...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Burn Injuries in Smithton

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a burn injury can be traumatic and unsettling, but you don’t need to face the aftermath alone. Carlson Bier are dedicated attorneys specializing in this field of personal injury law who diligently advocate for clients in and around Smithton. This exceptional legal team works steadfastly, employing their decades of experience to assist those experiencing severe burn injuries as the result of someone else’s negligence. They focus not only on your present condition but projected future losses through medical expenses or lost income as well. With meticulous attention to detail, they navigate through the intricacies of insurance companies ensuring victims receive rightful compensation for tangible and intangible damages alike – loss tolerance or emotional distress included. When seeking justice due to catastrophic burns from fire accidents or faulty consumer products among others; you deserve an attorney who understands these complex cases thoroughly – that’s where Carlson Bier comes into play; caring professionals committed to fighting tenaciously by your side until meaningful resolution is achieved! Choose them for steadfast representation tailored distinctly towards burn injuries claims.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Smithton Illinois

Carlson Bier, a premier personal injury law firm, is committed to offering comprehensive legal support for burn injury cases across Illinois. With an unrivaled core of experienced attorneys, we provide remarkable representation with compassion and determination in seeking justice for our clients.

Burn injuries are inherently complex requiring the precision of accurate facts. Regardless of the type or degree of burn injury sustained — be it first-degree burns which affect only the outer layer of skin; second-degree burns that reach deeper layers; third-degree burns impacting deeper tissues; or fourth-degree burns destroying muscle or bone structure — at Carlson Bier, we assist you every step of the way.

Experience has shown us that these traumatic injuries often spring from various dire situations such as:

• Accidents involving fire or exposure to extreme heat

• Electrical accidents

• Chemical exposures

• Defective products leading to overheating or combustion

These incidences can cause emotional trauma and irreversible damage besides physical harm. Burn injuries bear significant hardships— ranging from painful treatments, permanent disfigurement or disability, loss of income due to inability to work, insurmountable medical bills, emotional trauma—to name a few.

But fear not! At Carlson Bier, we employ a personalized approach based on your individual circumstances and requirements ensuring appropriate steps are taken towards gaining rightful aspirations and reducing unnecessary burdens on you throughout this overwhelming ordeal.

While handling burn cases entails complex litigation battles involving multiple facets such as liability laws and insurance policies — it’s essential not to become lost in the procedural labyrinth before obtaining maximum compensation deserved by you.

One critical aspect lies in determining fault correctly—is it because of someone else’s negligent action resulting in your severe burn? Or could it be traced back to a property owner failing their responsibility?

Determining one’s negligence involves addressing several factors including:

– Proving they had a proactive duty towards preventing harm (a restaurant must ensure safety standards)

– Identifying violation/ignorance of this duty (if a gas leak wasn’t addressed, leading to an explosion)

– Establishing linkages between the negligence and resultant injury (your burns directly caused by the cascade starting with their disregard)

Our expertise helps us portray convincingly how these aspects play out in your unique case, pressurizing defendant parties to acknowledge their fault thereby facilitating adequate compensation for your sufferings.

As esteemed personal injury attorneys, we understand even ideal monetary compensation can’t erase tragic experiences. Nonetheless, it may cushion you against mounting medical bills besides extending a comforting promise of assured support going forward.

More so, punitive damages could also be claimed if defendants are proven guilty of reckless measures causing injuries—sending a strong deterrent message to other potential wrongdoers as well.

Let’s not forget that time is crucial — Illinois law stipulates victims should present any personal injury claim within two years from the date of occurrence. Neglecting this legal deadline might lead to loss of your right to access rightful claims later—another reason why swift professional help stands vital.

Lastly—it’s crucial understanding complexities surrounding burn injuries shouldn’t dissuade you from battling for justice or striving towards recovery—a fact well-grounded at Carlson Bier.

We pride ourselves on easing tough times through comprehensive legal aid tuned explicitly towards your best interests based on experienced reflections and judicious moves working effectively alongside associated insurance entities aiming at securing desirable trial outcomes or negotiating robust settlements if needed.

Dealing with a burn injury is incredibly difficult. However, having knowledgeable and compassionate advocates from Carlson Bier team by your side can indeed make all the difference! To gain insight into what our determined legal representation entails beyond words displayed here—and detailed evaluation worthiness of your case —we invite you wholeheartedly to click on the button below today.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Smithton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Smithton

Areas of Practice in Smithton

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing skilled legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Medical Negligence

Offering experienced legal assistance for clients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering adept legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Slip Accidents

Adept in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking justice for their damages.

Neonatal Harms

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Incidents

Collisions: Devoted to supporting victims of car accidents get reasonable compensation for harms and damages.

Bike Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Collision

Delivering adept legal services for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Harms

Focused on offering expert legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in tackling cases for persons who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Specializing in defending persons with spine impairments, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​