FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Saint Elmo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Medical malpractice is a serious matter that requires expertise and competence only obtained through rigorous experience in the field. That’s why Carlson Bier has established itself as a trusted ally when you’re faced with such situations. With their unparalleled understanding of Illinois law, they stand ready to advocate on behalf of patients wronged by medical negligence or oversight. Their strategic approach, steeped in years of legal practice, ensures your needs are heard and adequately met while navigating the complexities that Medical Malpractice entails. They champion patient rights fearlessly while upholding ethical standards and fostering transparency – making them an essential partner in your quest for justice. If you are seeking representation marked by integrity and dedicated client service with proven results then Carlson Bier is without doubt your exemplary choice for Medical Malpractice issues within Saint Elmo area residents’ reach! The emphasis here isn’t on geographical location but ability – Ability to serve you better relentlessly wherever you are across the state – every resident deserves expert legal guidance like what Carlson Bier offers.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Saint Elmo Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of dedicated personal injury lawyers operating within the state of Illinois. Our legal prowess extends deeply into various realms of personal injury law, with special consideration given to cases pertaining to medical malpractice. It is our philosophy to provide information and value before you even walk through our door. Thus, we take this opportunity to present some crucial details about Medical Malpractice under Illinois State Law.

When delicate health matters come into question, trust is placed in healthcare professionals. However, when that trust is violated by negligence leading to serious harm or complications, it becomes an issue of medical malpractice. In essence, medical malpractice refers to instances where patients sustain injuries as a result of substandard treatment from healthcare providers.

• Care below Standard: Medical practitioners adhere to certain accepted standards while providing care services. If there’s proven deviation from these set norms causing harm to patients, it qualifies as medical malpractice.

• Significant Damage caused owing to Negligence: Not every case can be tagged as malpractice just because a patient didn’t receive desired results or minor mistakes occured during treatment. For it to be considered for legal discourse under medical malpractice law in Illinois – substantial damage resulting in debilitating disability or enduring suffering must be evident due inhibition predictive guideposts.

To safeguard your rights and understand if you have legitimate grounds for claiming compensation under medical malpractice law in Illinois – professional aid is essential. At Carlson Bier, each attorney possesses years of experience actively managing an exhaustive range of personal injury cases – especially those entailing grievances related with medical recklessness. We deem it imperative not only represent clients but equip them with relevant knowledge concerning their plight making more informed decisions throughout the process.

As noted earlier, your circumstance necessitates proof highlighting egregious error on part designated caregiver ultimately leading significant damages incurred thereof. To this end – acquiring viable corroborating statements from dependable independent experts plays critical role fortifying argument court deliberations ahead.

Evidence collection isn’t the sole criteria, though. Statute of Limitations is another critical issue many often overlook. Ideally, according to Illinois law, from the time the malpractice incident occurs or when you first become aware of it with reasonable discovery – an individual has exactly two years to file a case in court. However, no claim can be made if four years have passed since the date of the actual malpractice event -regardless of when you discovered it.

Carlson Bier works meticulously right from compiling supportive evidences till representing clientele r decision on their dispute. Our purpose is not merely ensuring recovery compensation due but creating awareness about matters personal injury medicine negligence alike among citizens facilitating faster smoother resolutions future standoffs similar nature too.

Navigating complexities Medical Malpractice Illinois demands clear understanding its nuances adept maneuvering through myriad laws associated therein – attributes Carlson Bier attorneys unmatched expertise.

By clicking on ‘Find out how much your case could be worth below’, you’re deciding take proactive vector toward possible redressal impending legal crossroads confront. Embarking journey seeking justice fair compensation against negligent healthcare providers probably most significant proactive steps likely undertake lifetime thus deserves apt sincere professional support ensure triumph end game awaiting.

Ensure victory side assert rights adeptly utilizing rich experience couched absolute commitment against allied challenges- Place trust Carlson Bier today let expert team guide towards rightful deserved vindication tomorrow!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Elmo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Saint Elmo

Areas of Practice in Saint Elmo

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering professional legal services for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Negligence

Providing expert legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal guidance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Focused on helping clients of car accidents secure fair compensation for wounds and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Crash

Extending experienced legal advice for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just claims for injuries.

Building Site Accidents

Engaged in representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Injuries

Committed to providing expert legal support for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unjust Demise

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Trauma

Focused on representing patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​