FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in South Shore

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one have suffered from dog bite injuries in South Shore, it’s essential to secure legal representation promptly. Carlson Bier is the standout choice among law firms within this niche legal matter. We bring unmatched expertise and extensive experience dealing with Dog Bite Injuries cases, making us uniquely qualified to handle your case effectively and efficiently. Our attorneys possess comprehensive knowledge about Illinois regulations concerning dog bites and animal attack liability. With their razor-sharp advocacy skills coupled with compassionate understanding of the traumatic effects associated with such incidents, our team fights relentlessly for just compensation for our clients’ physical and emotional suffering – ensuring peace of mind alongside justice assertion. Trusting Carlson Bier means entrusting your fight against unfair consequences of unforeseen canine attacks in capable hands that will not rest until they’ve secured what you deserve under the confines of Illinois law regarding Dog Bite claims. Make an informed choice; choose dedicated professionalism – choose Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in South Shore Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your premier legal advocates specializing in personal injury cases, including dog bite injuries. We are a distinguished law firm based in Illinois and we stand behind our reputation for delivering astute legal guidance and tireless representation for our clients.

Dog bite injuries can be traumatic physically and emotionally, leaving victims with significant medical expenses, psychological distress, loss of earnings and much more. When faced with these challenging circumstances, you need a competent ally by your side who is conversant with the intricacies of Illinois laws pertaining to dog bites. Our team at Carlson Bier offers this exact expertise.

We believe education empowers our clients in their pursuit of justice; hence it is essential that everyone understands the gravity of dog bite cases. The Center for Disease Control reports that about 4.5 million people suffer from dog bites annually; approximately one out of five bites becomes infected while others require serious medical attention including surgeries.

In the state of Illinois:

• Owners are liable if their dogs attack or attempt to attack a person without provocation;

• Injured parties can sue for damages including cosmetic surgery requirements resulting from bite wounds;

• If a dog has been deemed “dangerous” based on previous behavior, then any attacks result in higher penalties against the owner.

From an emotional standpoint:

• Victims may suffer traumatic stress disorders akin to PTSD;

• They might develop cynophobia (fear of dogs) which can have long-term effects especially in children;

• These emotional factors contribute as noneconomic damages since they affect quality of life.

At Carlson Bier we present comprehensive legal support right from the initial consultation through claim negotiations until achieving a satisfactory verdict or settlement. We understand that every case is unique thus our strategic approach considers all individual factors pertinent to each client’s situation.

We provide expert navigation around complexities such as proving negligence – vital in building strong defense strategies or pursuing aggressive litigation when needed on behalf of our clients.

Our competent lawyers assist with:

• Identifying liable parties- which may be more than one in cases involving multiple dogs, commercial breeders or dog-sitting services;

• Documenting evidences properly to maintain their authenticity and admissibility during trials;

• Vigorously defending against common defense tactics from other parties or insurance companies aiming to reduce the compensation amounts.

We empathize that victims have already endured physical pain and stress; hence our commitment is towards ensuring that your legal journey remains as smooth and hassle-free as possible.

Our record speaks of successful verdicts and settlements obtained for our clients attributing to millions of dollars. Our focus is always on maximizing compensation whether it comes from negotiation or litigation so that you can cover medical expenses for both immediate needs and future care, lost wages, pain, suffering, emotional trauma etc.

Moreover, Carlson Bier operates on a contingency fee basis meaning you don’t owe any fees until we win your case.

Are you wondering how much your case might be worth? The answer partially holds in evaluating accurately the extent of damages suffered including current/future financial impact due to loss of earnings/medical requirements along with factors touching emotional distress and overall quality of life after the incident.

The best way forward for an accurate assessment is by getting professional legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. Therefore please reach out. Click on the button below today – find out how much value your claim holds regarding potential compensation payout amounts waiting for you! Through Carlson Bier’s experience, dedication & customized support each step along – ensure justice will not only be done but also seen being done in retributive measures through rightful compensations!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Shore Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in South Shore

Areas of Practice in South Shore

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending adept legal support for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal services for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal assistance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Trip Mishaps

Expert in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking redress for their damages.

Neonatal Damages

Extending legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents secure just settlement for hurts and damages.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Semi Incident

Delivering professional legal representation for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Head Damages

Focused on delivering expert legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Skilled in tackling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and experienced legal services to ensure compensation.

Neural Impairment

Committed to defending victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440