Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Rosiclare

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Accidents unfortunately do happen, and when they involve pedestrians, the injuries can be devastating. Enter Carlson Bier, your leading choice for professional pedestrian accident legal representation in Illinois state. Exemplary in their dedication to justice and client care, the expert team at Carlson Bier comprehensively understands how traumatic these kinds of accidents can be on both victims and their families. They harness their vast knowledge and experience to navigate through complex legal procedures. One reason to consider them is that they work persistently not only on asserting responsibility but also obtaining clear proof supporting each case – an element vital creditably connecting one’s injury with the incident that occurred. Their strategic approach leaves no stone unturned ensuring all rightful compensation is recovered ranging from hospital bills to lost income. Moreover, their free initial consultation offers potential clients a risk-free opportunity for discussion about what has happened without feeling rushed or pressured into making any decisions prematurely.

In choosing Carlson Bier as your representative in pedestrian accidents law matters; you are entrusting a competent partner who’ll fight tirelessly towards gaining you fair judgment while treating you as more than just another case number.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Rosiclare Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves in providing unparalleled legal expertise for all personal injury cases. Across Illinois, we are renowned as dedicated and resolute advocates for those seeking justice from pedestrian accidents. We believe that understanding the details of a pedestrian accident can be crucial in asserting your rights and obtaining fair compensation.

Pedestrian accidents occur when drivers fail to yield to people on foot within roadways or crosswalks, resulting often in debilitating injuries or fatalities. These incidents cover various situations – from hit and runs to collisions at traffic signals or intersections. No matter the circumstances, if you have experienced a pedestrian accident, our expert attorneys at Carlson Bier can guide you through pursuing appropriate action against liable parties with sheer vigor and commitment.

However, it is critical to understand key elements involved in such cases:

• Duty of care: Legally speaking every driver bears the responsibility, also known as ‘duty of care,’ towards pedestrians. This implies following traffic rules diligently such as speed limits, yielding right-of-way at crosswalks etc.

• Causation: If an accident occurs due to a breach of these duties (e.g., careless driving), proving causation becomes central to establishing negligence.

• Wrongful death claims: In instances where pedestrian accidents result directly into death; loved ones may lay wrongful death claims.

• Compensatory damages: Victims bear rights to financial compensations for losses including medical costs, loss of wages and even mental trauma.

Despite these concrete legal tenets surrounding these mishaps, each case presents unique factors requiring nuanced considerations. Cases can become more complex when numerous parties are involved or there’s disagreement over fault attribution or assessments over severity of injuries manifesting later on. The importance therefore lies in prompt action by consulting professional legal advice immediately after an incident; hence ensuring accurate documentation and gathering essential evidence on time.

Our team at Carlson Bier harbors many years offering services culminating superior results for clients. Be it negotiating with obstinate insurance companies to ensure maximum compensation or stepping into a courtroom to battle on your behalf; we remain unyieldingly devoted to our role as your trusted legal ally.

Driving home this import, contrary to many presumptions, hiring a personal injury lawyer doesn’t necessarily translate into hefty fees neither does it imply you’re incapable of handling matters independently. Our team operates on contingency basis- meaning no costly out-of-pocket expenses need burden you. Your focus rests on recuperation while ours is winning the right settlement for you.

In essence, pedestrian accidents can be truly life-altering events plunging victims and their families into turmoil. At Carlson Bier, we stand genuinely inspired by our client’s resilience and move forward arduously in seeking the justice deserved. Trust us, since compassion coupled with relentless advocacy forms our modus operandi; Client satisfaction remains not just an aspiration but a non-negotiable commitment at Carlson Bier.

Furthermore, allow us highlight that misinterpretations often arise associating lawyers advertised ‘location’ against where they physically operate from; however rest assured that your local laws are upheld here staunchly- clearly stating that advertising practice locations necessitates a physical office therein under Illinois law.

In conclusion let us assure you once more; At Carlson Bier – We bring the weight of legal knowledge married with ethical practices ensuring legitimate proceedings each time- every time! Evaluating exact worth of cases differs based on individual specifics hence mustn’t be underestimated.

To best discern how much your case could potentially yield press the button below. Allow us assess professionally- Let Carlson Bier showcase what we do best: advocating fiercely yet thoughtfully for you when needed most. Navigate these unfortunate pedestrial accident aftermaths empowered and enlightened backed by not just any representation – But one reflecting confidence in uncompromised service quality awaiting eagerly at Carlson Bier!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rosiclare Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Rosiclare

Areas of Practice in Rosiclare

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing skilled legal services for patients of major burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Offering experienced legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Accountability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, offering skilled legal support to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Misconduct

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Slip Incidents

Specialist in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents gain just recompense for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in providing representation for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Mishap

Offering expert legal services for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Dedicated to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Brain Injuries

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal advice for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at handling cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer