FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Savoy

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve been the victim of a dog bite injury in Savoy, securing legal representation from highly skilled attorneys immediately can exponentially increase your chances for recompense. Trusting Carlson Bier accomplishes exactly that. Our firm has a formidable reputation in Illinois, having built an illuminating career around personal injury cases specifically focusing on dog bite injuries. We bring refined expertise and comprehensive legal knowledge to each case enhancing our client’s chance at success substantially. At Carlson Bier, we strive to provide superior direction and empathetic counsel prioritizing our client’s needs conscientiously throughout every step of their legal journey towards justice and rightful compensation. Thanks to years of cultivating effective strategies centered around this specific type of personal injury lawsuit, we bolster the potential for fruitful outcomes tenfold by ensuring every detail is meticulously addressed with unwavering dedication and professionalism. Choosing Carlson Bier as your representative means choosing relentless pursuit for genuine justice against harmful canine encounters in Illinois – because understanding matters just as much as solutions do when dealing with Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Savoy Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that experiencing a dog bite injury can be traumatic and life-altering. As a seasoned personal injury attorney group in Illinois, our dedicated team is committed to helping victims navigate the complex legal landscape associated with dog bite injuries. Our ultimate goal is to ensure you obtain compensation commensurate with your physical pain and emotional suffering.

The complexity of dog bite cases emerges from an array circumstances encompassing both state laws and local ordinances. Illinois law takes a strict liability approach towards dog bites; meaning the owner is generally held liable if their pet causes harm – regardless of whether they were aware of its propensity for aggression. However, local government statutes may also influence the outcome of these cases, therein lies their intricacy.

• Strict Liability: Under this law, even if the owner was not aware or could not predict the dog’s violent behavior, he/she remains accountable for any injuries caused by their pet.

• Local ordinance: Cities or municipalities often have defined rules regarding pet ownership. Their imposition or lack thereof contribute significantly in such litigations.

Understanding who might be legally responsible necessitates deciphering these tangled guidelines which can seem daunting without proficient legal assistance. That is where we at Carlson Bier come into play! Precision characterizes our approach as we comb through every possible detail involved in your case to provide fair representation.

There are several facets to consider when filing a claim for a dog bite injury such as:

• Medical expenses incurred: records proving treatment costs for physical wounds resulting from the incident.

• Loss of earnings/wages: documentation showing missed work due to recovery time off instigated by the incident.

• Post-traumatic Symptoms: medical reports elucidating mental stress disorders spawned out of this unfortunate event.

Our lawyers pledge meticulous examination of all these components in order to prepare solid evidence supporting your claim while concurrently working on expeditious settlement negotiations on your behalfs

Moreover, one must remember that each personal injury case is unique, including those resulting from dog bites. Details such as whether the incident occurred on public or private property and if any form of negligence was at play can significantly affect the outcome of a lawsuit. At Carlson Bier, we understand these difficulties and stand ready to advise you based on our extensive experience in Illinois law.

Emotional turmoil following a dog bite injury should not be exacerbated by legal burdens – notwithstanding confusion attached to unrelenting medical bills or wage losses due to recovery period. The attorneys at Carlson Bier are well versed with intricacies involving scenarios like these and guarantee comprehensive support aligning your specific needs. Whether it involves arranging for resources when cases proceed to trial or negotiating settlement figures, let us represent you – enabling focussed yet swift healing that you rightfully deserve!

Though no amount of compensation could erase the traumatic encounter experienced through such an ordeal, securing monetary relief can ease financial burdens rendered – ensuring concentration solely towards healing and recovery. Allow our seasoned experts at Carlson Bier assist you in navigating this strenuous journey; we pledge proficient handling of your claim providing assurance during these trying times.

In conclusion, there’s really only one way to find out how much your potential claim could be worth: simply click the button below! Bear comfort in knowing that upon contact, every consultation initiates with utmost discretion while evaluating your case details leaving no stone unturned—Because at Carlson Bier, we believe in justice served complete!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Savoy Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Savoy

Areas of Practice in Savoy

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending expert legal advice for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Offering professional legal representation for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving problematic products, extending specialist legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Fall Occurrences

Professional in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking redress for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Supplying legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents obtain reasonable payout for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Collision

Extending professional legal services for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for losses.

Building Crashes

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Head Harms

Committed to offering specialized legal representation for individuals suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Injury

Expert in assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440