...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Savanna

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you, or someone you know in Savanna, experienced trauma from a dog bite injury? Carlson Bier is the trusted advocate when it comes to reduction of ensuing stress and securing fair medico-legal judgment. Illinois law defines a strict liability on owners for dog-related injuries; we understand every detail of this legislative landscape and efficiently navigate it on behalf of our clients. We take full accountability, providing personalized attention as well as representing your interests with rigor and expertise. Why choose Carlson Bier? With an impressive track record for obtaining substantial recoveries for victims suffering from dog bite injuries due to others’ negligence has distinguished us amongst our peers. At any given time following the unfortunate incident, we are at the ready to initiate action towards securing compensation that covers medical bills, loss of earnings during recovery period or longer term occupational disruption along with addressing emotional distress related complications leading towards some semblance of normality once again.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Savanna Illinois

At the law firm of Carlson Bier, we specialize in litigating personal injury cases and making certain that justice is served to those harmed due to another’s negligence. A prominent area within our practice is representing individuals who have been victimized by dog bites.

The aftermath of a dog bite can be traumatizing and life-altering. Reports show an annual increase in dog-bite related incidents which often result in serious injuries with long-term physical and emotional trauma. Dog owners are responsible for their pets’ actions, so if you or someone close to you has fallen prey to such a severity, our proficient legal team could help gain rightful compensation for your ordeal.

In Illinois, liability laws unequivocally affirm that pet owners must compensate any individual whom their dog has bitten unprovoked and while on public property or lawfully on private property. This means victims do not need to prove the animal was viciously predisposed or that the owner negligently failed to restrain it adequately.

Key elements encapsulated within such lawsuits typically include:

– The nature of the incident: It’s paramount whether the attack resulted from negligent control leading to an unprovoked assault.

– Location of occurrence: If this happened when a victim was legally present in a private area or openly on public property.

– Severity of injury: Medical documentation validating severity assists in substantiating claims of standstill pain, lacerations, disfigurement, possible infections as well as psychological harm inflicted.

At Carlson Bier, we understand each case possesses unique circumstances; hence our experienced attorneys personalize their approach according to these peculiarities. We meticulously analyze medical records, compile evidence and identify all potential resources viable towards leveraging your compensation claim.

It may be daunting trying to negotiate and navigate through insurance company bureaucracy following such damaging experiences. Insurers regularly attempt reducing compensatory payouts economically – expecting victims will hasten closing claims quickly rather than justly despite having endured severe distress post-harmful experiences. Our knowledgeable staff’s expertise facilitates in countersigning these sophisticated tactics thus ensuring rightful recovery within the most optimum duration.

We manage everything, so you can concentrate on making a full recovery while we pursue justice on your behalf. From initial paperwork to final negotiation or even proceeding toward court cases if that stands necessary – our aim remains achieving the rightful compensation warranted by your sufferings caused due to such devastating circumstances.

Remember, dog bite incidents aren’t merely physical injuries; it’s an infringement of one’s sense of security and well-being which unquestionably merits fair compensation for not just medical expenses but psychological trauma too. Employing reputable representation like Carlson Bier ensures receiving due benefits from all applicable sources thereby facilitating better restoration towards pre-incident health conditions emotionally as well as physically.

With our extensive experience representing victims of personal injury cases in Illinois, rest assured Carlson Bier has the resources and dedication needed to protect your rights and is persistently committed to securing the maximum possible settlement or trial award.

Don’t let an unfortunate incident relinquish you into hardship; employ proficient legal guidance who’re devotedly available side by side supporting throughout this challenging episode aiding in rebuilding life post-trauma. The degree of your dog bite injury might shave off more than just physical layers; don’t fetter yourself with additional financial burden when aid is readily accessible for asserting your deserved recompense!

Here at Carlson Bier, advocating for dog bite victims isn’t merely profession – it’s a mission driven by compassion understanding each client deserves absolute respect along with staunch representation! It isn’t too soon to seek steadfast assistance striving converting catastrophe into triumph getting back control over your life…

So why not take that decisive move? Put action behind those thoughts searching for opportune solicitation. Click the button below now – explore out how much your case is worth and embark onto restoring normalcy benefitting from expert solicitors standing firm guarding best interests during uncertain times… At Carlson Bier, we are committed to making sure you receive full justice. You owe it to yourself!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Savanna Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Savanna

Areas of Practice in Savanna

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Supplying professional legal assistance for individuals of major burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Hospital Misconduct

Providing expert legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Obligation

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing specialist legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Tumble Occurrences

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking justice for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on guiding sufferers of car accidents get reasonable payout for harms and harm.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Semi Collision

Offering experienced legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for harms.

Worksite Accidents

Engaged in defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Expert in offering specialized legal advice for clients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and skilled legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Dedicated to representing victims with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer