Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Smithton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has experienced a spinal cord injury, it is crucial to seek legal representation from an experienced law firm. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into play. We are renowned for our specialization in Spinal Cord Injuries litigation throughout Illinois and across Smithton. As experts in personal injury law, we understand the complexity of Spinal Cord Injuries cases and the importance of securing justice and financial compensation for our clients.

The focus at Carlson Bier remains on providing personalized attention while navigating through these complex situations for each client affected by such injuries. Our dedicated attorneys tirelessly work towards finding avenues that ensure maximum compensation, making us an optimal choice when searching for optimum advocacy.

Trusting us will not only offer professional legal counsel but also results-oriented action plans tailored to individual needs – all from professionals who deeply understand what you’re going through.

Navigating matters related with spinal cord injuries can be overwhelming without expert assistance. So why wait? Let Carlson Bier take reins of your case today to help restore justice and lend strength during this difficult time.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Smithton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we stand as experts in spinal cord injury cases, drawing on our vast experience and legal acumen to represent you. Each year in Illinois, countless individuals endure the devastating aftermath of spinal cord injuries, which enterprisingly affect their quality of life and strain their financial resources. As a personal injury law firm profoundly based in Illinois, we endeavor to be your committed advocate, seeking justice for your pain and suffering while alleviating the weighty financial burden associated with spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries tend to originate from diverse causes that may include vehicle accidents, medical malpractice or even slips and falls. Depending on the severity and location of the affliction, symptoms can range widely from mild numbness or tingling sensation to total paralysis – paraplegia or quadriplegia – with detrimental effects on mobility and other bodily functions like respiratory system control. Unfortunately for most victims facing this harrowing ordeal, these impairments necessitate long-term medical care that is at once costly and psychologically draining.

• Overcoming challenges: We understand that no amount of compensation will undo physical damage; yet it’s our pledge to ensure that you receive maximum reimbursement possible to offset costs tied to lifetime medical care.

• Offering guidance: We assure empathetic support throughout the entire legal process; consulting with respected experts such as neurologists or life care planners instrumental when building a comprehensive claim regarding its current impact plus future expenses.

• Crafting formidable strategies: Our attorneys diligently combine extensive investigative methods with unmatched negotiation skills hence ensuring successful litigations leading ultimately into substantial settlements.

The full scope of a spinal cord injury often transcends beyond immediate physical hurt. Secondary complications like pneumonia or pressure sores are common occurrences post-injury frequently compounding health issues further requiring additional treatments. Similarly significant is an often overlooked aspect – Emotional Trauma brought about by drastic lifestyle alterations coupled with chronic pain manifestations adding up onto stress plus mental anguish parameters taken into consideration during claim computation.

Proactively engaging a seasoned personal injury lawyer from Carlson Bier translates to leveraging our expertise and heightened focus on pursuing full compensation including damages pertaining to:

• Medical bills: Current or anticipated, these may feature hospital stays, surgical interventions, therapies like physical rehabilitation alongside medical equipment.

• Lost wages: Past lost earnings due to injury-related work absence plus future diminished earning capacity if the client’s capability to work is permanently impaired.

• Pain and suffering: Incorporating both physical discomforts directly attributable to the accident plus psychological distress constitutes an integral part of damage assessments.

Recognizing that every spinal cord injury case presents unique intricacies, we approach each with individualized precision. We view it as paramount necessity understanding your specific circumstances comprehensively before expounding on most beneficial legal options aligned with your best interests.

Crucially, entrusting us at Carlson Bier implies bringing onboard an Illinois based law firm decisively committed towards asserting your rights while alleviating presumably overpowering financial pressures wrought by mounting medical obligations associated typically with spinal cord injuries. Our remarkable track-record in procuring favorable judgements endeared by clients across Illinois further testifies our legal acumen underscored by dedication towards client-centric services accommodating virtually all types of personal injuries involving spinal cord trauma aside from others alike car accidents or malpractice suits too.

Ergo, give yourself peace of mind allowing us relieving non-legal stress factored additionally by spiraling aberrations courtesy disability concerns and/or occupation disruptions subsequent occupational readjustments seeking commensurately just compensations for unexpected hardships befallen you unawarely. By clicking the button below see estimably how much could potentially be claimed facing similar predicaments ensuring clear transparency thereby instituting realistically achievable objectives complemented holistically along this undoubtedly arduous yet infinitely rewarding journey together ahead promising unparalleled success deservedly rightfully yours henceforth!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Smithton Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Smithton

Areas of Practice in Smithton

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing specialist legal assistance for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Physician Negligence

Ensuring dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Stumble Accidents

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Providing legal help for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Incidents

Incidents: Focused on supporting victims of car accidents get fair payout for damages and damages.

Motorbike Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Semi Crash

Extending specialist legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Committed to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Neurological Traumas

Specializing in delivering dedicated legal services for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Skilled in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Focused on defending persons with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer