...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Tampico

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Undeniably, suffering a dog bite injury can be a traumatising and life-altering event. Securing the right legal counsel is crucial in these circumstances, hence why Tampico residents turn to Carlson Bier for their outstanding reputation in Dog Bite Injuries representation. Our dedicated team of skilled attorneys understands the nuanced complexities involved in such cases whilst also honouring your need for compassionate support during this distressing time. We are adept at meticulously dealing with insurance companies on your behalf and advancing rigorously towards achieving justice and maximum compensation possible under Illinois law for you as our client. Kayaking through red tape isn’t necessary when receiving Carlson Bier’s assistance; we handle every stage of litigation attentively while keeping clear communication channels open consistently with you throughout proceedings. Hence, whenever addressing considerations over dog bite injuries representation reaches utmost priority, remember that it would indeed be prudent to associate yourself with the extensively seasoned expertise embodied by the law firm of Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Tampico Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are an experienced team of personal injury attorneys primed and committed to serving you across the breadth of Illinois. Our firm has earned its stripes handling personal injury cases, one notable area being dog bite injuries – a space in which our expertise shines brightly. Understanding the implications and legal intricacies surrounding dog bites is pivotal to acquiring rightful compensation for afflicted victims. This content will bolster your insight regarding the matter, elucidating on key issues and bringing unprecedented value to our noble readers.

Dog bites can result in both physical harm and psychological trauma, requiring emergency medical treatment coupled with rehabilitation or counseling expenses. An astonishing range of potential damage could be caused by these incidents that may entail:

– Significant medical bills for surgery or specialized treatments,

– Lost wages due to absence from work,

– Permanent disfigurement or disability,

– Psychological distress such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD),

– Pain and suffering above normal living conditions.

Each state in America comes with its set regulations regarding Dog Bite Injuries. In Illinois specifically, owners have strict liability regarding their pets’ actions under “Animal Control Act”. Consequently, they stand liable even if they had no prior knowledge of the pet’s aggressive propensity—a fact worth noting for all residents who might find themselves victimized by biting dogs.

Illinois has two classifications which govern how claims involving dog bite injuries are filed: Negligence Per Se and The One-Bite Rule.

• Negligence Per Se classifies a violation where conduct constitutes negligence when a defendant breaches specific mandated safety measures by law – pertinent regulations specifying appropriate animal control.

• Under The One-Bite Rule provision, prospective claimants must show proof that the dog owner was aware of his/her pet’s inclination towards biting prior availing an incident for him/her to be claimed culpable.

In pursuit of successfully filing suits related to Dog Bite Injuries, emerging victorious during court proceedings requires evidence demonstrating either classified rule has been violated. This is where we at Carlson Bier swing into action, our adept personal injury attorneys having the professional know-how to expertly navigate these regulations and build a substantial case for you.

We cannot stress enough how critical it is to seek immediate medical attention following a dog bite scenario before anything else – your health remains paramount. Following this, we advise contacting local authorities while keeping track of arising medical costs, chiefly because evidence evinces an invaluable role in escalating the chances of acquiring fair compensation.

It’s essential that victims promptly report such incidents or have them documented by police or animal control officers. Furthermore, if possible, collect contact details from witnesses who can corroborate your account of events during court proceedings.

Our team at Carlson Bier are proficient champions inspiring hope and delivering results across Illinois in cases pertaining to Dog Bite Injuries. We offer a rich experience verifiable through client testimonials expressing satisfaction toward swift verdicts and ample compensations granted thereof. Our tenacity extends beyond the confines of regular working hours fortified by passion-driven practices which uphold our clients’ goodwill above all else.

Garnering comprehensive insight on the spectrum covering dog bites will equip you with pertinent knowledge about their impact possibility apart from legal routes necessary for claiming rightful compensations as victims. Trust our expertise here at Carlson Bier to facilitate justice for your peace of mind; tangible testament towards defending innocent victims standing against negligent actions causing havoc in normal living patterns.

Your ahem pursuit for justice need not be overbearing or complicated; our seasoned personal injury attorneys are one click away ready to unveil immeasurable value transcending base expectations deriving from challenges presented alongside Dog Bite Injuries-related claims. By clicking the button below, plunge into unknown depths revealing what your case could potentially amount up to-an empowering expedition engineered exclusively securing restitution reserves you’re rightfully owed.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tampico Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Tampico

Areas of Practice in Tampico

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying skilled legal advice for patients of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending expert legal services for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal help to consumers affected by defective items.

Aged Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their suffering.

Neonatal Damages

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Accidents: Devoted to aiding clients of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for injuries and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Truck Accident

Ensuring specialist legal support for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Engaged in supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and adept legal representation to ensure redress.

Vertebral Trauma

Committed to defending victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​