...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Saint Francisville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with a dog bite injury in Saint Francisville, finding an experienced attorney is crucial. Your choice should be the distinguished Carlson Bier law firm. Their team of dedicated attorneys specializes solely in personal injury cases such as Dog Bite Injuries, ensuring you receive focused expertise in your time of need. Understanding Illinois’ specific statutes and regulations regarding animal-induced injuries can make all the difference when seeking compensation for medical expenses or emotional trauma. This is where Carlson Bier truly shines; they are versed in maneuvering through this complex legal terrain to secure justice for their clients effectively and promptly. With their deep-rooted commitment to compassion for the injured party, they prioritize client needs above everything else – treating each case with utmost sensitivity and discretion, while working tirelessly towards achieving maximum settlements possible under state laws relating to Dog Bite Injuries. Partnering with Carlson Bier guarantees not just professional legal services but also unyielding advocacy on your behalf throughout your case resolution process making them an unmatched consideration.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Saint Francisville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we have shaped our personal injury law practice around the steadfast commitment to supporting victims of various accidents across Illinois. We specialize in a multitude of personal injury cases, with specific expertise in Dog Bite Injuries – an area where most individuals are unaware of their legal rights and options.

Dog bites can lead not only to physical harm, but also evoke emotional distress for victims. When you or a loved one suffers from such an unfortunate incident, it’s imperative to comprehend some key information about dog bite injuries:

• The owner is usually held liable if their dog bites someone.

• Immediate medical attention is critical after suffering a dog bite.

• Key evidence needed includes photographs of wounds and eyewitness accounts.

Both adults and children have a natural affinity towards dogs making them highly susceptible to dog attacks. As per studies conducted by animal behavior experts, there are several reasons why dogs bite:

• Fear or anxiety: Dogs may lash out if they feel threatened even if no actual threat exists.

• Natural instincts: Some breeds are naturally more aggressive due to breeding practices geared towards cultivating instigating behavior.

• Health issues: Changes in appetite or increased aggression might signal that the pet is experiencing pain discomfort prompting uncontrollable reactions like biting.

Our team at Carlson Bier steps in at such troubling times offering total assistance taking your case forward – compiling substantial evidence that supports your claim alongside testimonials from qualified animal behavior experts attesting proven causes behind the attack leading us diligently through the intricate legal process on your behalf.

Furthermore, understanding how Illinois laws govern matters related to this type of case is vital. The Illinois Animal Control Act states that owners are responsible for canine actions. Hence defendants cannot plead ignorance regarding their pet’s violent predisposition as defense implying we don’t just rely on basic interpretation of the legislation while presenting your case; rather comprehensively exploring every possible avenue ensuring you receive fair compensation.

Undoubtedly these incidents can leave enduring trauma beyond visible scars serving as grim reminders of the event. The impact of a dog bite often has far-reaching financial, emotional and psychological implications. As your legal representatives, we understand this burden.

Our law group dedicates ourselves towards addressing all aspects ensuring optimal recovery:

• Obtaining reimbursements for medical bills.

• Compensation for counseling bills to alleviate trauma symptoms.

• Lodging claim amounts taking into account possible future surgeries or ongoing treatment costs.

We handle every minor detail so you can focus entirely on your healing process guided by our exceptional experience and knowledge providing the best representation available in Illinois.

At Carlson Bier, our clients are always at the helm of our services backed with an assurance that they’ll benefit from effective, practical and expedient handling of their case coupled with enduring professional relationships. By selecting us as your trusted personal injury attorneys, you’re not just enlisting skilled legal experts but entering a partnership characterized by dedication, integrity, and respect.

Interested in learning what your dog bite case could be worth? Don’t hesitate any longer. Use the button below to receive further advice absolutely no cost without obligation – hence allowing us to review every aspect of your situation determining how much you may potentially recover successfully turning adversity into hope swiftly making Carlson Bier synonymous to resilience through justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Francisville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Saint Francisville

Areas of Practice in Saint Francisville

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Supplying adept legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing dedicated legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, offering professional legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Slip Mishaps

Professional in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Accidents: Focused on supporting victims of car accidents secure just compensation for hurts and losses.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Truck Collision

Extending adept legal services for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for damages.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Head Impairments

Committed to offering dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in addressing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Committed to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and skilled legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on advocating for victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​