FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in South Roxana

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you are a victim of slip and fall accidents in South Roxana, it is phemenally important to have reliable representation on your side. Turn to Carlson Bier for diligent and accomplished legal advocacy. As experts in personal injury law with an established reputation across Illinois, we understand the intricacies of such incidents to undertake formidable action towards securing fair compensation for you. Armed with comprehensive knowledge about local regulations and stationed at the forefront in handling complex litigation related to slip and fall cases, Carlson Bier is adept at ensuring your rights are protected while addressing each element crucially that merits your case’s success. If you’ve been injured due to dangerous conditions or negligence from property owners anywhere within South Roxana parameters, trust us at Carlson Bier as we dedicate our practice exclusively towards recovering what’s rightfully yours efficiently and without delay.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in South Roxana Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in advocating for individuals who have suffered the unfortunate circumstance of slip and fall accidents. As experienced personal injury lawyers based in Illinois, we bring to bear our extensive legal acumen, supported by a compassionate approach that handles every case with utmost clarity and detail-oriented strategies.

Slip and fall accidents are more common than one might imagine, often resulting in not just physical trauma but emotional distress and financial hardship as well. In many instances, these slips or trip-ups occur because of conditions such as uneven flooring, wet surfaces devoid of caution signage, poor lighting obscuring visibility or obstacles left haphazardly on pedestrian pathways.

To understand the nuances better:

• It’s critical to realize that not all slip and fall incidents constitute legal cases.

• It is upon establishing clear negligence on part of the property owners that you can file a claim effectively.

• Such negligence refers to the owner’s awareness about the hazardous condition yet failure to rectify it timely or provide adequate warning signs.

Often victims underestimate their case strength due to lack of knowledge about Illinois laws pertaining to premises liability claims. Consequently, this underlines the significance why professional legal counsel like us at Carlson Bier is necessary- We educate you on your rights while devising an effective plan tailored specifically for your requirements.

Understandably then:

• Accidents categorized as ‘slip and fall’ are part of broader ‘premises liability’ lawsuits wherein store owners or homeowners may be held accountable if an injury occurs owing to unsafe conditions

• Legal compensation received from successful claims include covering medical expenses both past and future, lost wages due to incapacitation post-fall or lifetime care support in severe disability situations

• The statute of limitations plays a crucial role hence any delay jeopardizes your chances at damages recovery

Approaching insurance companies single-handedly exposes clients risks like inadequate settlements without full spectrum analysis. Hence our primary aim surrounds protecting each victim’s right to just compensation. Our personalized approach places your well-being at the center of our spectrum, walking you through each step as we shoulder all legal burdens presenting your case compellingly for damage recovery.

Our reputation hinges on one simple fact- We Care. Carlson Bier takes extreme pride in successfully helping victims recover resolute settlements and judgements that honestly reflect their sufferings’ true cost. No injury is ever minor; each brings about significant changes impacting lives depending upon severity.

We invite you to take control of the situation by letting us help you pursue justice taking into account all your losses- physical, financial or emotional. Don’t let your sense of worth waiver under insurance pressure; educating yourself is the first stride towards an empowering decision making process.

Your current predicament might be challenging but remember, you are not alone in this journey. At Carlson Bier law firm, we strive to bring clarity amidst confusion providing answers rather than questions so that every victim understands they have a friend who values their cause.

On top of it:

• Evaluations are free and completely confidential

• Representation fees applicable only if successful with case resolution

The battle may be difficult but it becomes considerably simpler when armed with knowledge and confidence instilled by having experienced professionals like Carlson Bier guiding you. Are you curious to know what your case might warrant? Empower yourself today; permit us to fight tirelessly on your behalf while ensuring each facet of the claim process navigated efficiently and effectively.

We welcome any inquiries or doubts because our clients’ best interest always remains our foremost priority.r Eager to understand how much precisely does your case merit? By clicking on the button below connect further with us directly for an accurate estimate tailored specifically as per unique personal circumstances shaping up potentially strong cases ready for success conversion – Standing tall with Carlson Bier – Your Partner in Justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Roxana Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in South Roxana

Areas of Practice in South Roxana

Bike Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Giving professional legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Negligence

Delivering specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Obligation

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending adept legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Abuse

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Trip Accidents

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Newborn Wounds

Offering legal aid for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Accidents: Devoted to assisting patients of car accidents receive fair payout for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Delivering specialist legal representation for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Harms

Specializing in delivering compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Death

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal guidance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Injury

Expert in representing victims with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​