...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Steger

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve experienced a dog bite injury in Steger, trust the dedicated legal team at Carlson Bier to robustly represent your interests. Specializing solely in personal injury cases, our astute attorneys bring their wealth of expertise to deal specifically with dog bite injuries. We understand the pain, trauma and potential long-term consequences these incidents can cause and that is why we leave no stone unturned when striving for justice on your behalf. With comprehensive knowledge of Illinois law, specifically how it pertains to animal attacks, our team will vehemently fight for fair compensation from negligent parties responsible for untold suffering inflicted by their pets. Our lawyers’ prowess at negotiating settlements or arguing cases judiciously till verdicts stand us out as unique partners who prioritize clients’ best interest above all else. At Carlson Bier, you are not just another case number; we offer personalized care tailored towards maximizing your claim’s chances of success while minimizing the distress endured during this traumatic time in Steger pertaining to dog bite injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Steger Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the stress and physical discomforts dog bite injuries can cause. Such incidents often result in severe physical harm which may include infection risks, psychological trauma, nerve damage, and scarring, among other repercussions. When you or a loved one becomes a victim of such an unfortunate event, it’s crucial to have competent lawyers like our team to provide the best possible legal assistance.

Dog bites are more common than most people realize. Every year in Illinois alone, numerous residents suffer from these types of injuries. Many cases go unreported because victims are unaware they have legal rights concerning these incidents. At the Carlson Bier law firm, we strive to educate our clients on their rights and guide them through the complexities of Illinois’ animal control laws.

The primary points for any case involving dog bites involve clearly identifying if negligence was involved – Did the owner fail to properly restrain their dog? What breed is the dog? Where did the incident occur? These are critical specifics needed to establish liability effectively.

One highlight under Illinois law is that we’re not restricted by certain conditions prevalent in other states such as “one-bite rules.” This rule gives owners a ‘free pass’ for their pets first attack; however this condition doesn’t apply here. In Illinois, victims don’t need to prove that the owner knew their canine was dangerous before biting someone.

• Determining Liability: Our attorneys at Carlson Bier skillfully navigate through all facets of your case – pinpointing pivotal details such as leash-law violations or previous aggressive nature of the pet.

• Gathering Evidence: We meticulously accumulate comprehensive evidence including medical bills/records and photographs showcasing injury severity along with witness testimonies augmenting your claim.

• Negotiating Compensation Claims: Using gathered proof substantiating your claim helps us negotiate better compensation terms with insurance companies who typically attempt lowball settlement offers.

We want you informed about how significantly personal injury claims benefit from having legal representation. When it comes to dog bite incidents, the law clearly outlines that victims deserve fair compensation for their injuries and related costs. This can include medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering as well as future costs of surgical procedures for scar reduction or psychological counseling.

Getting bitten by a dog is traumatic enough without worrying about the legal complexities involved in seeking due justice. Allow our experienced team at Carlson Bier to fight fiercely on your behalf – meticulously scrutinizing every facet of your case while striving relentlessly towards securing the compensation you rightfully deserve.

We are deeply rooted in our commitment towards providing unmatched personalized attention to your case – treating you with the dignity and respect you rightly merit during such tumultuous times. Our client-focused approach eases feelings of overwhelm associated with mounting medical expenses combined with untold physical discomforts proceeding from an unfortunate incident like this.

Remember: If anyone tells you “it’s just a dog bite,” they are failing to see beyond mere surface level scars into more profound issues these incidents trigger. Furthermore, anyone asserting that courtrooms only deal with ‘serious cases’ fundamentally misunderstand certain premises underpinning our justice system ensuring everyone obtains accessible redressal mechanisms irrespective of incident severity levels.

With Carlson Bier advocating for your rights vigorously, rest assured knowing we leave no stone unturned working tirelessly towards obtaining maximum compensation permissible within procedural purviews.

Being a victim in Illinois entitles one greatly to redressing grievances inflicted by others’ recklessness or negligence via comprehensive legal measures provided under our state’s jurisdiction. Applying appropriate expertise coupled with compassion ensures navigating through arduous legal pathways becomes significantly less daunting.

The culmination point lies here – understand what your claim could be worth by merely clicking on the button below! Exploring demands no obligation or cost whatsoever. All it requires is that initial step towards realizing where exactly you stand legally given your unique situation.

This realization serves dual purposes – not only does it provide insight into broader perspectives guiding legal compensation processes underpinning dog bite cases, but it also instills a sense of confidence knowing you’re championed by the best attorneys dedicated to securing justice. Trust in the unparalleled expertise of Carlson Bier – because your case is our mission!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Steger Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Steger

Areas of Practice in Steger

Bike Mishaps

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering specialist legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Clinical Negligence

Providing dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal guidance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Tumble Occurrences

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Mishaps: Focused on assisting individuals of car accidents gain reasonable recompense for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing adept legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Concentrated on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to extending professional legal services for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Committed to assisting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer