...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Tampico

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the life-altering aftermath of a spinal cord injury, your path to justice begins with Carlson Bier. Providing the highest level of legal representation in Illinois, we strive to ensure each case is handled diligently and competently. Our steadfast approach to providing proactive assistance sets us apart from other law firms as we work tirelessly for our clients’ rights. Spinal Cord Injuries are an exceptionally complex specialty; however, our team brings years of extensive experience dealing with intricate complications that these injuries entail. Understanding all aspects surrounding them allows us to offer optimal support through every step of the claim process. We employ strategic methodologies yielding positive results located within the practices required by varying jurisdictional demands which have cultivated numerous successful outcomes for our clientele across multiple cities including Tampico. Respectful guidance coupled with aggressive yet ethical negotiation techniques guarantees that you get what you deserve – closure and fair compensation for your ordeal . Choose Carlson Bier – where expertise meets compassionate advocacy in personal injury law relating specifically to spinal cord afflictions.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Tampico Illinois

Spinal cord injuries are among the most severe and life-altering events an individual can experience. At Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities involved in these cases and have dedicated our practice to assisting victims on their road to recovery and compensation.

Knowledge is power, particularly when navigating tricky legal battles related to personal injury law. Let’s delve into a brief overview of spinal cord injuries. These may result from various circumstances – traumatic injury (like car accidents or falls), non-traumatic conditions (such as arthritis), tumors, or even infections and diseases targeting the spine. After enduring such an event, one’s ability to control limbs or organs below the injury site might be compromised, leading to complete paralysis (quadriplegia) or partial motor function loss (paraplegia).

The physical impact of this trauma is often exaggerated by emotional distress and hefty medical bills for specialized treatments like physiotherapy, surgery, rehabilitation programs, medications, assistive devices—the cost can skyrocket quickly. Unfortunately, insurance companies usually strive to minimize claim amounts; thus it becomes crucial that you arm yourself with a proficient personal injury attorney who knows how to defend your rights effectively.

Let us elucidate some key points:

– Prompt action: It is critical to act swiftly after sustaining a spinal cord injury not just for medical help but also necessary legal steps which emphasize statute limitation rules concerning personal injury cases.

– Evidence gathering: Compensation claims rely heavily upon convincing evidence – medical reports detailing your condition progression since the accident can significantly influence your case outcome.

– The right support: Having experienced lawyers reduces your stress—a priority reflected in our firm’s mission at Carlson Bier.

In Illinois—home area of Carlson Bier office—we stand apart due our deep domain expertise about stringent local laws concerning spinal injuries waterfall effect on victim’s lifestyle plus care needs moving forward.

At Carlson Bier we pride ourselves with robust attorney-client relationships ensuring transparency throughout litigation journey which incorporates upfront discussion about possible litigation routes, predicted timescales and financial implications of each move.

What sets us apart is our commitment to your well-being beyond the courtroom. We are skilled at analyzing medical reports, mapping out future care trajectory, negotiating with insurance companies while meticulously performing all court-related paperwork so you can focus on rebuilding your life.

Anyone navigating through spinal injury aftermath knows that it’s not just about legal representation; it’s a battle against time and stress as well. You need a team who fights for maximum compensation in minimum time—like Carlson Bier.

We genuinely believe in our clients’ right to fair compensation which encompasses considerations towards emotional anguish owing to loss of quality life leading from this devastating blow called spinal cord injury.

As an established firm within Illinois region, we’ve watched countless families grappling with spinal cord injuries’ impacts while standing by them assisting in claiming their rightful compensations successfully. Now, we invite you to join these ranks!

Every case varies pertaining its circumstances plus several factors like long-term impact or economic losses suffered determine claim worth but one constant always remains – Carlson Bier’s uncompromising dedication towards securing justice for every client.

Lastly remember, assessing monetary value attached to pain suffered can be overwhelming but fear not! Our online claims calculator awaits below—designed specially enabling quick grasp over probable claim costs following simple clicks–thus offering clear roadmap before plunging into this labyrinthine process called personal injury litigation.

Remember—a journey of thousand miles begins with single step. Let that first step towards rehabilitation plus proper compensation come effortlessly using Carlson Bier’s qualified backing hand guiding you throughout this ordeal securely until final destination—justice rightfully served!

Don’t wait – click on the button below now and find out what your case could be potentially worth exclusively at Carlson Bier where victims metamorphose into victors!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tampico Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Tampico

Areas of Practice in Tampico

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or risky conditions.

Flame Burns

Extending expert legal support for people of major burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing professional legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal guidance to individuals affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Tumble Accidents

Specialist in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking restitution for their injuries.

Birth Damages

Providing legal assistance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Committed to aiding sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable payout for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Truck Crash

Ensuring specialist legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Head Harms

Committed to extending professional legal services for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unfair Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and expert legal support to ensure compensation.

Neural Trauma

Committed to advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer