively advocating for your recovery; both medical and financial.

Dog bite injuries raise multiple questions on liability issues; whose responsibility is it when a domesticated canine assaults? How do insurance policies tackle such tragedies particularly where minor wounds mature into significant health concerns with time?

Liability predominantly lies on the owner’s shoulder requiring they pay damages if their negligence resulted in an attack occurring due to poor control over their animal.

Insurance coverage regarding dog bites typically falls under homeowners’ or renters’ insurances but varies depending upon specific stipulations outlined by individual policies.

Enlist Carlson Bier’s adept support facilitating navigation through convoluted legal processes accompanied by effective negotiation strategies aiming at deriving maximal results from claims.

– Our law firm evaluates your claim’s details before proceeding into the negotiation phase.

– Ensuring you’re fully informed about your rights and potential recovery avenues is our primary mission.

– Operating strictly on a contingency basis, we don’t get paid unless you do.

Carlson Bier’s unparalleled devotion to each client alongside measurable track records solidifies our stand as foremost legal advisers within Illinois around dog bite injuries. Backed by an adept team of qualified attorneys steeped in experience and rich expertise; rest assured that your interests are safeguarded every step towards securing due compensation for inflicted injuries.

It should be noted emphatically that being mauled or bitten by a pet isn’t merely attributing blame towards their owners but emphasizes utmost importance of keeping all members of society safe. The aftermath of such unfortunate incidents often leaves victims nursing profound medical, emotional, and financial wounds necessitating competent representation fighting for justice to prevail.

You’ve learnt vast amounts surrounding liability issues regarding dog bites, owner responsibility, insurance implications amongst other vital facets relating to personal injury caused by pets. It is time now for decisive action! We invite you to explore how the expert team at Carlson Bier can help amplify the value of your claim while simplifying this challenging journey filled with unexpected twists and turns. All it takes is one click on the button below to ascertain what potentially your case could yield you in due compensation.

Do not wait another moment struggling with confusion or fear over impending financial burdens associated with your affliction. Allow us at Carlson Bier offer you knowledgeable assistance, immediate support alongside tireless pursuit aimed at ensuring maximal restitution for damages suffered. Ignite hope during these trying times; reach out today – let us shoulder weighty legalities while you focus primarily on recuperating swiftly and completely knowing full well we have got penalties duly covered on behalf of negligent parties responsible for causing irreparable harm initially.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Rochelle Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Rochelle

Areas of Practice in Rochelle

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Supplying specialist legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring expert legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, offering professional legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Fall Occurrences

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking redress for their suffering.

Neonatal Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to helping victims of car accidents obtain fair recompense for damages and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending experienced legal support for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for damages.

Construction Collisions

Engaged in defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to ensuring compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Damage

Focused on defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer