FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in South Shore

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a pedestrian accident, expertise and experience should never be compromised when seeking legal representation. Carlson Bier comes forward as your trusted ally in such dire circumstances. Specializing in personal injury law with an emphasis on Pedestrian Accident related cases, we can meticulously navigate through Illinois state laws that govern these matters to protect your rights and advocate for proper compensation. With years of know-how under our belt, Carlson Bier is ready to deliver informed guidance that aligns with citizen’s needs in South Shore. As opposed to working alone or settling without professional aid, allowing us to handle intricacies might spell the difference between minimal recompense and full justified settlement value you might not even realize you’re eligible for! Understanding the turmoil attached with being a pedestrian accident victim, Carlson Bier is committed towards securing optimal results by leveraging extensive knowledge of Illinois law mechanics pertaining pedestrian accidents-focused actions. Trust in specialized proficiency; trust in Carlson Bier—a name synonymous with success.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in South Shore Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our team of dedicated personal injury attorneys understands the fine complexities and implications that are inherent in pedestrian accidents. As your counsel, we guide you through the difficult period after such an incident occurs by providing strategic legal advice coupled with compassionate support.

In Illinois, every year thousands of pedestrians become victims to unfortunate accidents. These cases can be fraught with uncertainty as they involve a plethora of factors such as negotiating with insurance companies, gauging liabilities, determining accident factors and identifying responsible parties.

Several key points underline the importance of seeking knowledgeable legal representation in these scenarios:

– Personal injury law extends beyond merely guaranteeing compensation for physical damages; it also encompasses areas such as mental anguish and lost wages due to injury.

– Being represented by experienced lawyers ensures swift and smooth negotiations with insurance companies — something that could be overwhelming for victims or their families.

– As procedural requirements can vary based on individual circumstances surrounding an accident, entrusting the task to professional attorneys circumvents potential pitfalls down the line.

At Carlson Bier, our approach hinges on being thorough and detail-oriented when confronting each new case. We commit ourselves fully to examining evidence meticulously, aiding clients in obtaining necessary medical documentation, interviewing witnesses if applicable packaging all accumulated information into compelling arguments favouring maximum compensation.

We believe in proactively communicating with clients throughout their recovery journey — from comprehending what happened during those crucial moments leading up to the accident straight through to completely wrapping up your claim. On our part, we ensure absolute transparency letting you know where you stand at any given time while respecting your need for space and healing.

Moreover agility is a cornerstone of how we function here at Carlson Bier — recognizing that no two cases are identical; we allocate resources keeping in mind specific intricacies pertaining each unique situation stemming from pedestrian incidents. To make this possible we have built a robust network within Illinois’ medical community who aid us corroborate facts relevantly thereby lending massive credibility to your claim.

We put forth this information with the singular aim of reducing any feeling of disorientation you may be experiencing post an unfortunate occurrence. Knowledge is indeed power — as advocates for your rights after a pedestrian accident, we hope that learning more about Carlson Bier’s commitment and robust capabilities brings you significant value.

An important aspect to know about obtaining legal support in Illinois is that there are no up front costs; we operate on contingency basis i.e., our fees are contingent upon us securing victory and compensation in your favour. So effectively, if we can’t win it for you, you owe us nothing.

As advocates against injustice, Carlson Bier invites all victims of pedestrian accidents or their families who may have questions regarding their case to avail a free consultation via clicking the button below. Secure insight into what your case may potentially be worth coupled with crucial clarifications around laws surrounding personal injuries within state limits.

Ultimately, Carlson Bier is committed to advocating for those victimized by pedestrian accidents through unwavering determination and imparting excellent advice born from experience. Arm yourself with knowledge unfurling complexities surrounding these incidents while equipping your strife for justice. Embolden yourself today – seek answers, seek results; discover just how much potential your case possibly holds by taking control now.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Shore Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in South Shore

Areas of Practice in South Shore

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Fire Injuries

Giving adept legal advice for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Negligence

Extending dedicated legal advice for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Trip Injuries

Skilled in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking redress for their damages.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Dedicated to aiding individuals of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Semi Accident

Offering experienced legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for losses.

Building Site Crashes

Dedicated to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Committed to delivering specialized legal services for victims suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and experienced legal representation to ensure restitution.

Neural Impairment

Focused on assisting patients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440