...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Sterling

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re the victim of a dog bite injury in Sterling, choosing Carlson Bier to represent your case provides assurance and expertise. As seasoned personal injury attorneys, our law firm understands Illinois’s complex dog bite laws intimately. We have successfully handled countless cases similar to yours and take pride in securing justice for clients afflicted by canine aggression incidents. Through strategic representation, we help victims receive fair compensation covering medical costs, emotional distress or lost wages due to recovery time off work. At Carlson Bier, we go the extra mile ensuring that every client’s needs are met with compassion and legal prowess while remaining compliant with Illinois State Law on attorney advertising practices `Covering a broad spectrum including severe mauling attacks or minor scrapes –our team at Carlson Bier efficiently guides you through this strenuous process. Regardless of where you reside within Illinois borders – from Sterling to Springfield – when enduring such an unfortunate incident as a dog bite injury; trusting us enables swift restitution for occurring damages caused by another’s negligence.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Sterling Illinois

In the realm of personal injury, a dog bite incident can significantly impact an individual’s quality of life. At Carlson Bier, an esteemed law firm situated in Illinois, we understand the magnitude of such incidents and strive to provide exceptional legal assistance for dog bite victims. As experienced personal injury attorneys keenly aware of state and local ordinances surrounding public safety associated with domestic animals, our principal objective is advocating on behalf of those injured from dog bites.

Illinois stands as one state that operates under strict liability laws regarding dog bites. This means pet owners are virtually always held liable when their pet harms another person unless there was provocative behavior from the victim or they were unlawfully on the owner’s private property during the attack. These aspects emphasize that recovery rights hinge heavily on intricate details surrounding cases which our seasoned team at Carlson Bier handles expertly to ascertain maximum compensation for victims.

Dog Bite injuries commonly inflict not just physical but emotional trauma; leading potentially debilitating fear of dogs (cynophobia), psychological distress or disfiguring scars. The aftermath often includes costly medical expenses—for surgeries or rabies vaccinations—and potential loss in wages due to incapacitation meriting rightful restitution.

Peruse below some critical considerations handled meticulously by us at Carlson Bier:

• Factual Investigation: We gather valid evidence—photos, witness testimonies—to demonstrate harm directly attributable to the dogs’ aggressiveness.

• Thorough Medical Documentation: A detailed account helps indicate severity reacting proportionately recovering all damages—physical pain, suffering; monetary outlays or lost earnings caused by immobilization.

• Proof Establishment: In alignment with predominant ‘one bite rule’ clause we corroborate lack of victim’s instigative actions alongside unlawful trespassing over owner’s land eliminating any diffuse responsibility attempts.

• Insurance Company Negotiation: Familiarity with deceptive techniques employed equips us better averting unfair settlement offerings while embracing rightful claims cost settlements instead!

The discrepancy between contractual terms on paper versus actual execution keeps many prospective victims apprehensive about legal recourse avenues post dog bite incidences. Yet, at Carlson Bier, our commitment is unwavering; recognizing each claim’s distinctiveness while advocating fervently to secure best possible compensation settlements.

Your journey towards claiming deserved recompense begins with understanding potentials of your existing predicament. Embrace the opportunity today and click below to discern an approximate worth of your case. With CARLSON BIER’s expert consultation alongside, stride ahead confidently to claiming your lawful entitlements in wake of unanticipated dog bite incidents!

Strictly adhering to Illinois advertisement laws—we never falsely imply our physical presence—CARLSON BIER steadfastly serves across Illinois exhibiting consummate prowess in championing personal injury claims inclusively dealing with dog bites thereby ensuring appropriate damages recoveries for those unintentionally harmed by such unfortunate instances. Reach out today, trust us and convert your distress into success by legally securing what is rightfully yours!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sterling Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Sterling

Areas of Practice in Sterling

Cycling Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying skilled legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Delivering expert legal advice for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, offering professional legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Stumble Injuries

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking compensation for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Crashes: Focused on aiding clients of car accidents receive appropriate payout for harms and losses.

Motorcycle Collisions

Focused on providing legal support for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Incident

Extending professional legal representation for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for harms.

Construction Site Incidents

Focused on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Focused on extending dedicated legal support for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in handling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Expert in defending clients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​