FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Shipman

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Medical Malpractice claims require the expert guidance of seasoned professionals, and Carlson Bier is a name etched with trust, expertise, and rigorous dedication to client victories. The firm’s distinguished team of personal injury lawyers specializes in medical malpractice cases, and has successfully represented numerous clients throughout Shipman. Committed to pervasive excellence, Carlson Bier prides itself on its single-minded dedication towards safeguarding their clients’ rights against negligent medical treatment. As adept negotiators with unparalleled strategic acumen for litigation processes if required – they ensure unmatched representation while easing your way through perplexing law intricacies. More than just an administrative process for them; battling Medical Malpractice is about recalibrating justice delivery systems one case at a time. Their experienced eyes spot overlooked details constructing foolproof defense strategies securing successful outcomes consistently not just in Illinois but broadly handling Shipman-targeted clientele too – this makes them perfect allies during challenging legal seascape navigations that come along Medical Malpractice incidents’ aftermaths. Trust Carlson Bier: skillful jurists championing justice delivery within Medical Malpractices Legal battlefields!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Shipman Illinois

Situated in the heart of Illinois is Carlson Bier, an esteemed Personal Injury Attorney Group committed to fighting for those who have fallen victim to medical malpractice situations. We understand that placing trust into your healthcare service providers is vital; hence when this confidence is betrayed or violated, we aim to attain justice ruthlessly.

Medical negligence can oftentimes result in serious harm or even be life-threatening. This discrepancy forms through a professional’s failure to deliver quality and competent care expected within their sector. More concisely, if you’ve been harmed due to negligent actions such as misdiagnosis, surgical errors, medication mistakes among others, you might just have found yourself entwined within a medical malpractice scenario.

• Misdiagnosis: Any delay in diagnosis or incorrect analysis may lead to improper treatment which has detrimental impacts on the patient’s health.

• Surgical Errors: These occur when a surgeon commits needless mistakes during surgery like causing damage to an organ, nerve or tissue inadvertently.

• Medication Mistakes: Incorrect prescription dosages or wrong medications entirely could cause considerable harm.

• Birth Injuries: Negligence during childbirth often results in devastating injuries affecting both mother and child and will represent ground for litigation.

At Carlson Bier, our reputable attorneys possess extensive knowledge and expertise spanning decades that optimally equip us for dealing with cases related to medical malpractices. You are not alone when standing up against big corporations as we fight tirelessly by your side championing your right for adequate compensation.

Making a claim begins with provision of basic details about what happened which aids defining whether it qualifies as medical negligence under the jurisdiction of Illinois law. Remember that every detail counts – the nature of injury sustained should coincide perfectly with the provider’s fault.

Strategizing is crucial while pursuing these issues legally due its unique complexities compared to other personal injury lawsuits. Our established attorney group approaches each case distinctly wherein thorough investigation procedures help formulating strategies custom-made targeting the case’s particular circumstances.

• Fact Gathering: Our investigation process places heavy emphasis on understanding case peculiarities by analyzing medical records, hospital billings, communication with healthcare providers and interviews with potential witnesses.

• Expert Opinion: Collaborating with medical experts constitutes an essential part of our strategic approach. Their insights are priceless while pointing out where things went wrong.

• Legal Perspective: We guide clients through murky litigation waters ensuring that every claim made is compliant to specific Illinois laws surrounding medical malpractice issues.

Carlson Bier prides itself in upholding client relationships on utmost transparency grounds. Therefore, we keep you informed throughout each step involved in fighting for your rightful compensation making sure your voice is heard and rights protected under the law. Additionally, there’s no upfront fee! One pays only if we win – this complements our continuous pursuit for results since your success translates to ours as well.

It’s time to seek redress following the pain endured due to medical negligence and together we can make it happen. You deserve justice served rightfully and properly so don’t endure silent suffering! Remember every second counts when putting a claim forward as limitations exist about validity periods which could lead to missed opportunities for justified recompense consequently lost forever!

Simply click on the button below for a free evaluation where our dedicated attorneys will determine what your case might be worth through comprehensive scrutiny of all related aspects involved within less than 24 hours upon submission. This forms your first tremendous step towards winning back what was unfairly taken from you – let Carlson Bier stand by you championing better times ahead! Contact us now because justice delayed is justice denied!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Shipman Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Shipman

Areas of Practice in Shipman

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Extending expert legal support for patients of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Offering dedicated legal advice for victims affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal guidance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Stumble Mishaps

Professional in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Crashes: Committed to guiding individuals of car accidents get reasonable compensation for wounds and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Focused on providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Truck Mishap

Extending professional legal advice for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Worksite Crashes

Concentrated on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Expert in extending specialized legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal services to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Impairment

Dedicated to assisting persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​