Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in South Roxana

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with devastating spinal cord injuries, selecting qualified legal representation is of utmost importance. For South Roxana residents others in nearby locations battling these life-altering circumstances, Carlson Bier law firm offers unmatched expertise and dedication to their plight. Their extensive knowledge in regards to spinal cord injury litigation ensures clients can access the comprehensive assistance needed during such challenging times. Harnessing decades-long experience as personal injury lawyers, they zealously advocate for their clientele’s rights, tirelessly working towards securing rightful compensation that adequately reflects the severity of these injuries and consequent repercussions on quality of life. With an impressive track record cementing their prowess within this field, those grappling with these traumatic incidents find a formidable ally and trusted partner in Carlson Bier’s reputable team. The sophisticated level at which cases are handled underscores not just a deep understanding of Illinois laws governing such matters but also empathy for each client’s unique situation—punctuating why they remain a top choice for anyone seeking justice following debilitating Spinal Cord Injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in South Roxana Illinois

The Carlson Bier law firm is a prominent Illinois-based legal practice specializing in providing expert representation to victims of personal injury. One of the areas we focus on is delivering informed guidance and tenacious litigation for individuals who have suffered from Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). These injuries, often resulting from automobile accidents, slips and falls, or medical malpractices, involve damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. They tend to cause profound changes in strength, sensation and other body functions below the site of the injury.

Understanding the implication of SCI requires an interdisciplinary approach as it affects numerous aspects of a victim’s life. There are multiple levels of spinal cord injuries, each having varied implications for mobility and functionality. The higher up on your spine where an injury takes place typically presents more severe consequences; broadly categorized into two types:

– Complete: A complete injury implies that there’s no function below the level of injury; meaning no sensation and no voluntary movement.

– Incomplete: An incomplete injury means there’s some functioning below the primary level of injury.

Apart from physical changes, Spinal Cord Injuries may also trigger mental-health consequences like depression due to alterations in one’s lifestyle or self-image post-injury.

Pursuing justice after suffering SCI can be daunting given its complex nature. This emphasizes why you need skilled trauma attorneys like our team at Carlson Bier advocating for your rights. We champion comprehensive compensation beyond basic medical costs; this includes long-term care needs such as rehabilitation therapy expenses, pain management therapy charges, home modifications expenditures related to wheelchair accessibility.

Additionally important is addressing loss earnings potential if your ability to work has been affected by your injuries or having allowances made for emotional trauma resulting from living with a lifelong disability. Our seasoned lawyers will engage expert witnesses like doctors and life-care planners who can testify about these unique requirements associated with living with SCIs.

Whether through negotiation or court trial, our goal remains unchanging; to secure maximal settlements for our clients. Our track record of securing multiple multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements demonstrate our expertise and commitment towards this cause.

It’s essential to note that time is an imperative factor when asserting on personal injury claims in Illinois as the state imposes a statute of limitations–a certain period within which you are entitled to bring your litigation. Hence, we advise seeking legal counsel immediately after such unfortunate incidents occur, enabling decisive measures to be implemented promptly.

Carlson Bier’s proficiency extends to all counties across Illinois. Nevertheless, it’s important to clarify that while we serve clients throughout the state, our physical offices are not located in South Roxana; maintaining distance with deceptive advertising practices—firmly against Illinois law—is paramount.

Behind every spinal cord injury is a life dramatically altered and a story needing telling. At Carlson Bier, we’re not just attorneys; we’re staunch supporters advocating for your right to justice –fighting relentlessly until full compensation prevails.

Understanding the breadth of these complexities can be overwhelming—that’s why we’re committed to standing beside you every step along the journey; bringing clarity amidst chaos while rendering expert legal assistance.

To help enlighten potential paths ahead for SCI victims, their families or caregivers considering possible civil action options after an unfortunate incident leading up to spinal cord damage—the next precedence step becomes assessing how much your case could be worth. Deciding this crucial point depends extensively on specifics unique only unto each occurrence: medical costs now and later stages coupled with intangible damages e.g lost liveliness enjoyment etcetera.

Trusting legal experts like ourselves at Carlson Bier imparts confidence about promising outcomes; because knowing property rights also means understanding what Modern Jurisprudence opines concerning valuations regarding familial love loss—you deserve quality representation demanding laudable compensation amplifying possibilities future holds hope-filled despite otherwise-viewed incapacitations SCIs occasion some victims.

Contact Carlson Bier today by clicking the button below for a comprehensive case evaluation—know your rights, understand your options, and discover how much your personal injury claim could be worth.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Roxana Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in South Roxana

Areas of Practice in South Roxana

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering professional legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Physician Negligence

Offering professional legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering professional legal assistance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Slip Accidents

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking restitution for their injuries.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Crashes: Focused on helping victims of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for damages and losses.

Bike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Truck Crash

Providing expert legal assistance for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Harms

Committed to offering compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in handling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in advocating for individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer