...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Sterling

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the uncertain aftermath of a pedestrian accident, finding an experienced attorney can provide peace of mind. Carlson Bier is renowned for their skill in representing pedestrian accident victims across Illinois, and Sterling area is no exception. Their insightful advice and assertive representation aim to secure just compensation for your pain, losses, or any injuries sustained during accidents. Renowned for their thorough knowledge on relevant laws, comprehensive investigation proficiency and exceptional negotiation skills with insurance companies; Carlson Bier’s commitment goes beyond standard needs—it extends to delivering results that count when protecting clients’ rights after unfortunate incidents occur. If you are not attuned with the legal complexities surrounding this traumatic experience in Sterling city or anywhere within Illinois’s boundaries; allow the impassioned attorneys at Carlson Bier to guide you through each step while safeguarding your interests effectively. Assertively embarking upon a client-first approach without geographical constraints—this is what distinguishes Carlson Bier as your top-tier consideration among Pedestrian Accident Law Firms.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Sterling Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we champion the rights of pedestrians who have become disadvantaged due to accidents on Illinois roads. Our expertise lies in being a steadying presence during these times of distress and effectively navigating through the complexities of personal injury law. Pedestrian accidents often result in traumatic injuries that could fundamentally alter a person’s life experience, and our dedicated lawyers understand this intensely human aspect of our work.

Pedestrians are some of the most vulnerable road users – all it takes is one moment’s distraction or negligence from another party to drastically impact their lives. These accidents can occur under various circumstances including but not limited to reckless driving, failure to yield right-of-way at crosswalks, driving under influence or distracted driving. The ramifications for victims can range from minor physical injuries to debilitating conditions or tragically, fatal casualties.

In setting forth claims stemming from pedestrian accidents, understanding key regulations within Illinois law is crucial:

• According to Illinois Compiled Statutes Sec 625 5/11-1002, drivers must stop and yield at crosswalks when pedestrians are present, regardless if traffic control signals are inoperative or absent.

• As per Sec 625 5/11-1003.1, any driver involved in an accident that results in injury must report it.

• Under Sec 735 ILCS 5/2-1116(c), even if you were partially at fault for your accident; as long as your share of fault was less than 50%, you may still recover compensation.

The team at Carlson Bier is experienced in conducting thorough investigations into such instances – we leave no stone unturned while building compelling cases founded on concrete evidence. We aim for outcomes where our clients receive fair recompense commensurate with the extent of their suffering & loss; bringing together the subdued voices against those who wield power irresponsibly.

We prioritize open communication channels so that common misconceptions about personal injury cases can be clarified, like the ones below:

• You do not necessarily have to go to court – the majority of personal injury claims conclude via settlements.

• Personal injury cases are NOT always long-drawn and time-consuming. High-level negotiations can result in quick effective resolutions.

• The size of your compensation is not solely determined by the insurance policy limits. Additional sources of recovery may be available.

Understanding that costs could be a deterrent to seeking legal help, Carlson Bier follows an empathetic model where charges are on a ‘No win No fee’ basis – essentially reinforcing our philosophy that everyone deserves equal access to justice with no financial hurdles.

Navigating through tough times post accidents takes immense courage and resilience; this journey should never be undertaken alone – you need someone standing shoulder-to-shoulder with you. Allow Carlson Bier to handle the full scope of legalities while you prioritize healing and recuperation.

Your pedestrian accident claim might just be more valuable than what first estimates suggest, and we invite you to explore this further because it’s important for complexities associated with each individual case to be uncovered thoroughly before reaching conclusions about their potential worth. At Carlson Bier, we sincerely believe in informing clients fully so they understand their rights under Illinois law without getting overwhelmed by legal jargon or process complexities.

Remember – justice delayed is justice denied! Don’t let any uncertainty regarding how much your case is potentially worth cause unnecessary delay! Click on the button below right now and find out today – Chanel your strength towards recovering from your injuries while we focus relentlessly on delivering the best outcomes possible for your situation! Let’s walk down this path together towards brighter tomorrows.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sterling Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Sterling

Areas of Practice in Sterling

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Fire Injuries

Offering skilled legal support for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Incompetence

Extending experienced legal services for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal services to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Stumble Mishaps

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Neonatal Wounds

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Collisions: Committed to assisting sufferers of car accidents get fair compensation for harms and impairment.

Bike Incidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Crash

Delivering professional legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for hurts.

Building Site Mishaps

Focused on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cognitive Harms

Committed to offering dedicated legal representation for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Adept at managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Fatality

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in supporting persons with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​