FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Rochester

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a dog bite injury, it’s crucial to have experienced legal representation. Carlson Bier specializes in personal injury cases specifically relating to Dog Bite Injuries, and provides exceptional services throughout Rochester. Their extensive knowledge allows them to skillfully navigate complex cases and hold responsible parties accountable. Veterinary bills, plastic surgeries or psychological counselling could be covered if liable parties are proven negligent under Illinois law commonly referred as “One-Bite rule”. Whether you’ve suffered from minor injuries or traumatic ones that necessitate long-term care, their expertise is invaluable when seeking due compensation.

Moreover, trusting Carlson Bier means investing in unmatched dedication and thoroughness; they handle each case meticulously while maintaining communication with clients at their utmost convenience. Navigating through a dog bite case alone can be challenging; let your worries rest by relying on this dedicated group of attorneys deeply committed not only towards securing justice but also offering compassion during these trying times.

Appointing Carlson Bier as your attorney ensures comprehensive guidance through every step of your claim process ensuring peace-of-mind along this critical journey.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Rochester Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride our personal injury attorney team on being experts in a number of specialized fields, with one such specialty being dog bite injuries. Being victim to a dog bite can be a traumatic event, leading to physical and emotional trauma documenting the necessary medical treatment can equate to significant bills. Hence, it becomes important that rightful compensations are received by victims as part of their recovery process.

Let us dive deeper into understanding why you need an expert lawyer if bitten by a dog in Illinois. The state has strict laws pertaining to animal control and human safety. Specifically according to the ‘Animal Control Act’, Illinois operates under ‘strict liability’ when it comes to dog bites – meaning owners are held responsible for an unprovoked attack where the person bitten was conducting themselves peacefully. In such scenarios victims are entitled to compensation for both economic damages (medical bills, loss of earnings) and non-economic damages (pain & suffering). Yet navigating legal complexities while recovering from trauma is not ideal thus employing professional legal assistance is recommended.

The responsibility that rests upon Dog Owners cannot be underestimated either; distinct guidelines suggest they must ensure dogs have all necessary vaccinations and registrations —furthermore the law states dogs should always be supervised or kept confined within owner’s property – failure could result in liability for damages caused by their pet.

In this context then take note of:

– The importance of immediate medical attention post-bite irrespective of its severity

– Gathering evidence from scene of incident including eye witness testimonies

– Keeping record of any subsequent medical procedures/ therapy/counseling necessitated

– Ensuring your Injury is well documented with hospitals or clinics attended.

Most importantly? Do not hesitate in contacting an experienced personal injury attorney like those found at Carlson Bier. Our skilled team will devise strategies through thorough study of case history ensuring rightful pursuit towards full recovery costs let alone working tirelessly on victim’s behalf streamlining complicated claim filing process in most compassionate manner possible. Their extensive knowledge of animal control laws and persistence in fighting for victim’s rights works towards ensuring potentially higher compensation amounts.

Given the unpredictable nature of dog bite injuries, victims can find themselves under financial strain due to mounting medical costs, lost wages from inability to work, along with handling emotional stress of physical discomfort or deformity. Hence having an attorney on your side becomes a necessity rather than a choice. It is at this juncture that the massive wealth of experience and expertise at Carlson Bier truly comes into play.

Our team raises a concrete case by diligently studying each circumstance understanding individual trauma following strategic approaches in claim processes significantly enhancing chances for rightful compensation recovery.

At Carlson Bier we believe our clients should have all relevant information prior deciding next course action after experiencing complex traumatic incidents like dog bites. Therefore we invite you transparent evaluation wherein expert attorneys asses specific cases; laying out potential legal scenario’s courses right up front without hidden charges – our commitment is ‘no fees unless we win.’

It is important to remember that those who’ve suffered such injuries don’t need additional burden instead deserve undeterred focus better health potential improvement life quality overall happiness hence Carlson Bier takes pride playing vital part striving these aims while tackling legal complexities head-on behalf.

Now it’s your turn discover stark difference proactive dedicated service makes—when choosing experienced competent personal injury attorney group very much concerned about you achieving best outcomes- Click button below understand what your case could be worth based upon intricate details around incident may impact final outcome.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rochester Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Rochester

Areas of Practice in Rochester

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or perilous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Giving adept legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Hospital Malpractice

Offering experienced legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal services to customers affected by defective items.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Fall Mishaps

Expert in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents receive reasonable settlement for wounds and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing professional legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for hurts.

Construction Crashes

Focused on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Committed to delivering expert legal support for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at handling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Undeserved Fatality

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in advocating for individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​