...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Rochester

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re searching for an experienced Pedestrian Accident attorney in the Rochester area, consider Carlson Bier. Our seasoned team prides itself on our unparalleled success rate which is a testament to our dedication, and professionalism when dealing with Pedestrian Accident cases. Extensive knowledge of pedestrian laws coupled with years of courtroom experience makes us aptly equipped for handling complex personal injury litigations effectively and efficiently. At Carlson Bier we prioritize client satisfaction; therefore, maintaining open communication channels throughout the process helps clients rest easy knowing they are in capable hands. We fight relentlessly to secure maximum compensation as we understand these tangibles can significantly assuage emotional distress and physical damage caused by such accidents.

With a comprehensive understanding of Illinois law tailored specifically around pedestrians rights and safety regulations, together with keen precision into accident investigations—Carlson Bier distinguishes itself from other firms through meticulous services that endows justice every step of its way.

Note: Irrespective of your location within or beyond Rochester boundaries— if involved in any unfortunate pedestrian-related incident reach out to us at Carlson Bier -we are committed to taking your case head-on until victory becomes yours!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Rochester Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that being involved in a pedestrian accident can be stressful and mentally taxing. We have streamlined the complex process of understanding your rights and seeking legal representation so you don’t have to navigate these murky waters alone.

Pedestrian accidents often involve substantial damages due to the devastating impact caused by motor vehicles. The injured party may potentially face extensive physical therapy, demanding medical bills, lost wages due to inability to work, and emotional distress likewise. At our firm, our goal is not only to recuperate financial losses but also ensure you get comprehensive rehabilitation and medical care.

Understanding common causes of pedestrian accidents can greatly assist in establishing liability. These incidents occur because of various reasons including but not limited to distracted driving (like texting or talking on the phone), speeding, failure to yield at crosswalks, impaired driving due to drugs or alcohol and ignoring traffic signs or signals. Importantly though, it’s worth noting that every case is unique hence a detailed investigation encompassing witness statements and examining available evidence such as surveillance footage plays an integral part.

Regarding Illinois law specifically:

• Pedestrians usually have the right-of-way at all controlled intersections.

• Drivers are obligated to stop for pedestrians in a crosswalk even if there’s no marked crosswalk.

• Drivers must stop when approaching any vehicle which has stopped at a marked or unmarked crosswalk.

With Carlson Bier on your side, rest assured we will thoroughly scrutinize each aspect of your case leveraging our resources and wealth of experience drawn from numerous similar cases handled over years.

Eligibility for compensation following pedestrian-related accidents tends largely on proving who was at fault; this forms one of our core competencies—establishing culpability based on evidence gathered while ensuring full adherence with Illinois’s statutes regulatory framework around personal injury claims.

Compensation claims could incorporate permanent disability or disfigurement, pain and suffering, loss of normal life activities among other essentials like the conspicuous medical bills from hospital stays, surgeries, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. Also compensable are diminished earning capacity for future earnings in cases where victims can’t go back to work owing to their injuries.

Importantly too, not every claim may end up in a full-fledged court case; some get settled pre-trial thanks to effective negotiations which yield satisfactory outcomes tantamount to what a court award after trial could reasonably confer. However, when there’s need to litigate challenging or complex claims that can’t get resolved via mutual concessions—you can depend on Carlson Bier’s capable team of aggressive courtroom advocates who fight tirelessly on your behalf until justice is served.

It’s perfectly fine if you have little knowledge about laws around pedestrian accidents since our experts are ever ready to step into your shoes providing unrivaled guidance through this intricate maze while ensuring all relevant procedures get observed within stipulated timelines so as not to jeopardize your rightful benefits under Illinois law.

Relentless dedication towards securing maximum compensation possible for our clients forms part of our operational credo at Carlson Bier. Meaning you’re more than just a case number—your well-being matters deeply! From handling initial consultations free-of-charge, working on contingency basis (we only get paid when we secure compensation for you) right through concerted endeavors aimed at alleviating stress arising out mitigating subsequent complications due injuries sustained during the unfortunate accident—you’re guaranteed absolute peace of mind.

If you or someone close has unfortunately been involved in a pedestrian accident and considering legal representation—look no further. Having interacted with countless people previously in seemingly shaky circumstances similar yours but helped them successfully pursue deserved compensation now living lives filled less worry much better control over their future—we assure you we won’t relent until the very end!

For absolutely obligation-free assessment plus detailed insights into how much your case potentially worth—click on the button below without second thought.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rochester Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Rochester

Areas of Practice in Rochester

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending expert legal advice for patients of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Offering experienced legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal help to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Tumble Mishaps

Specialist in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Harms

Delivering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents secure reasonable payout for hurts and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

18-Wheeler Crash

Ensuring adept legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Committed to delivering professional legal services for clients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for people who have suffered damages from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Undeserved Demise

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure redress.

Vertebral Impairment

Specializing in advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​