...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in South Shore

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When involved in a bicycle accident in South Shore, securing proficient legal representation is vital. Carlson Bier is an exceptional choice as your Bicycle Accidents attorney group. Our acclaimed firm, based out of Illinois, has built its reputation on effective, compassionate client service and superior lawsuit results. We have the knowledge and expertise necessary to navigate complex bicycle accident cases effectively. With extensive experience litigating for victims’ rights and negotiating with insurance companies across Illinois, we are committed to achieving optimal compensation for affected victims or their families after a bicycling mishap. Our law firm’s effectiveness hinges upon thorough case preparation and aggressive advocacy – traits held by each of our distinguished attorneys at Carlson Bier. Trust us to prevent any party from infringing upon your rights or liberties after a cycling accident because safeguarding clients’ interests embodies our mission statement at Carlson Bier Law Firm – doing what’s right when it matters most! Choose us today; let’s fight this battle together!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in South Shore Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our dedication lies in providing quality and reliable legal services to those who have been wrongfully injured. One area we specialize in is bicycle accidents, a category of personal injury that often goes unnoticed despite its potential for severe damage. Our firm based in Illinois has a deep understanding of the complex issues surrounding these types of incidents and is committed to protecting your rights.

Bicycle accidents are tragically common occurrences which can result from several causes – vehicle driver negligence being paramount. A motorist may fail to adequately look out for bicyclists thereby causing avoidable crashes, or they might not respect designated bicycle lanes forcing bikers into dangerous situations. Other factors can include poor road conditions, defective bike parts, or the cyclist’s own lapse in attention.

Understanding the dynamics of a bike accident plays an integral part when navigating towards justice and compensation:

– Proof of liability: It involves establishing through evidence that the accident was caused due to someone’s negligence.

– Damages claimed: Victims may be entitled to damages such as medical expenses, pain & suffering, loss of earnings due to time off work etc.

– Bicycle laws: The state laws vary when it comes to bicycles on roads – knowledge about local bylaws thus becomes crucial during representation.

The extent and nature of injuries sustained tend to vary widely in case of a bicycle accidents. Ranging from minor cuts and abrasions to life-altering head trauma or spinal cord injuries – all require immediate addressal within any claim process. We at Carlson Bier understand this dire need and tailor our representation accordingly.

Insurance complexities often serve as an obstacle when claiming damages post-collision. Auto insurance policies might cover cyclists involved in traffic collisions but familiarizing oneself with specifics is essential before seeking recompense. More so because certain insurances allow stacking privileges where one might use their car’s under-insured/ un-insured clause even while cycling; whereas others prevent crash-related claims if one uses their bicycle for a sport or race.

In Illinois, the statute of limitations requires you to take action within two years from the accident date. Time is crucial in cases revolving around personal injuries and seeking legal advice promptly post-incident could potentially safeguard from losing your right to file a lawsuit at all. As your trusted legal partner, we at Carlson Bier are adept at maneuvering these intricate timelines thereby assuring that your reparation claims are precisely tended to.

Navigating through bicycle accidents can be daunting with its diverse aspects such as insurance specifics, gathering evidence, establishing liability among others. Rest assured, our experienced team harnesses these challenges confidently bringing you closer to justice while keeping you informed every step of the way.

Our passionate involvement towards ensuring rightful compensation extends beyond just court trials – also encapsulating case evaluations prior acceptance. An integral part of our initial consultation includes evaluating the merit in pursuing litigation based on factors like available evidence and potential damages; thus providing you an understanding about not just how much but whether it’s feasible filing a law suit at all.

Serious bicycle injuries require serious attention—for both medical recovery and legal representation. Act now before essential evidence disappears or memories fade—seek professional assistance when dealing with complications arising due to bicycle accidents. Suffering due to another’s negligence should never be ignored therefore click on the button below for Carlson Bier’s attorneys to evaluate your situation and determine what your case is worth without any further obligations.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For South Shore Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in South Shore

Areas of Practice in South Shore

Cycling Incidents

Expert in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving skilled legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Extending professional legal advice for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving faulty products, delivering professional legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Stumble Injuries

Adept in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Crashes: Focused on helping clients of car accidents gain appropriate settlement for damages and destruction.

Motorcycle Collisions

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Collision

Extending adept legal services for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for injuries.

Building Site Accidents

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Traumas

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal services for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at handling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Fatality

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure restitution.

Spine Trauma

Dedicated to defending individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​