...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Rushville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from Dog Bite Injuries can be a devastating experience. With the increasing prevalence of such cases in Rushville, it’s crucial to seek expert legal representation to ensure your rights are protected and desirable outcomes achieved. Your best choice is Carlson Bier, a reputable personal injury law firm that specializes in handling dog bite injuries. Our team excels at investigating these intricate scenarios meticulously while working tirelessly for their clients’ benefit. The core vision guiding our work approach is servicing your need for justice by understanding each unique case intimately and leveraging our extensive skillset effectively towards this end. We implement strategic tactics optimized to secure maximum settlement compensation encompassed within Illinois Law guidelines efficiently adhering strictly to ethical standards all through the process ensuring seamless service delivery devoid of hindrances or setbacks thus maximizing favorable solution potentiality Braided with professionalism and expertise Carlson Bier brings peace amidst turbulent times Safeguard yourself against future uncertainties; Allow us handle everything while you concentrate on recovery Choose Carlson Bier Justice delivered

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Rushville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the physical and emotional trauma that can be caused by a dog bite incident. Personal injury law is vast, but cases revolving around dog bites demand a particular kind of attention. Dog bite injuries can range from minor to severe, including life-altering damages such as scarring, disfigurement, nerve damage or even psychological trauma. Our team of experienced personal injury attorneys brings comprehensive understanding and resources to assist you when dealing with these types of accidents.

Dog owners in Illinois are held to rigorous laws regarding pet behavior and can be held liable for any injuries inflicted upon a person by their animal companion. The Pet Control Act dictates that if a dog or other animal attacks another person without provocation while they are on public property or legally on private property, then the owner is responsible for all civil damages towards the individual who was harmed.

However, navigating through these legal proceedings requires extensive knowledge and experience – something Carlson Bier has mastered over the years. Following points delineate some of our key services:

• Thorough case analysis

• Identifying liable parties

• Gathering substantial evidence

• Verifying claim validity

• Ensuring medical assessment coordination

When we represent you in your personal injury lawsuit concerning a dog bite, our priority is securing fair compensation for your pain, suffering and expenses related to medical treatment, psychology counseling fees (for post-traumatic stress), lost wages due to recovery times away from work among others.

Knowledge empowers! This statement stays true especially when dealing with matters involving personal injury law. Understanding more about your rights and knowing the kind of support available could significantly boost your confidence during difficult times like these. To help further this cause our firm invests heavily in educating our clients about laws related their case:

• Strict Liability – Illinois abides by strict liability rules where the victim doesn’t need to prove negligence or intent; simply proving that an attack occurred may suffice.

• No ‘One Bite’ Rule – Unlike some states, Illinois law does not give a dog one ‘free bite’. Owners are liable for any injury their pet causes from the first incident.

• Statute of Limitations – In Illinois, you have two years to file a personal injury lawsuit.

• Caps on Damages – There’s no cap on damages in personal injury cases by animals except punitive damages which must be demonstrated with clear and convincing evidence.

Rest assured that at Carlson Bier, our astute lawyers would work tirelessly to recover maximum compensation while delivering personalized service tailored to your individual needs. Our experience dealing with insurance companies ensures we take an aggressive stance in protecting our clients’ best interests. Our mission is simple: To serve justice by giving those affected by unforeseen circumstances access to top-notch legal aid.

Our distinguished services come seconded with unmatched transparency where clients pay absolutely nothing unless there’s success in their case! We believe in working towards securing not just rightful compensation but restoring peace of mind too. We envision providing a platform where everyone affected by such injuries gets fair representation & are able to begin their healing journey unhindered.

If you or someone you know has been adversely affected due to a canine attack, it is crucial you connect with an accomplished attorney from Carlson Bier without delay. Don’t let this distressing encounter add undue burdens into your life; allow us to shoulder these daunting legal responsibilities instead so that you can focus on recovery.

Act now and click below! Discover how much your case could potentially be valued at. Find out how our dedicated team of attorneys can help navigate you through this complex process and turn this unfortunate event into a path towards lawful recompense and swift healing. Your journey towards justice starts here at Carlson Bier, dependable advocates for victims of dog bite incidents across Illinois.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Rushville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Rushville

Areas of Practice in Rushville

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering expert legal support for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Physician Incompetence

Extending experienced legal services for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, delivering skilled legal help to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Misconduct

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal support for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Mishaps

Collisions: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents obtain just remuneration for harms and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Crash

Providing specialist legal advice for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Dedicated to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Focused on providing specialized legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and experienced legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Committed to representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​